|
||||||||
coincidence of terrible female contestants this year |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
I doubt they expected the women to perform as poorly as they did : Jane was much stronger on paper and in terms of her personal presentation than the utter trainwreck she turned out to be; Laura got overtaken by events outside of her control to a certain extent; Katie could have done better if she'd paced herself more sensibly, not started too slowly than gone hell-for-leather in order to course correct. Maria and Jenna were both out of their depths, but I would guess they were expected to be. Gabrielle outperformed most of her "type" except arguably Lucinda, but not by much and she got lucky to make it as far as she did, likability aside. Bilyana didn't register much for me - she was abrasive and didn't back it up with strong sales like other mouthy Apprentice Sales-Bitches.
Jade is...fine. She's nothing inspirational, and only tends to register any screentime as a Project Manager, but she's no worse than Lohit or Ansell or James or some of the other vaguely pointless males to make Final Five. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
I'm not saying Laura and Gabrielle aren't attractive. Even Jane was attractive in a sense. However note that I used the phrase, "especially attractive". Those three are not "wow" attractive, or even "sit-up-and-take notice" attractive, as Bilyana and Katie, or some of the even more drop dead gorgeous US contestants are. They don't have that striking, camera friendly "look" - they're simply sort of "normally pretty", if that makes sense.
Katie isn't my personal idea of what is good-looking - as I've said a number of times she does nothing for me. I'm trying to take an objective view and from that angle I think a couple more like her, hopefully lasting into the final stages, would have added more general interest to a jaded series, even though she was just as bland an on-screen presence as most of the rest of them. I'm not advocating that looks should be the defining criteria, but in the complete absence of the likes of a Badger or a Saeed, I'm left clutching at straws. Any port in a storm I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12,218
|
Quote:
As ever, I'm left marvelling at the difference in perceptions of beauty, as to me Laura was more attractive than Katie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
As ever, I'm left marvelling at the difference in perceptions of beauty, as to me Laura was more attractive than Katie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16,500
|
Quote:
Sorry, my mistake. I meant Kate (Walsh) not Katie (Hopkins) although I agree with Penelope Simpson - Laura was sort of "blandly pretty" if that makes sense. In common with a lot of the contestants she had an uninteresting personality (at least on the show).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,239
|
Quote:
I was referring to this years Katie - the blonde assassin. Kate Walsh was more attractive than any of this years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,412
|
Quote:
And again personal perception plays a part. I know I'm female but to me, Katie from series 8 is more attractive than either Kate Walsh or Katie Hopkins (who I'd say (while not being unattractive) is rather an acquired taste) and Laura is possibly more attractive than all three and definitely more attractive than either of the latter two.
I'd say the gender of the beholder also plays a part in perceptions of attractiveness. In my experience women often have a different idea than most men about the relative attractiveness of other women. The reverse is true with men of course. Many of my male friends are often baffled by some men in the public eye who are perceived as attractive by women - the character with the senile wife in Coronation Street is one example that springs to mind. IIRC he played a character in Hollyoaks and female reviewers and female FMs here were forever banging on about how "dreamy" he was, which I and other guys I know found completely bizarre. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
Gabrielle outperformed most of her "type" except arguably Lucinda, but not by much and she got lucky to make it as far as she did, likability aside.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33.


