Netflix abandons "Terra Nova" |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,841
|
Ratings have fallen off a cliff especially in the 18-49 demo
Episode 1&2 3.3 Episode3 3 Episode4 2.8 Episode5 2.3 Episode6 1.9 Episode7 1.8 Episode8 1.9 Episode9 1.8 Episode10 1.6 Episode11 1.6 Episode12 1.5 Episode13 1.5 And most importantly it's only cheap for Fox as it was thrown in to get Fringe renewed as they needed 1 more season to get it in syndication. It's reached that level now and Alcatraz will have to stand on its own two feet which I don't think it can do. Its ratings are such that it could only ever go on a Friday which would see ratings drop off atleast another couple of points so Fox would want a reduction in the fee and there is no way International sales are strong enough to support that, I doubt it's making the production side money even now as WB/Bad robot are already said to be taking most of the costs anyway |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,431
|
TV companies really need to get their head around the new marketplace which technology has created.
In the days of PVR's and internet downloads, viewers are no longer tied to sitting down at the channel time to watch shows. My viewing habits have totally changed over the last few years. Now I rarely sit down to watch programes, but I'll save a few up at at time, or watch them over the weekend etc. I saved up Terra Nova to watch, but started to hear how the audience ratings were going and so never watched what I knew would become another canceled after 1 series show. I bet I'm not alone, and I bet that audiences getting used to canceled shows make that siuation worse by not investing in them at the start. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,032
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,032
|
Quote:
Additionally, during the Terra Nova’s pre-premiere buzz, I remember reading articles about the FOX execs and the Terra Nova producers attempting to allay fears about its cost. It was obvious from what they were saying that they were feeling the pressure of making it a success. The reporters kept probing them about the cost and their only reply was, “If the show becomes as I’m sure it will, the cost will mean nothing.” Not really a good way to say that the show isn’t as costly as most people think. Yes, I agree about Alcatraz in that its international sales are not that great and its fanbase is not rabid or big, but nor is Terra Nova’s fanbase. They’re both freshman dramas that failed in their first seasons (and were both critically panned by critics), so I’d say they have around the same size of fanbase (Terra Nova’s is probably bigger though due its more popular concept of dinosaurs and the Steven Spielberg factor). Alcatraz, as you said, has worse ratings than Terra Nova. So it’s hard to say which one has more of a chance of being picked up by Netflix, but for me, it’s Alcatraz mostly due its lower cost than Terra Nova and better reviews. I'm sure Netflix would see it as a challenge and a bargain to improve Alcatraz's fanbase and international sales with its low cost. Regarding your point about Alcatraz only being offered to FOX to ensure Fringe stayed on air and reached syndication levels, I’m not sure I buy that. I heard reports about this when Alcatraz was in pre-production, but I didn’t regard them as anything more than Internet chatter. Personally, I doubt Bad Robot would do that, just so one of their other shows could stay on air. It does not ring true to me. Shows are never offered to keep another show on air. Fringe stayed on air due to WB reducing the licence fee for the show and the fact that Fringe performed decently in its new scheduling slot on Fridays (Obviously, that has changed this season with the ratings falling to new lows). Not to mention, Fringe's reduced budget. I guess that was enough for FOX to allow another season of Fringe. Yes, I totally agree about your last point about Fringe being more likely to be picked up by Netflix. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,032
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TheEssexSunshineCoast Clacton
Services: SkyHD1TB 19MB,LGPK350,EE SGS2, PS3 DAB FM Radio Tecsun 600 Dell Vostro 3700
Posts: 11,146
|
Would this be to much for Syfy channel to buy?
It would be cool if it were on here. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,043
|
Quote:
So really don't get your hopes up the show is very unlikely to get picked up by anyone. Very annoying in my opinion. for yet another show with great potential, to be ruined by rubbish story telling. Now any news on what show we can expect in September anyone any new pilots ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mayo,IRE
Posts: 3,104
|
I could see The River getting picked up by Netflix......
It wouldn't be the most expensive show to produce, except for location... It would do quiet well on Netflix. They should pick up season 1 and show it over the summer to measure how well it would do |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mayo,IRE
Posts: 3,104
|
Quote:
Here's a list: http://tvline.com/2012/02/01/pilot-s...bs-cw-fox-nbc/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,032
|
Quote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:50.





.