Originally Posted by DavetheScot:
“There's no way they'd have edited the series the way they have if Adam was the eventual winner. They'd have at least tried to make him look less of an idiot.”
Completely agree. He's no more than comedy filler who will survive longer than he should but still not reach the final. He's this year's Michael Sophocles, Tre Azam or Stuart Baggs.
Particularly in more recent years, the winner always gets a 99% sympathetic edit, generally with lots of little clips inserted in early eps just to show them being competent even if they don't do much. That was the case with Tom Pellereau last year - he did very little in tasks, but was positioned as insightful and good with ideas (i.e. a mad inventor). This year I'm thinking Tom, Gabrielle and Nick. Even though Gab has shown weaknesses in terms of commercial nous, that can be easily addressed if her business idea is good - and it has been firmly established so far that she is an 'ideas' person.
As I've said elsewhere, it also helps that she is an architect/designer and Sugar's biggest business these days is property - there's a good fit there which would make her an interesting investment prospect for him.
I've covered all this and more in more detail on my blog round-up this week ...
http://slouchingtowardsthatcham.com/...6-street-food/