|
||||||||
Interview Episode |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 426
|
Interview Episode
Why aren't they having one this year?
One of my favourite bits
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,221
|
It was in the final last year
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
|
It will be the final again which I don't like
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
|
sir alan investing in their business has for me made the show boring
he just goes for the one whose business plan he likes the most (he obviously look at them before, shooses the four he likes the most and already know they will get to the final, cause why is that blonde guy still there) i really wanted dwayne to be in the final or in the case of tom a whole different business plan and i liked it when they brought back the peope who got fired to help on the final task still love the interviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 426
|
love the interviews, glad they do still happen but agreed the final without a task is sillly
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,018
|
Quote:
love the interviews, glad they do still happen but agreed the final without a task is sillly
The interviews of the business plans obviously are key to Sir Alan in deciding who he'll hire, fundamental in fact. So the last task has meaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
I disagree. When the final was the regular task, it was never decided on the last task. That's why they stopped measuring the task on how much money they made after two years. Because both times, the person who had made less money (Tim & Michelle) had been hired.
The interviews of the business plans obviously are key to Sir Alan in deciding who he'll hire, fundamental in fact. So the last task has meaning. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27
|
Show us the plans
They should give us an overview of the candidate's plans. This would be more involving for us viewers and make the programme more interesting and give an insight into why a candidate might win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,892
|
^agreed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 34,226
|
Quote:
Agreed. Having the interviews as the final show may be less entertaining - although I always like them - but it is far more relevant given that the prize is all about the quality of the business plans, which require an interview process to really dig into. What more is one more task (where Sugar would ignore any quantitative result anyway) going to tell anyone?
At the other extreme, the interviewers found fault with Susan's plans and figures and she was rejected on that argument. However, that seems to have been a complete red herring as he later bought into her proposal. The whole point of having Lord Sugar involved was to sort out the bigger issues that the candidates lacked the support and experience to do - so an awful lot of issues that the interviewers find with the plans are going to be similarly irrelevant. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33.

One of my favourite bits

