I think they are as bad as 2003's Eurovision act Gemini or something they were called?, they are certainly not stars.

2 to go have more talent than any of the rest...they are definitely better than voices with soul...i guess it depends on what kind of music you like...if you like plastic pop eg..busted...mcfly...linkin park then true talent doesnt mean that much to you...but if you appreciate artists such as the beatles and queen then 2 to go are definitely your cup of tea...

2 to go were poor, utter flat singers and deserved to go.

I love The Beatles, but 2 To Go were still crap in my opinion.

They weren't great but I don't think they were THAT bad.

Sorry... what on earth do 2 To Go have in common with Queen and The Beatles?!

That really does have to go into my top ten funniest posts you've made Mr Blonde

Hmmm, not as bad as H & Claire, sorry I mean Jemini, but they were cabaret of the highest order!

The only thing 2 To Go have in common with The Beatles and Queen is that their name is also made up of consonants and vowels.

S.

What on earth does Tabby have to do with rock music in general?

The beautiful and talented Jemini were the innocent victims of an anti-British conspiracy!

As I've said on a couple of other threads, even though I don't rate 2 to Go as an act, I do think Peter is excellent and has a really good voice and loads of talentand musical ability. I think on his own he could do very well but that Emma lets him down badly - there's just something about them as an act that doesn't work.

A conspiracy that made them sing flat?

Kindly shut your idiot face