Originally Posted by Zack06:
“They shot themselves in the foot by saying 'no-one wants a big screened phone' and 'who wants to put a tablet in their pocket' etc...yet mere months later, phones like the Evo 4G, Desire HD and Galaxy S II were flying off the shelves...
I don't think their hardware is really competitive any more. Besides it being an iPhone and personal preference for iOS there are other devices which blow this out of orbit. They really need to upgrade to at least a 4" screen at a minimum to remain competitive in the future. Just look at the massive disappointment of the 4S launch. Everyone was expecting a screen bump.
I don't think it's mono-perspective to say that they need to increase their screen size. Besides is there really that much difference between 3.5" and ~4" that it would be detrimental for their consumer base? I think it's just a case of Apple being stubborn and thinking that they can dictate the market but it has not worked.”
It's not that anyone is insisting 3.5" is the best screen size. It's that going any larger would likely increase the size of the phone itself. That's what many folk are against. They don't want their next phone to be more unwieldy than their last.
For illustration, without dipping into wide aspect ratio or being able to reduce the bezel thickness, going to 4" would increase the width of the phone by 0.26" - an 11% increase.
Going 4.3" would add 0.43" - a 22% increase.
Going 4.6" would add 0.59" - a 30% increase.
So where do you draw the line? Wherever you draw it, someone is going to think it sucks.