• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
The Archers!
<<
<
120 of 210
>>
>
Safi74
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“Hurrah for Pat! Fantastic ending there, up against Tony's appeasing guff.

She's absolutely right - how dare the depraved scum turn up and start amending the court order he insisted on. ”

I was rather hoping Pat would finish what Helen had started!
Welsh-lad
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Safi74:
“I was rather hoping Pat would finish what Helen had started! ”

A shame they got rid of the bull that attacked Tony. His enclosure could have been 'clumsily' left open as Rob was leaving.
gomezz
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“in other news, why is Clarrie in a permanent state of shrill alarm?”

The Grundys are just about to made homeless again.
Welsh-lad
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“The Grundys are just about to made homeless again.”

Eddie should adapt a shepherd's hut for them all to live in
sam_gee
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by gomezz:
“The Grundys are just about to made homeless again.”


Hasn't Will said they can live in some cottage he owns?

Clarrie must be worrying about what Oliver and Caroline will say when they return to their trashed house though
Safi74
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“A shame they got rid of the bull that attacked Tony. His enclosure could have been 'clumsily' left open as Rob was leaving.”

Ha ha ha! If only!
Anne_Cameron
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“ She's absolutely right - how dare the depraved scum turn up and start amending the court order he insisted on. ”

I think the Court Order said that Pat and Tony should have him one day a week without mentioning a specific day of the week.

I would have reacted in the same way as Pat, but Tony is right you have to be seen to be being fair and reasonable particularly with the next court hearing coming up.
fredster
14-06-2016
Originally Posted by Anne_Cameron:
“I think the Court Order said that Pat and Tony should have him one day a week without mentioning a specific day of the week.

I would have reacted in the same way as Pat, but Tony is right you have to be seen to be being fair and reasonable particularly with the next court hearing coming up.”

Especially as they have the chance to have him over night. It could go in their favour at the court hearing?
Welsh-lad
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by Anne_Cameron:
“I think the Court Order said that Pat and Tony should have him one day a week without mentioning a specific day of the week.

I would have reacted in the same way as Pat, but Tony is right you have to be seen to be being fair and reasonable particularly with the next court hearing coming up.”

Originally Posted by fredster:
“Especially as they have the chance to have him over night. It could go in their favour at the court hearing?”

As if Rob doesn't have some kind of ulterior motive.
I wouldn't trust the snake - he's probably trying to trap them in some way.
fredster
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“As if Rob doesn't have some kind of ulterior motive.
I wouldn't trust the snake - he's probably trying to trap them in some way.”

Yes he might saytheykept him overnight. I would get him to sign something to say he wanted this .
Anne_Cameron
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“As if Rob doesn't have some kind of ulterior motive.
I wouldn't trust the snake - he's probably trying to trap them in some way.”

Totally agree but if they do not play ball on this one particularly as he is waving the 'It's what Henry wants' card, then his legal team will use it against Helen in the next custody hearing citing her parents' unreasonable management of the child care situation and not having in mind Henry's best interests.

As another poster has said, the opportunity to have Henry stay overnight might have ultimately gone in Pat & Tony's favour at the hearing.

Rob may well have had the whole scenario outlined to him by his lawyers in order to show what a fair, reasonable and caring parent he is who is willing to compromise in the best interests of Henry (and Jack too.)
sam_gee
15-06-2016
If Henry stays over with Pat and Tony, might he get to meet the new baby if Tony's bringing him to see Pat?
fredster
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“If Henry stays over with Pat and Tony, might he get to meet the new baby if Tony's bringing him to see Pat?”

Isn't Pat going there, but not to see Helen?
fredster
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“If Henry stays over with Pat and Tony, might he get to meet the new baby if Tony's bringing him to see Pat?”

Rob would go mad.
postit
15-06-2016
I was willing Pat to mention to Rabid Rob that she was going to see the baby - heh
Welsh-lad
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by Anne_Cameron:
“Totally agree but if they do not play ball on this one particularly as he is waving the 'It's what Henry wants' card, then his legal team will use it against Helen in the next custody hearing citing her parents' unreasonable management of the child care situation and not having in mind Henry's best interests.

As another poster has said, the opportunity to have Henry stay overnight might have ultimately gone in Pat & Tony's favour at the hearing.

Rob may well have had the whole scenario outlined to him by his lawyers in order to show what a fair, reasonable and caring parent he is who is willing to compromise in the best interests of Henry (and Jack too.)”

If it must happen they must record him (on a smartphone or something) giving explicit permission and have him sign a legal paper to the same effect.
I simply don't trust him or his foul harpy of a mother not to concoct a phoney account of how the Archers took Henry overnight without leave etc.
sam_gee
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by fredster:
“Isn't Pat going there, but not to see Helen?”

If that's the case and it's on the right day, would there be anything to stop Pat taking Henry along? Rob would go mad wouldn't he?
Anne_Cameron
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“If it must happen they must record him (on a smartphone or something) giving explicit permission and have him sign a legal paper to the same effect.
I simply don't trust him or his foul harpy of a mother not to concoct a phoney account of how the Archers took Henry overnight without leave etc.”

Absolutely, or have a witness there who can verify what Rob has said about the overnight stay.

Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“If that's the case and it's on the right day, would there be anything to stop Pat taking Henry along? Rob would go mad wouldn't he? ”

Now that would be a plan! Henry returning to Blossom Hill Cottage with tales of baby Jack, Rob wouldn't be able to contain himself.
Welsh-lad
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“If that's the case and it's on the right day, would there be anything to stop Pat taking Henry along? Rob would go mad wouldn't he? ”

Originally Posted by Anne_Cameron:
“Now that would be a plan! Henry returning to Blossom Hill Cottage with tales of baby Jack, Rob wouldn't be able to contain himself.”

Yes yes yes
sam_gee
15-06-2016
Phoebe is a cheeky mare and a misery guts
fredster
15-06-2016
Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“Phoebe is a cheeky mare and a misery guts ”

And Kate is a spoilt brat.
postit
16-06-2016
Oh Tony For pity's sake man, get it in writing! You KNOW Rabid rob is going to use this against you in court.
sam_gee
16-06-2016
Dear Phoebe, could you clarify your age please? I'm not sure if you're 18 or 80.
fredster
16-06-2016
Originally Posted by sam_gee:
“Dear Phoebe, could you clarify your age please? I'm not sure if you're 18 or 80.”

And is Kate 14 or 40.
sam_gee
16-06-2016
Originally Posted by fredster:
“And is Kate 14 or 40.”



Poor Kate, it must be awful for her having such a miserable dullard as a daughter
<<
<
120 of 210
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map