• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Would Stephen had been fired if his team lost?
Gothic-Dude
20-04-2012
Seeing how this season is going probably not.
CaroUK
20-04-2012
Depends who he brought back with him......

If he had brought back someone who has been flying under the radar or who was obnoxious....they could well have gone before him....If he brought back stronger ones who have worked hard he could well have gine.

I wonder which chain of Health Clubs he works for though???
QuirkyGirl
20-04-2012
I don't think he would have. Apart from the random prices for the equipment I thought he was a good PM this week and seemed to be really enjoying it too. I loved the cheesy video.
meglosmurmurs
20-04-2012
I think he would have stayed, apart from the one bad idea about the free kit, his enthusiasm for the task was rather good.

Sugar wanted the ones who didn't contribute much, and I'm not too sure what Katie or Tom did on this team.
Although Adam always seems to escape by the skin of his teeth, I have a feeling that Sugar is wanting to get him back in the boardroom at some point to give him a dressing-down.

Isn't it strange though that no losing PM has been fired so far. Must be a record.
blowup
20-04-2012
Originally Posted by meglosmurmurs:
“I think he would have stayed, apart from the one bad idea about the free kit, his enthusiasm for the task was rather good.

Sugar wanted the ones who didn't contribute much, and I'm not too sure what Katie or Tom did on this team.
Although Adam always seems to escape by the skin of his teeth, I have a feeling that Sugar is wanting to get him back in the boardroom at some point to give him a dressing-down.

Isn't it strange though that no losing PM has been fired so far. Must be a record.”

i actually felt a bit sorry for adam when he went on that bungling rant about choreography - i wasn't entirely sure what they question was either.

he is a complete irritant and sexist, but i think some of it is well-meaning and he was right with what he said about jade and tom shirking off the choreography. it wasn't fair to say he had to do it since he knew it - they should have known it too!
Sherlock_Holmes
20-04-2012
Originally Posted by meglosmurmurs:
“Sugar wanted the ones who didn't contribute much, and I'm not too sure what Katie or Tom did on this team.”

Katie came up with the concept and Tom rightfully made the comment about the costs for the equipment.

Think you were tricked by the editing, as they didn't show Katie, Tom and Stephen on the second day (when the teams were shooting the vids and writing the speeches).


Originally Posted by meglosmurmurs:
“Isn't it strange though that no losing PM has been fired so far. Must be a record.”

Having seen who will be the PM's next week, that streak will definitely be broken.
capekdeh
20-04-2012
Definitely not. There are worse candidates in Stephen's team (i.e. Adam who was so poor in directing the video).
JonGTFCFan
20-04-2012
It would have been Stephen or Adam.

Lord Sugar often fires candidates when they fail in their chosen 'field of expertise' so Stephen was in trouble there, but Adam is undoubtedly the recipient of this year's 'idiot'-edit.
Marmite Baby
23-04-2012
Definitely Stephen and if Adam had been brought back, it would have been a double firing.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map