Originally Posted by geordielady:
“The problem is many artists want writing credits for doing next to nothing, wasn't this the case with angels where blobby willliams got writing credits for adding a full stop or something when in fact guy chambers wrote the song but on paper its stated as co-written and i think even with williams name listed first.”
“The problem is many artists want writing credits for doing next to nothing, wasn't this the case with angels where blobby willliams got writing credits for adding a full stop or something when in fact guy chambers wrote the song but on paper its stated as co-written and i think even with williams name listed first.”
Stories have varied on this over time. The first and most plausible that I have heard is that Guy Chambers wrote Angels but there was line he was unhappy with and Robbie suggested changing it to "as the feeling grows she breathes flesh to my bones" which Chambers thought was great and thus Williams got his credit.
Originally Posted by toanythingtaboo:
“I think, typically, people's problem with it is that "co-writing" covers all manner of sins. Someone could have written 99% of the song or less than 1%, and still get the same credit. Then there's buying songwriting credits.
But...that's when you have to engage a bit of common sense. If the "co-writer" in question has not written anything by themselves, and/or has about 2 songwriting credits to their name...the chances are that they probably didn't contribute much.”
“I think, typically, people's problem with it is that "co-writing" covers all manner of sins. Someone could have written 99% of the song or less than 1%, and still get the same credit. Then there's buying songwriting credits.
But...that's when you have to engage a bit of common sense. If the "co-writer" in question has not written anything by themselves, and/or has about 2 songwriting credits to their name...the chances are that they probably didn't contribute much.”
Originally Posted by Zack06:
“There shouldn't be so much emphasis on someone being a 'songwriter' if they are getting someone to hold their hand during the process. Fair enough if they've never called themselves a songwriter, or the artist has just decided to have a hand in creating the music, but for me the issue is when artists and their fans/promoters etc run around calling them(selves) a songwriter as if they create all the music themselves, when in fact there has been at least one other person involved (sometimes heavily) in the process.”
“There shouldn't be so much emphasis on someone being a 'songwriter' if they are getting someone to hold their hand during the process. Fair enough if they've never called themselves a songwriter, or the artist has just decided to have a hand in creating the music, but for me the issue is when artists and their fans/promoters etc run around calling them(selves) a songwriter as if they create all the music themselves, when in fact there has been at least one other person involved (sometimes heavily) in the process.”
I don't think it's that simple. One of my favourite artist has written a handful of songs completely by himself, a handful by written others but most is co-written. He generaly refers to himself as a songwriter in interviews and such but get him in a more in depth interview and he will openly say x track was mainly from his mind and y track was mainly from that of his collaborator. Does that mean he isn't a songwriter or shouldn't be classed/marketed as one?




.