• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 35)
<<
<
103 of 159
>>
>
Glenn A
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Samthefootball:
“Chelsea are not in the Europa league, Tottenham, Liverpool and Newcastle are. Because Chelsea won last weekend they remain in the Champions League ”

Sorry my football knowledge isn't that good, I thought only the top three clubs went into the CL. However, Liverpool could be a big ratings draw if they do well in the EL.
But a little more on topic, I think ITV1 have fixed Tuesdays now with football and repeats of well liked dramas. I think this makes more sense than cheap factual and poor rating reality like The Biggest Loser.
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by garyessex:
“Hmm Jessie J predicting 6 million people are watching TV”

Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“If she means television, she could be right ”

I won't tell you lot again. STOP USING TV AS AN ABBREVIATION FOR THE VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!! TV stands for television!!!!!!!

Spoiler
garyessex
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“I won't tell you lot again. STOP USING TV AS AN ABBREVIATION FOR THE VOICE!!!!!!!!!!!!! TV stands for television!!!!!!!

Spoiler
”

Or transvestite. *Looks at Danny*
GeorgeS
26-05-2012
Transvision Vamp!
Charnham
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“I might have to agree. Holly builds up to his comments and he starts off with a pause. Completely kills the flow.

They need a new sheet of paper for the live shows.”

to be honest I would fire him just for spelling his name like that.

Would certainly introduce Lauren Laverne as host, she is rare mix of being hot, and someone whos respected musically.

Also yes the TV abbreviation is a bit annoying.
Chris1964
26-05-2012
Another part of The Voice that will have to be altered-Holly asking each coach to pick between their acts-not surprising they all said dont know.

Now Cheryl is on with what looks like a gym class routine-just missed the start of the football.
D.M.N.
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Last week's breakdown of The Voice:
Code:
18:30	3.93
18:35	4.47
18:40	4.79
18:45	5.01
18:50	5.09
18:55	5.49
19:00	5.90
19:05	5.95
19:10	6.09
19:15	6.27
19:20	6.44
19:25	6.45
19:30	6.30
19:35	6.34
19:40	6.11
19:45	5.89
19:50	5.96
19:55	4.78
”

So did The Voice only go above 6 million because it was against football build-up?

Interesting breakdown, and I wouldn't be surprised to see another drop tonight. Here's how England have done in the build-up to other tournaments:

24/05/10 - 7.61m (33.6%)
* match average: 8.64m (37.1%)
30/05/10 - 3.30m (27.4%)
* match average: 3.4m (26.9%)

A high rating is not automatically guaranteed, I wouldn't be surprised to see the match rate in the high ~5m's/low 6m's myself.
GeorgeS
26-05-2012
Everything bar a course of leeches has been suggested as a way to cure The Voice of what ails it. Many of the suggestions are contradictory - be more like The X factor, be less like The X Factor. Reminds me of the debate on Daybreak
SamuelW
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Interesting breakdown, and I wouldn't be surprised to see another drop tonight. Here's how England have done in the build-up to other tournaments:

24/05/10 - 7.61m (33.6%)
* match average: 8.64m (37.1%)
30/05/10 - 3.30m (27.4%)
* match average: 3.4m (26.9%)

A high rating is not automatically guaranteed, I wouldn't be surprised to see the match rate in the high ~5m's/low 6m's myself.”

Theres been less buzz about this England team than any other before a major championship in my lifetime. No chance itll get 7.61million and it will be beaten by Eurovision. Eurovisions been terrible as usual so far, a rubbish entry from the UK with no chance of winning and Graham Norton trying so hard to be as funny as Terry Wogan but not as good as the great man himself.
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Everything bar a course of leeches has been suggested as a way to cure The Voice of what ails it. Many of the suggestions are contradictory - be more like The X factor, be less like The X Factor. Reminds me of the debate on Daybreak ”

That's only a problem** if the suggestions all came from the same person.





**for the person in question.
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Theres been less buzz about this England team than any other before a major championship in my lifetime. No chance itll get 7.61million and it will be beaten by Eurovision. Eurovisions been terrible as usual so far, a rubbish entry from the UK with no chance of winning and Graham Norton trying so hard to be as funny as Terry Wogan but not as good as the great man himself.”

This is a strange comment to come from the one person in this thread who's still defending The Voice

SamuelW
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“This is a strange comment to come from the one person in this thread who's still defending The Voice

”

At least the contestants in The Voice can sing for a start
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“At least the contestants in The Voice can sing for a start ”

Actually, that could be a great way to boost the ratings for The Voice live shows next year - get Graham Norton to do a pithy commentary.

D.M.N.
26-05-2012
Zeebox has Eurovision trending far ahead of the Football.
Andy23
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Zeebox has Eurovision trending far ahead of the Football.”

I think that's a given, Eurovision is the type of show Twitter was designed for.
Cent
26-05-2012
It's 9.20pm and only one ad break in Eurovision so far, lasting around 60 seconds - covered by interviewing the Hump. Why do commercial broadcasters agree to that? Especially those that only have one channel and must broadcast both semi-finals in primetime too. That's a lot of ad revenue to lose - and what to gain?
Brekkie
26-05-2012
I'm sure they used to have more during the performances - is it possible some countries take breaks during the "postcards"?

I guess in countries like Sweden though where the selection process is a big deal they can rake in the cash during that and therefore afford to sacrifice the ads for the contest itself.
Cent
26-05-2012
To answer my own question!... I can only assume its because to be in the EBU you need to be a public service broadcaster and so this, bizarrely, must count as a bit of public service broadcasting.
Chris1964
26-05-2012
Well it seems the football will end.........and there will be Jedward waiting to confuse the nation yet again.
Fudd
26-05-2012
The football has finished one song before Jedward perform. The BBC will like that.
Fudd
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Cent:
“To answer my own question!... I can only assume its because to be in the EBU you need to be a public service broadcaster and so this, bizarrely, must count as a bit of public service broadcasting.”

And some hold their own national finals which bring in revenue and offset the losses of the grand final week. But it explains why ITV haven't exactly been biting the BBC's hand off to air it.
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“I'm sure they used to have more during the performances - is it possible some countries take breaks during the "postcards"?

I guess in countries like Sweden though where the selection process is a big deal they can rake in the cash during that and therefore afford to sacrifice the ads for the contest itself.”

Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“Well it seems the football will end.........and there will be Jedward waiting to confuse the nation yet again.”

Now there's a good place to stick the commercials
Brekkie
26-05-2012
Do we know what the European/Worldwide ratings are for Eurovision usually. They said 120m at the beginning of the show, which would be on a par with the Champions League final (anyone seen a European ratings for that yet?) and above the Superbowl - but we all know these events overstate how many people are watching.
iaindb
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“Do we know what the European/Worldwide ratings are for Eurovision usually. They said 120m at the beginning of the show, which would be on a par with the Champions League final (anyone seen a European ratings for that yet?) and above the Superbowl - but we all know these events overstate how many people are watching.”

I wonder what the ratings are in Azerbaijan. It's 2 o'clock in the morning over there right now.
SamuelW
26-05-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“Do we know what the European/Worldwide ratings are for Eurovision usually. They said 120m at the beginning of the show, which would be on a par with the Champions League final (anyone seen a European ratings for that yet?) and above the Superbowl - but we all know these events overstate how many people are watching.”

69million people on average watched the Eurovision 2010 final: http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?i...d_of_2007_2008

Dont believe the 120million stuff figures, it's exaggerated to make the contest look more popular than it actually is. The Champions League Final is still Europe's premiere event.
<<
<
103 of 159
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map