Originally Posted by Miriam_R:
“I think maybe because she's a gentle person she didn't exert her authority over the team like the others were expecting her to and so maybe some of them mistook her for not doing the job properly. Yes, she didn't prioritse the money aspect but I expect it was as much the lack of sales from her sub team on day 2 that helped not win the task a much as the price of her goods.”
No, the sub-team she was on made £400andsomething by selling everything (and, let's not forget, that includes bumping up the price for personalising items). If the team at the zoo had earned that much (which they couldn't have, as they didn't have the means to personalise anything), then the team as a whole would have made £800andsomething-£900andsomething in total, from which the £400andsomething costs would have been deducted.
The boy's team made £1,000andsomething, from which £300andsomething costs were deducted. Which means that, if the girls had sold everything for the maximum they could, then the boys would have beaten them by a margin of £100andsomething-£200andsomething. And bear in mind with that that the boys didn't sell out of their products, either.
The failure of the task was down to the pricing.