Exceptional performance by both The Voice and Britain's Got Talent last night. Everyone involved should be over the moon even if Talent is on course for another (somewhat) unfair kicking from the press this week.
I honestly don't know why people think the Battle Rounds are the weakest part of the format. They make for some brilliant television as they usually contain some amazing performances and some genuine tension and surprises as the coaches decide who to keep and who to get rid of.
And again we come back to the position of whether or not the BBC should be getting into bidding wars not only with Sky but ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and now ESPN over sports contracts. With basically every major broadcaster (and ESPN) on the hunt for sports contracts it simply isn't realistic to expect the BBC to maintain the level of sports coverage they had 3 years ago unless you're advocating them throwing huge sums of money after these contracts – in which case we get the over side of the coin where people bemoan how much the BBC is spending on content that could have gone to ITV or Channel's 4 and 5. Beyond that there's also the issue that the BBC (just like everyone else) aren't really in a position to be able to outbid Sky when they decide they want a sports contract although I would agree that they should try and keep some kind of stake in that content and stop it going behind a pay wall completely.
How much money are you advocating they spend to rectify that?
Sky are reportedly paying £195 million for exclusive rights to league football should the BBC have tried to compete with that bid? Or should they have paid the £70 million that's short of the last Sky/BBC joint deal for league football rights? That assumes Sky would have let them do that and weren't looking for exclusive rights. Or maybe they should spend £100+ million on the Premier League rights that ESPN currently have? Or at least on one of the Premier League packages that are available? Or they could have spent £90+ million to get ITV's FA Cup/England games rights? Or more still on picking up ESPN's FA Cup package?
Its all well and good to say that its a shame the BBC don't have live football outside of the two major international championships (and I agree it is) but the reason for that is its bloody expensive. Had the BBC gone after the FA Cup/England games rights that ITV currently have then that I suspect would have easily driven the price of that over £100 million for a two-year contract. If the BBC were to make a play for live Premier League games then I dread to think what kind of offers Sky and ESPN would put in to stop them with my £100+ million above being very much on the low side.
You make it sound as if the BBC were the home of horse racing until this year. More importantly than this though they let the rights go to a FTA commercial broadcast rather than getting involved a potentially costly bidding war for them. I don't think that's a terrible thing. It might not be great for BBC Sport but the viewer isn't actually losing out here and that should really be more important than the BBC Sport department at this stage. I think its time people accepted that it simply is not viable for the BBC to hold any and every sports contract you want them to have.
And now the BBC should be all about ratings - where are all those 'that's not the purpose of the BBC' posters when you want them?
From my perspective there's a space for ratings chasing (and BBC Sport still have contracts that are very much capable of big numbers) but that isn't all the BBC is nor is it all BBC Sport should be. The contracts capable of pulling big numbers are never going to be short of commercial broadcasters wanting to air them so perhaps there's an argument to be made that the BBC shouldn't be as focused on those contracts but on smaller sports that others aren't so interested in and if it weren't for the BBC would probably only ever find a home behind a pay wall...?
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“I have a feeling the blind auditions are the best thing about The Voice. From the previews next week it didn't look great. But I do think the lack of a clash should negate any dip that might have signified and it should be fine. The Sunday show especially will rate very well I think.”
“I have a feeling the blind auditions are the best thing about The Voice. From the previews next week it didn't look great. But I do think the lack of a clash should negate any dip that might have signified and it should be fine. The Sunday show especially will rate very well I think.”
I honestly don't know why people think the Battle Rounds are the weakest part of the format. They make for some brilliant television as they usually contain some amazing performances and some genuine tension and surprises as the coaches decide who to keep and who to get rid of.
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“There are 104 weekend days per year. In the year Sept 2012 to Aug 2013, on how many of those 104 days will the BBC have any live sport on BBC1 or BBC2? The number will have fallen massively compared to 2 or 3 years ago.”
“There are 104 weekend days per year. In the year Sept 2012 to Aug 2013, on how many of those 104 days will the BBC have any live sport on BBC1 or BBC2? The number will have fallen massively compared to 2 or 3 years ago.”
And again we come back to the position of whether or not the BBC should be getting into bidding wars not only with Sky but ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5 and now ESPN over sports contracts. With basically every major broadcaster (and ESPN) on the hunt for sports contracts it simply isn't realistic to expect the BBC to maintain the level of sports coverage they had 3 years ago unless you're advocating them throwing huge sums of money after these contracts – in which case we get the over side of the coin where people bemoan how much the BBC is spending on content that could have gone to ITV or Channel's 4 and 5. Beyond that there's also the issue that the BBC (just like everyone else) aren't really in a position to be able to outbid Sky when they decide they want a sports contract although I would agree that they should try and keep some kind of stake in that content and stop it going behind a pay wall completely.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“The BBC have lost Carling Cup rights for the 2012/2013 season. This means once the European Chmapionships are out of the way the BBC will be showing NO live football.”
“The BBC have lost Carling Cup rights for the 2012/2013 season. This means once the European Chmapionships are out of the way the BBC will be showing NO live football.”
How much money are you advocating they spend to rectify that?
Sky are reportedly paying £195 million for exclusive rights to league football should the BBC have tried to compete with that bid? Or should they have paid the £70 million that's short of the last Sky/BBC joint deal for league football rights? That assumes Sky would have let them do that and weren't looking for exclusive rights. Or maybe they should spend £100+ million on the Premier League rights that ESPN currently have? Or at least on one of the Premier League packages that are available? Or they could have spent £90+ million to get ITV's FA Cup/England games rights? Or more still on picking up ESPN's FA Cup package?
Its all well and good to say that its a shame the BBC don't have live football outside of the two major international championships (and I agree it is) but the reason for that is its bloody expensive. Had the BBC gone after the FA Cup/England games rights that ITV currently have then that I suspect would have easily driven the price of that over £100 million for a two-year contract. If the BBC were to make a play for live Premier League games then I dread to think what kind of offers Sky and ESPN would put in to stop them with my £100+ million above being very much on the low side.
Quote:
“The BBC haven't just lost The Grand National they have lost ALL racing to Channel 4, so there will be NO racing on the BBC for the next 4 years.”
“The BBC haven't just lost The Grand National they have lost ALL racing to Channel 4, so there will be NO racing on the BBC for the next 4 years.”
You make it sound as if the BBC were the home of horse racing until this year. More importantly than this though they let the rights go to a FTA commercial broadcast rather than getting involved a potentially costly bidding war for them. I don't think that's a terrible thing. It might not be great for BBC Sport but the viewer isn't actually losing out here and that should really be more important than the BBC Sport department at this stage. I think its time people accepted that it simply is not viable for the BBC to hold any and every sports contract you want them to have.
Quote:
“How much of the BBC's remaining sports portfolio bar Wimbledon, F1 and Six Nations will get big audiences? Not much.”
“How much of the BBC's remaining sports portfolio bar Wimbledon, F1 and Six Nations will get big audiences? Not much.”
And now the BBC should be all about ratings - where are all those 'that's not the purpose of the BBC' posters when you want them?
From my perspective there's a space for ratings chasing (and BBC Sport still have contracts that are very much capable of big numbers) but that isn't all the BBC is nor is it all BBC Sport should be. The contracts capable of pulling big numbers are never going to be short of commercial broadcasters wanting to air them so perhaps there's an argument to be made that the BBC shouldn't be as focused on those contracts but on smaller sports that others aren't so interested in and if it weren't for the BBC would probably only ever find a home behind a pay wall...?




- whens it going to stop?”
. Viewers are loving it, they are recommending it to other people, the strongest way of advertising is good old word of mouth. And The Voice has plenty of that! People have sampled all the shows around and seem to have come to the conclusion that The Voice offers them the most entertainment on a Saturday night and its now turned into Britains favourite talent show. Imagine all the great PR its gonna get this week, probably guarantee another few hundred thousand watching next Saturday!
