|
||||||||
Adele 21 Re-release. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,338
|
Adele 21 Re-release.
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/ne...ew-tracks.html
Ffs, why? Just to get more money for the record company and her?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,940
|
I hated re-releases i think there a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,554
|
Rereleases are hardly a new thing but I suppose it's something else to bash Adele for
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
Rereleases are hardly a new thing but I suppose it's something else to bash Adele for
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,796
|
I was waiting for this to happen.
It's sad that her labels main reason behind this re-release is to beat Queen. "21" has amazingly well for an album that's only been out just over a year and they should just leave it at that. It will easily beat Oasis and will probably surpass Abba in time and that's without a re-release. I guess all the records Adele has broken so far just isn't enough for her label. They should just keep whatever tracks they want to include on this re-issue and either put them on her next album or release an EP. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,554
|
Quote:
I'm not bashing her, just re-releases in general. At least with some re-releases you get another cd and live tracks.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DS
Posts: 3,101
|
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo not 21 being best selling album of 2011 and 2012 but now with this re-release it will 2013 and 2014!!!! Lord have mercy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 719
|
It is being reported in the dAily star and they say they are discussing it. No where in that article gives light to it being greenlit.
The song she has done for the en of the year which will be for 'Skyfall'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 4,638
|
Id be very surprised if this happened. And considering the source is the Daily Star I would take it with a very large pinch of salt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Penryn, Falmouth, Cornwall.
Posts: 10,034
|
i hope this does not happen, it will ruin her and it doesn't make any sense. the album has performed exceptionally well without massive physical promotion on her part. so to end this albums life span with a cheap cashing seems to go against the way they have played the promotion process so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,817
|
Im actually for a re release providing it offers value for money as in at least 3-4 brand new songs and some live performances.
I havnt bought the album yet as i said i would wait and see if a re release will happen, so i will hold off buying the album until this is confirmed or denied. A proper re release with value for money could indeed see 21 become the biggest selling album in the UK ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Somewhere extremely creepy
Posts: 3,088
|
Seriously, anyone is surprised by this? Adele's album is a cash cow for her label and they will exploit this as much as possible.
Perhaps her label don't have much confidence in the prospects of her next album, which will presumably be imaginatively titled 24? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Somewhere extremely creepy
Posts: 3,088
|
Quote:
Sorry, didn't mean you inparticular -was referring to the serial Adele-bashers that frequent these forums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,771
|
I thought the album was called 21 because of her age. Should it be rereleased with extra tracks wouldn't the name have to change?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
I hated re-releases i think there a waste of time.
Quote:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/ne...ew-tracks.html
Ffs, why? Just to get more money for the record company and her? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
Im actually for a re release providing it offers value for money as in at least 3-4 brand new songs and some live performances.
I havnt bought the album yet as i said i would wait and see if a re release will happen, so i will hold off buying the album until this is confirmed or denied. A proper re release with value for money could indeed see 21 become the biggest selling album in the UK ever. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
i hope this does not happen, it will ruin her and it doesn't make any sense. the album has performed exceptionally well without massive physical promotion on her part. so to end this albums life span with a cheap cashing seems to go against the way they have played the promotion process so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
I hated re-releases i think there a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
People moaning about re-releases again
It's simple, don't like the idea of them then simply do not buy them |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,253
|
I'm not a fan of re-releases. It's a bit of an insult to fans who've already paid for the first issue of the album. I don't mind deluxe versions when they are released at the same time, but re-releases are just annoying.
If there was some form of system where you could return your original copy of the album in exchange for the re-release (and pay the difference), that would be good - but no such system exists, or ever will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,200
|
Quote:
I'm not a fan of re-releases. It's a bit of an insult to fans who've already paid for the first issue of the album. I don't mind deluxe versions when they are released at the same time, but re-releases are just annoying.
If there was some form of system where you could return your original copy of the album in exchange for the re-release (and pay the difference), that would be good - but no such system exists, or ever will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
I'm not a fan of re-releases. It's a bit of an insult to fans who've already paid for the first issue of the album. I don't mind deluxe versions when they are released at the same time, but re-releases are just annoying.
If there was some form of system where you could return your original copy of the album in exchange for the re-release (and pay the difference), that would be good - but no such system exists, or ever will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ignoringtrollsville
Posts: 7,875
|
Sort of agree but to be fair this deluxe edition of '21' is good value for those who don't own a copy, lol.
http://hmv.com/hmvweb/displayProduct...;-1&sku=262343 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,076
|
Urgh really.
I didn't want the album first time round, and I still don't want it |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In England
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
Urgh really.
I didn't want the album first time round, and I still don't want it |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:32.


