The Leveson Inquiry: Culture, Practices & Ethics of the Press, 2012 (Part 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1052 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Afternoon all
![]() ![]() Missed Clegg - had some business to conduct. Watching the commons, so will miss Salmond as well. Can't multitask so have to choose one to watch. Had a quick read of the thread from when I left it. Anyone care to update me on any interesting points that came up in Clegg's evidence. It will be much appreciated. Harmon talking in the commons now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1053 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Cameron wrote to Sir Alex Allan (the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests) and received a reply from him.
http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/sir-alex-allan/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#1054 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1055 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,865
|
Maybe Alex Allen missed the decision announced on the media 20 mins after Hunt left the witness box at Leveson almost two weeks ago?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1056 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Emley Moor
Posts: 330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1057 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Speaker losing the house now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1058 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Audreys Salon
Services: Shampoo and Set
Posts: 4,108
|
Hunt looking like a startled rabbit in a very tetchy HofC!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1059 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, Notts, UK
Services: Freeview
Posts: 3,470
|
I'm finding this amusing, since I don't like either Harman or Hunt...
|
|
|
|
|
#1060 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
|
Roll on 2 o'clock and Alex Salmond.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1061 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Services: Virgin Cable
Posts: 59,698
|
Hunt was quite flustered and got his words badly mixed up when he wanted to suggest that Labour were OK with Labour Ministers breaking the Code but not Conservative Ministers...........but he said it the wrong way round
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1062 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Services: Virgin Cable
Posts: 59,698
|
Salmond has started...............I'm switching to that
the debate in the house is going to be predictable if fiery and the result of the vote is already known in advance............... |
|
|
|
|
|
#1063 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Labour saying it's inconceivable to say that a Minister didn't know what their Spads were up to. And yet Gordon Brown at Leveson was adamant he didn't know anything about the misdeeds his Spads got up to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1064 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
|
You have a point and what his spads were accused of was disgusting. There is a difference here though and that is that the spad of the Minister who was supposed to be overseeing a multi billion pound deal in a quasi judicial way made contact with one side in the deal not once or twice but five hundred times How could Hunt not have known that was going on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1065 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14,808
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1066 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1067 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
|
Alex Salmond certainly is a charmer and and interesting speaker.
Leveson's reference to the "English Parliament" and Salmond's response was hilarious. I must say that I hadn't thought about how any of Levson's decisions would impact the Scottish legal system. Shocked that the Observer got into Salmond's bank account and were going to make much of a purchase by him from a toy shop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1068 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
|
I'd forgotten that Salmond tried to have Blair impeached.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1069 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
Just realised I've gone off topic on this thread. Will leave and go to another thread, Apologise for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1070 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
|
Jay comments that hardly any of Salmond's comments in his witness statement are political in content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1071 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
|
That still makes Jeremy Hunt responsible. He appointed him. He said that he worked closer to him than any other minister and spad. How didn't he know that his special advisor who you think was a rank amateur was involved in all this illicit contact and was basically making their conduct open to an expensive appeal by those opposed to the bid?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1072 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
|
Salmond commends Leveson on his Gaelic pronunciation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1073 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14,808
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1074 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1075 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
|
Leaving that aside. Hunt and his spad were dealing not with something purely political but a multi billion pound deal with far reaching consequences. The problem is, as you have conceded this was dealt with in a highly incompetent way. If a minister is dealing in something in a quasi judicial way he has to not only put his prejudices aside he has to be seen to be acting in a way that is not prejudicial to one side. Had those opposed to this bid taken the decision to appeal and all the texts and emails come to light it is hard to see how they could have lost their case. That is just one reason why Hunt should have known what was going on.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28.





