Originally Posted by Lowri:
“Hi Sue_C, how would you say American Gods compares to Stardust? I loved Stardust but I know his writing style is unusual to say the least! What about it made it less enjoyable than Stardust? I have America Gods on my reader but I've had too many books out of the library to read my own for ages.”
Hi Lowri, oh dear I'm going to have to think about this now! So, in no particular order,
I did enjoy American Gods and I do think that it's worth a read. I personally found it a more difficult read than Neverwhere & Stardust, it may be a cultural thing as I'm not a great expert on the USA geographically, nor really lifestyle wise apart from TV programmes! I soon became totally lost somewhere in America and a better knowledge of Norse mythology would have been an advantage too. The basic premise to the book is that immigrants to the USA over hundreds or even thousands of years brought their old gods and belief systems with them and now the old gods are battling for supremacy between themselves and also against the new gods of commercialism, tv, internet etc. Gods need believers to survive and be strong (a Terry Pratchett theme too). Added into the mix is mystery, murder, quirky characters and some love interest (I think, from memory).
Stardust and Neverwhere both have quite a light and "romantic" feel to them, even when horrible things happen. American Gods feels darker and is less straightforward. I think that Stardust is an archetypal fairytale and it's easy to read because it follows that pattern.
Neverwhere is about falling between the cracks and again, it's simpler than American Gods. It appealed to me because I enjoy books about London. I loved the characterisation of place names, there really is an Angel called Islington, Blackfriars are monks, Old Bailey is an old man who likes rooftops. I was hooked from the start, American Gods took a long time to get into.
Well, I hope that makes sense. Another enjoyable Neil Gaiman read is Anansi Boys by the way.