DS Forums

 
 

The new Ipad. Not selling like hot cakes!!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19-03-2012, 09:12
pocatello
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,622
Why would people not want to be able to view wonderful flash websites like these on a tablet? There are many sites like this, informative, beautiful, creative and functional. See when I am browsing and I come across a site, I want to be able to view it, as it was intended. We keep hearing flash is dead flash is dead, but people are still making sites in flash. Flash is still a web standard and there is a lot of existing content. If I forked out the same amount of money as a pc would cost for an ipad i would EXPECT to be able to play all web content.

What Apple did was so very wrong on many levels, punishing the web authors who have used flash and the customers who have spent good money on their device. I know a lot of you keep making excuses for them and may not even care but those of us who are cerebral and conscious enough, will feel hard done by if we could not get the most out of the web from a 2012 piece of hardware. It's just criminal.

Flash will die, but not right away. It will still be around for the next ipad as it was for the last 3, yet we've been constantly told flash is dead from the Apple faithful. I'm sorry but there is plenty justification for having flash support on a tablet.

http://waterlife.nfb.ca/
http://www.marcecko.com/#/

Both run PERFECTLY on my playbook!
You mourning flash?

Lol, good riddance, apple gave it a good kick and saved us more suffering.
pocatello is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 19-03-2012, 09:16
Stuart_h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
You mourning flash?

Lol, good riddance, apple gave it a good kick and saved us more suffering.
all hail apple! .... it really is like a cult isn't it ......
Stuart_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 10:14
paul2307
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,910
Its amazing how clever marketing can make people believe almost anything, or maybe theres a brainwashing app hidden somwehere in iOS ?
paul2307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 10:54
slick1two
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,796
You mourning flash?

Lol, good riddance, apple gave it a good kick and saved us more suffering.
Suffering? Do explain. I've not suffered whilst using flash since the days of dial up Internet. Been happily using it since it on a mobile platform in the form of my old HTC Hero over 3g running flash with no problems. Works pretty well on my desire hd and perfectly on my playbook.

The only suffering would be from an iOS user when opening up certain web pages only to see the dreaded Get flash notice and then being powerless to get the site to function.

I know you've been there. Don't pretend you haven't.
slick1two is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 11:21
Gormond
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 15,714
Suffering? Do explain. I've not suffered whilst using flash since the days of dial up Internet. Been happily using it since it on a mobile platform in the form of my old HTC Hero over 3g running flash with no problems. Works pretty well on my desire hd and perfectly on my playbook.

The only suffering would be from an iOS user when opening up certain web pages only to see the dreaded Get flash notice and then being powerless to get the site to function.

I know you've been there. Don't pretend you haven't.
Powerless? Give me a break you can easily download another browser from the App Store.

I have hated flash ever since the days of dialup as the sites took a bloody age to load and made my computer crawl... The only annoyance is that it has took so long to die.

Even IE for Metro in Windows 8 doesn't support flash.
Gormond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 12:25
Zack06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
That's just plain wrong, I have been using iOS for 4 years and have yet to have the system crash despite using it heavily every day with hundreds of apps.

The odd app crashes as with every OS but all you do is double click the home button and shut it down.
How do you know that the app has been totally closed? The app management is dire in iOS. In Android you can force close an app, and if you're not convinced that everything has shut down you can check all the running processes and close them down too without having to turn the phone off.....I don't see these features in iOS, and apps do freeze quite often on that OS so they really do need better task management.
Zack06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 13:22
BeethovensPiano
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ♫ At The Keyboard ♫
Posts: 11,556
Well there is currently a financial conference call taking place with Apple and Tim Cook said they had a record breaking weekend.
BeethovensPiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 15:32
Gormond
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 15,714
How do you know that the app has been totally closed? The app management is dire in iOS. In Android you can force close an app, and if you're not convinced that everything has shut down you can check all the running processes and close them down too without having to turn the phone off.....I don't see these features in iOS, and apps do freeze quite often on that OS so they really do need better task management.
Your experience was clearly different than mine, i hardly ever have an app crash, maybe once a month at the very most.

Various apps do show you the open processes even though you can't change them and I have yet to see an app that I have closed or crashed still running, the OS tends to close things like that for you.

A good OS shouldn't require the user to ever go into task manager, it should be all managed for you in the background which is what iOS does.
Gormond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 16:15
Zack06
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 27,438
Your experience was clearly different than mine, i hardly ever have an app crash, maybe once a month at the very most.

Various apps do show you the open processes even though you can't change them and I have yet to see an app that I have closed or crashed still running, the OS tends to close things like that for you.

A good OS shouldn't require the user to ever go into task manager, it should be all managed for you in the background which is what iOS does.
That's like saying a good aircraft doesn't need a cockpit. There needs to be some in depth element of user control or when things go wrong the OS falls down which is what happens with iOS. When an app crashes out completely you don't have many options.

And on a tablet where apps are perhaps even more important, this seems like a glaring omission to me.
Zack06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 17:20
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Well there is currently a financial conference call taking place with Apple and Tim Cook said they had a record breaking weekend.
"We had a record weekend and we're thrilled," was a reply but declined to provide anything more specific.

http://newstech24.com/2012/03/tim-co...of-ipad-sales/

Funny, I thought questions were always banned though maybe that's the very last invite for him.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 17:30
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
That analogy with cockpit isnt very good. A good OS does not crash when app crashes. You may need to kill an app, but that should be an exception not a rule. You do not switch to manual with OS. In ideal world you would not need a task manager. You still need a cockpit in a plane. It's not there just for emergencies.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 20:49
PiazzaCharlie
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,425
Apparently they've sold 3m iPads since Friday. So possibly selling even better than hotcakes.
PiazzaCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 20:53
Gormond
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 15,714
Apparently they've sold 3m iPads since Friday. So possibly selling even better than hotcakes.
Yip, 3 million in 4 days making it the fastest selling iPad yet - http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2012...e-Million.html
Gormond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 21:17
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,031
Why would people not want to be able to view wonderful flash websites like these on a tablet? There are many sites like this, informative, beautiful, creative and functional. See when I am browsing and I come across a site, I want to be able to view it, as it was intended. We keep hearing flash is dead flash is dead, but people are still making sites in flash. Flash is still a web standard and there is a lot of existing content. If I forked out the same amount of money as a pc would cost for an ipad i would EXPECT to be able to play all web content.

What Apple did was so very wrong on many levels, punishing the web authors who have used flash and the customers who have spent good money on their device. I know a lot of you keep making excuses for them and may not even care but those of us who are cerebral and conscious enough, will feel hard done by if we could not get the most out of the web from a 2012 piece of hardware. It's just criminal.

Flash will die, but not right away. It will still be around for the next ipad as it was for the last 3, yet we've been constantly told flash is dead from the Apple faithful. I'm sorry but there is plenty justification for having flash support on a tablet.

http://waterlife.nfb.ca/
http://www.marcecko.com/#/

Both run PERFECTLY on my playbook!
LOL @ marc ecko site on playbook
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 22:23
slick1two
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,796
LOL @ marc ecko site on playbook
It's a slick site
slick1two is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 23:17
linkinpark875
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 24,424
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1344891

Sold 3 million in 4 days. What's that about it not selling well?
linkinpark875 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2012, 23:54
pocatello
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,622
Suffering? Do explain. I've not suffered whilst using flash since the days of dial up Internet. Been happily using it since it on a mobile platform in the form of my old HTC Hero over 3g running flash with no problems. Works pretty well on my desire hd and perfectly on my playbook.

The only suffering would be from an iOS user when opening up certain web pages only to see the dreaded Get flash notice and then being powerless to get the site to function.

I know you've been there. Don't pretend you haven't.
Flash...sorry, but it enhanced almost no websites at all, in the early days before other video standards it was tolerated for that purpose..flash video. Most other usages were just gaudy and not for the benefit of the user, googles website is successful not because its cluttered and filled with elaborate menus and the rest, its simple. Flash encouraged sites to just reinvent the interface for no reasons at all, or fill the page with battery/cpu draining adverts and other nonsense, never mind the countless security holes. It was a mess..and good riddance.

The two sites you linked were terrible, beyond the fact that I had to deal with unblocking scripts for no reason at all..I had to wait for the stupid site to load, for what? An informercial? Give me a break. I don't care if its 5 seconds, if google took 5 seconds to load it would annoy the heck out of you. Those are the incredibly elaborate "sci fi" interfaces that don't work in reality. Flash really is the perfect name, those sites waste your time while you try to figure out whats going on, if you were trying to find something it just wastes your time. Website design has a certain amount of logic behind it, stores like amazon and ebay and google have figured out where peoples eyes go, and making an elaborate animated site is doing it for the sake of doing it, not because it is useful, once you see past the "flash" it becomes obnoxious as it becomes a barrier to finding what you want quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_meat_navigation
"Mystery meat navigation (also known as MMN) is a disparaging term coined in 1998 by author and web designer Vincent Flanders to describe a visually attractive but concurrently inefficient, confusing, or abstruse user interface, usually one that is Internet-based[1]. Such interfaces lack a user-centered design, emphasizing aesthetic appearance, white space, and the concealment of relevant information over basic practicality and functionality."

Worst sites around are invariably "flash" based
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/wors...n-of-2011.html
pocatello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 00:46
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,214
Most people skip generations with apple stuff. Especially the iOS devices, with 24 month phone contracts, and when the iPad 2 came out hardly any upgraded, but said they would wait for the ipad 3. Then most people that bought an ipad 2 didn't already have an ipad 1.
I do that. My iPod touch and Macbook Pro are both from 2010 and I'd only replace them if they were lost, stolen or broken beyond repair.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 07:23
unique
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,031
corrected for you. the clothing is equally hideous

in all the time i've had an iphone/ipad i've never came across a site i really wanted to visit that i couldn't use because of a lack of flash

and if i did want to use a flash site there are numerous ways of viewing them on an iphone/ipad
unique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 08:14
Stuart_h
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
Flash...sorry, but it enhanced almost no websites at all, in the early days before other video standards it was tolerated for that purpose..flash video. Most other usages were just gaudy and not for the benefit of the user, googles website is successful not because its cluttered and filled with elaborate menus and the rest, its simple. Flash encouraged sites to just reinvent the interface for no reasons at all, or fill the page with battery/cpu draining adverts and other nonsense, never mind the countless security holes. It was a mess..and good riddance.

The two sites you linked were terrible, beyond the fact that I had to deal with unblocking scripts for no reason at all..I had to wait for the stupid site to load, for what? An informercial? Give me a break. I don't care if its 5 seconds, if google took 5 seconds to load it would annoy the heck out of you. Those are the incredibly elaborate "sci fi" interfaces that don't work in reality. Flash really is the perfect name, those sites waste your time while you try to figure out whats going on, if you were trying to find something it just wastes your time. Website design has a certain amount of logic behind it, stores like amazon and ebay and google have figured out where peoples eyes go, and making an elaborate animated site is doing it for the sake of doing it, not because it is useful, once you see past the "flash" it becomes obnoxious as it becomes a barrier to finding what you want quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_meat_navigation
"Mystery meat navigation (also known as MMN) is a disparaging term coined in 1998 by author and web designer Vincent Flanders to describe a visually attractive but concurrently inefficient, confusing, or abstruse user interface, usually one that is Internet-based[1]. Such interfaces lack a user-centered design, emphasizing aesthetic appearance, white space, and the concealment of relevant information over basic practicality and functionality."

Worst sites around are invariably "flash" based
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/wors...n-of-2011.html
Hahaha. A worshipper at the altar of jobs ......

A very long rant dissing a tool that helped change the web forever...... think what the web was like before flash if you are old enough. Is it perfect? No. Far from. But its here to stay for a while at least.
Stuart_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 08:23
TheBigM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 12,983
You mourning flash?

Lol, good riddance, apple gave it a good kick and saved us more suffering.
Don't believe the Jobs marketing fluff.

It was done for one very simple reason: if flash was prevalent then app developers could write once, work anywhere. They would write their apps in flash and put them on the web. That would greatly diminish Apple's app store, their last great barrier to entry, it would diminish their ability to control the platform and earn a cut of every developer's income - 30% of all app sales, app ad revenue and in-app purchases is quite a lot.
TheBigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 10:29
slick1two
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,796
Flash...sorry, but it enhanced almost no websites at all, in the early days before other video standards it was tolerated for that purpose..flash video. Most other usages were just gaudy and not for the benefit of the user, googles website is successful not because its cluttered and filled with elaborate menus and the rest, its simple. Flash encouraged sites to just reinvent the interface for no reasons at all, or fill the page with battery/cpu draining adverts and other nonsense, never mind the countless security holes. It was a mess..and good riddance.

The two sites you linked were terrible, beyond the fact that I had to deal with unblocking scripts for no reason at all..I had to wait for the stupid site to load, for what? An informercial? Give me a break. I don't care if its 5 seconds, if google took 5 seconds to load it would annoy the heck out of you. Those are the incredibly elaborate "sci fi" interfaces that don't work in reality. Flash really is the perfect name, those sites waste your time while you try to figure out whats going on, if you were trying to find something it just wastes your time. Website design has a certain amount of logic behind it, stores like amazon and ebay and google have figured out where peoples eyes go, and making an elaborate animated site is doing it for the sake of doing it, not because it is useful, once you see past the "flash" it becomes obnoxious as it becomes a barrier to finding what you want quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_meat_navigation
"Mystery meat navigation (also known as MMN) is a disparaging term coined in 1998 by author and web designer Vincent Flanders to describe a visually attractive but concurrently inefficient, confusing, or abstruse user interface, usually one that is Internet-based[1]. Such interfaces lack a user-centered design, emphasizing aesthetic appearance, white space, and the concealment of relevant information over basic practicality and functionality."

Worst sites around are invariably "flash" based
http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/wors...n-of-2011.html
Absolute nonsense! Firstly,the pages aren't that slow considering they offer a level of interactivity and creativity. Flash sites, at least the good ones are works of art and should be admired. Secondly, you can't speak for the millions of internet users what content they do or do not like. Flash is obviously an avenue that people like to explore. I've seen some amazing flash sites, which are pure flash or a combination of html and flash, which are diverse in their content and as functional as a regular site.

Just because YOU do not like flash based websites doesn't give mean that these sites do not get an audience. Im in to photography and graphic design I have seen some stunning flash sites which are a joy to use. There are good flash sites and their are bad ones, just like any other sites. The good ones work pretty well and i've no complaints. There are even web based flash site creation tools around for people who want to create a site with a little interactivity but do not have technical know how, are able to get their content online.There is still a lot of flash around and there are people who still make good use of it without any problems.

Just because Apple told you flash is crap you all go jump on the band wagon. Try thinking for yourself for a change and don't be so damn arrogant.
slick1two is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 10:45
the chimp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ]]]-- N.F.F.C. --[[[
Posts: 11,635
all hail apple! .... it really is like a cult isn't it ......
It is for some people who seem to be brainwashed, I have an ipad and think its absolutely brilliant, but to say it wouldnt be better with flash is quite frankly a load of tripe, I encounter sites every single day that have flash and its a pain in the ar5e, you still get people who insist they never come across flash sites though....... I call them fanboys.
the chimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 10:50
gemma-the-husky
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,851
i expect a lot of the people who want one, have already got one. the rest of us have more sense
gemma-the-husky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2012, 10:56
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Does that 3 million include those they sold to Currys etc.?
Apple's launch strategy was multi-global this time so it was likely to be a record.

Many will have have held off 3 months or so before purchasing.
The weekend include weeks of pre-orders.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:19.