• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • Pets
Pet ban for Somerset couple
CELT1987
19-04-2012
A couple have been banned from keeping pets for 8 years http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-17767918

How can you keep 56 dogs in one house?
KnifeEdge
19-04-2012
Glad that they have been banned from keeping animals.

A friend of mine has adopted one of the dogs, and the dog is doing very well.

This couple appeared to have good intentions, but got themselves totally overwhelmed. The animals weren't ill treated as such, but there were far too many of them for these people to take care of, and they were far too cramped.
Blackjack Davy
20-04-2012
Classic hoarding symptoms. Some people like to rescue animals from abuse, which is fine, but they can't bear to part with them. So one animal becomes two, two becomes three, three becomes four..... etc. They can't see that there comes a point where they not really helping the animals at all.
shirlt9
20-04-2012
I am wondering how they were allowed to keep their 5 children after allowing them to live in these conditions..
Saturn
20-04-2012
Their children should be taken into care. It's astonishing that none of those children were attacked by any of these dogs.
pugamo
20-04-2012
To be fair, the animals all look to be in good condition except for a couple that do look thin. I don't think that they intended to be cruel at all.
Abriel
20-04-2012
Originally Posted by pugamo:
“To be fair, the animals all look to be in good condition except for a couple that do look thin. I don't think that they intended to be cruel at all.”

I thought they looked ok on the picture I saw, incredible, really

Apparently the baby was in a cot covered in bird droppings. amazing neighbours didn't complain earlier
susie-4964
20-04-2012
Originally Posted by pugamo:
“To be fair, the animals all look to be in good condition except for a couple that do look thin. I don't think that they intended to be cruel at all.”

They probably didn't intend to be cruel, but on the basis that sane people wouldn't look after 56 dogs in one house, I wouldn't regard this couple as fit to look after five children.
pugamo
21-04-2012
Originally Posted by Abriel:
“I thought they looked ok on the picture I saw, incredible, really

Apparently the baby was in a cot covered in bird droppings. amazing neighbours didn't complain earlier”

I suppose it depends on how much of that was exaggerated by the press. If the cot was covered with bird droppings, it is rather disgusting. If there was a stray bird poo at the bottom of the bed, which was to be changed that day, that is something else entirely. I'm considering this on the basis that we just don't know the truth and i'm taking that one with a pinch of salt. How they found the time to look after all those dogs and five children is beyond me! I can barely look after two dogs and I have no children!
cats_five
21-04-2012
Can't see any reason to take the children away if they are reasonably well looked after. There is no hint of child abuse, and for all we know they now have Social Services breathing down their necks. Children taken into care do far worse than children with even quite bad parents.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map