Originally Posted by Carlisle156:
“I definitely think all questions that we were asked were good & they each tackled a different aspect of the task.
The only thing i'm going to say - and it's not like, an insult, it's more of a question, is that one viewer asked a question in regards to my prescense (because I was absent on Monday as y'all know) as a way of understanding the teams unity. I'm not saying that team unity isn't important, because it definitely is, however I do questions their motives of asking such a question? Are they supposed to be voting on the wider picture, or just what they see?”
The viewers weren't given specific parameters on which to base their votes. If a viewer did feel that the contributions on one team were lopsided (and I'm not saying that they were, or that any viewers did vote on this basis), they can choose to reflect that or not in their vote.
Originally Posted by Satanel:
“In this instance, I have to agree with Louise in that I’m not exactly positive that the criticism towards our celebrity sponsorship acts was completely fair. Whilst understanding why the question may have been asked in the first place, I, and the rest of Team Viveza, stand by that the decision to use Ellie Goulding was an appropriate one, backed up with valid points explained in the presentation.”
Speaking of the celebrity sponsors, I heard that one or two of the choices caused some issues. Can anybody tell me about that?