Originally Posted by
ferfer:
“It's so interesting isn't it that Josie is villified for things she says which people take wrong because they're looking for a reason to be mad at her, but John has said and done many things specifically and purposely that are awful, but it's dismissed since he "probably" regrets it. LOL, I don't think he regrets his BB follow, RT, or #FF as they are all still there. He doesn't regret sticking up for Mark who tweeted that JJJ were fake. He's never shown any form of regret. But anything John actually does gets excused away, while Josie's tweets are blown up so that she's against her supporters because they are looking for a reason to prove she's a horrible person, when she has stayed exactly true to who she was, while John has shown the opposite. (BTW, I think anyone who was offended by the weirdo comment felt that way because they know they've talked crap on her or Luke and there was a bit of guilt there)
I've heard that Josie has occaisionally posted in Muckers. I'm not a member so I don't know for sure. The difference is that Josie tweets to everyone and anyone. She doesn't favor any fans over others. John knows Loys is private. He knows it's a select group of people and he chooses to only post there. That's his perrogative of course, but he's not dumb. He knows what is going on.
And I think it's hysterical that people are so worried that the reason John doesn't tweet is because of idiot eggs tweeting him about Jonno. LOL, he hasn't tweeted for almost a year except to go off on or about Josie and the random tweet every few months. Furthermore, John started the hate by baiting people early on when out of the house. He asked for it, he LOVED it, those were the only people he responded to. You can't egg that on and then cry foul that that's why Twitter is so awful. He encouraged the hate and has done so recently as well. Another case of can give it, but can't take it?
Josie's a lot more clicked on than people think she is. She knows who everyone is. She knows whether they like her or not. She knows who trashes Luke or who doesn't support her (even though they pretend to), yet she still is nice to everyone. Yet, she's the one who ALWAYS gets stick while Jonn's horrible actions are dismissed and excused again and again.
And let's be honest. John is thanking the loys for their support. There's no sarcasm (please), he's thanking them for what they do more than they will EVER know. John is being exclusive here. And thanking people is cool, but that place has bashed Josie repeatedly. But John likes to encourage that too, so he's just staying true to who he really is.
Sorry for that rant. Carry on.
”
As I have said before,I don't see it anymore as I don't look on twitter or ds for it.Double standards has often played a part with those 2 even before the split.One rule for one one rule for another.I have asked myself ,as ppl that like and support Josie have been accused of ignoring her failings and bad points,of blindly following her,of being exactly like her so know no better.My answer is that I can see her faults,I can see her failings,I am not really like her except maybe a sense of humour.
When BB was on ppl dissected,studied and debated their actions,good or bad.Bar a few baiters all opinions were welcomed as we could see for ourselves what was happening ( mostly as even though there was 24hr livefeed we didn't see it all as cameras would go to other rooms,blank out convos and of course we only saw some diary room enteries and these were edited ) so opinions changed daily,hrly.even every minute as it all unfolded.
When they came out we saw tweets, twitcams ,mag interviews.tv interviews,docu's etc and still we discussed but it was less real and more staged.Even PA's were just a snippet and not a real human situation
Now all we can do is discuss again what we see & read and if we meet Josie what we feel.The rest is supposition. I have looked at both their actions and decided where I wanted to be.There was no ultimatium for me to do this but I had always been a Josie supporter first.I chose not to support both seperately but can't see the problem if ppl do that or just support John.
The belief that John is * poor John * has been about since BB.Whereas Josie losing her father at 10 and the disparate childhood she had have been used as reasons why she is a BAD & Violent person.They say she is not empathetic yet show no empathy for her.I would say that the fact Josie chose not to mention her fathers death on BB unlike John & Sunshine shows that she didn't want to go down the * poor me * route( I am not saying they did it for that purpose either , but she has been accused of manipulating ppl whilst on BB ),She did it when she left as it had come out along with the stories of her gran
She is now entering a new phase of her life , with a guy who is also doing the same.They are both building a new home together and working hard for their own careers.Stability has come to Josie and she is living her life now with her fiance,friends and family all together this time & beside her. This means that they aren't glued together,tweeting out pics 24/7,not following a path or behaviour set out by others but by themselves. If you like someone it doesn't mean you have a right to tell them how to live or behave,and to diss Luke when you don't even know the guy is childish.I don't,didn't and won't diss Sherrie whether she is or isn't with John.As for him I don't wish him ill,what he does is his own business & again no one has the right to tell him what to do or how to live either. I do however agree with you about his behaviour Ferfs but believe he is her past and should stay there,not be discussed in here
And Breatheeeeeeee
Wow that just flowed,will never do that again and can't be assed to discuss it on here either