Originally Posted by stash22:
“The last one was a couple of months ago and very much appeared that he had sold 'a story' rather than a couple of quotes over the phone. I accept that they twist comments but in that case he should maybe stop talking to them, as he had to straighten out the comments in the last article too. He said he stands by what was in the article...other than the fact he dislikes simon so it sounds like most of those comments do reflect what he thinks.”
The press very rarely pay anything for a story and when they do it is a big exclusive not a single story in a scottish newspaper. Perhaps you have his invoice for the payment?
I just love DS because of its assumption of guilt before innocence. It can be a bit of a kangaroo court at times. Newspapers have stories prewritten before they interview people so my guess is that when they got the news that Jai had been dropped they called him to get 'his side of the story'. Remember that Simon has far more PR behind him than any of his artists past present or future.
Any artist should be grateful for the support they receive it doesn't endear them to anyone to b1tch about it after. But to a newspaper, this is too neat and tidy and means it isn't really news, so they need to 'sex it up a bit'. Don't believe all you read, it always has an editorial slant geared towards those that help them generate ad revenue. It's not your 30p that pays for your copy of The Sun (or whatever other newspaper you care to buy) but all the ad money. "He who pays the piper calls the tune" as the saying goes. Murdoch didn't pull the NOTW because he was disgusted with what happened, it was the advertisers withdrew their money.