|
||||||||
steve. lying backstabber, moron, looks=bug eyed fish. agree or disagree? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 38
|
steve. lying backstabber, moron, looks=bug eyed fish. agree or disagree?
he really has no redeeming qualities. there are smart people who are nasty. or dim people who are nice.
but he is awful in every way. he is incredibly stupid (everything he does always fails). really, really nasty (last boardroom he was the nastiest piece of work i can remember on the show). the biggest liar i have ever seen on the apprentice (again last boardroom i have never seen someone lie so much and so boldly). he is a sly 2 faced rat "good to see you buddy, i was afraid you would nt come back. lets move on shall we?" (let us just forget all the nasty, lying, backstabbing i did an hour ago). and to top it all he looks like a bug eyed fish. steve as a young boy http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...3008-2717.html don't know if i have overstepped the forum rules with this post. but i have tried to back up my opinions with facts, including the bug eyed fish comment. one redeeming feature he has though, is when the time inevitably arrives when you want to give him a black eye, he gives a really nice big target to hit.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 698
|
To begin with I liked him but he showed his true colours at the last boardroom, lying to save his own skin. He was plain nasty. I hope nick has marked his card with suralan.
And yes I don't think he expected to see Adam back. (Well nor did I, but anyway...) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,219
|
But he's certainly playing the game well and could never be called dull
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
To begin with I liked him but he showed his true colours at the last boardroom, lying to save his own skin. He was plain nasty. I hope nick has marked his card with suralan.
And yes I don't think he expected to see Adam back. (Well nor did I, but anyway...) I just thought Stephen was just a bit of an idiot before last week, but the way he shoved Azhar in the firing line, for me, showed just how much of a weak candidate Adam is and how easily he can be manipulated. Personally, I think bringing Jade in would have been an obvious personal choice and, in many ways, I think Stephen possibly saved him last week in that he didn't bring Jade in. Stephen I think will last longer than Adam, but will lose out before the Final Five stage. We shall see though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 698
|
Wouldn't it be great to see Stephen squirm & try to be manipulative at interview, tho? Claude et al would have the measure of him very quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,441
|
Quote:
he really has no redeeming qualities. there are smart people who are nasty. or dim people who are nice.
but he is awful in every way. he is incredibly stupid (everything he does always fails). really, really nasty (last boardroom he was the nastiest piece of work i can remember on the show). the biggest liar i have ever seen on the apprentice (again last boardroom i have never seen someone lie so much and so boldly). he is a sly 2 faced rat "good to see you buddy, i was afraid you would nt come back. lets move on shall we?" (let us just forget all the nasty, lying, backstabbing i did an hour ago). and to top it all he looks like a bug eyed fish. steve as a young boy http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...3008-2717.html don't know if i have overstepped the forum rules with this post. but i have tried to back up my opinions with facts, including the bug eyed fish comment. one redeeming feature he has though, is when the time inevitably arrives when you want to give him a black eye, he gives a really nice big target to hit. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 38
|
completely agree
Wouldn't it be great to see Stephen squirm & try to be manipulative at interview, tho? Claude et al would have the measure of him very quickly.
that would make for very entertaining viewing. claude would serve him up, bug eyed fish deep fried and battered from all sides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
Quote:
To begin with I liked him but he showed his true colours at the last boardroom, lying to save his own skin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,806
|
Wowsers, harsh first post. I think it's normal for The Apprentice to have one manipulative person that scares the others a bit.
I won't lie, I liked him until the last episode. He came across as a bit of a doughnut who tried a bit too hard. Now he just comes across horrid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,739
|
I'm not keen on him but for self deluded nasty boardroom behaviour Philip "Pantsman" was far, far worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 28,296
|
What I'd like to see is him, Ricky and Adam all fired at the same time! They keep on teaming up with each other or with someone else when they know they are in trouble, and I sure do hope Sugar realises this or someone points it out and they all get the chop in one go! Be brilliant to see, no more than they deserve imo and it would be an Apprentice first to see 3 of them sacked before the final!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 211
|
He is a nasty piece of work but he is not on his own. Jade is not much better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,220
|
I think the guy isnt as horrendous as is being said. He has a cocky demeanor, but I don't think its fair to call him two faced or a backstabber when virtually every candidate has behaved in the same manner in the BR. You say what you can to avoid a firing, thats normal apprentice fare.
I dont think he did lie last week either. Azhar did next to nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
Wowsers, harsh first post. I think it's normal for The Apprentice to have one manipulative person that scares the others a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,016
|
Not really a surprise is it to see an apprentice contestant behave like this, is it? They're business people not humanitarians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 14,737
|
Stephen is definitely someone who would stab you in the back. I wouldn't want to work with him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,298
|
Quote:
he really has no redeeming qualities. there are smart people who are nasty. or dim people who are nice.
but he is awful in every way. he is incredibly stupid (everything he does always fails). really, really nasty (last boardroom he was the nastiest piece of work i can remember on the show). the biggest liar i have ever seen on the apprentice (again last boardroom i have never seen someone lie so much and so boldly). he is a sly 2 faced rat "good to see you buddy, i was afraid you would nt come back. lets move on shall we?" (let us just forget all the nasty, lying, backstabbing i did an hour ago). and to top it all he looks like a bug eyed fish. steve as a young boy http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...3008-2717.html don't know if i have overstepped the forum rules with this post. but i have tried to back up my opinions with facts, including the bug eyed fish comment. one redeeming feature he has though, is when the time inevitably arrives when you want to give him a black eye, he gives a really nice big target to hit. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 24
|
Yeah not a fan of him either.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21.


