Forums
 

The Leveson Inquiry: Culture, Practices & Ethics of the Press, 2012 (Part 2)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-06-2012, 13:20   #1051
trew
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Emley Moor
Posts: 330
Harriet Harman speaking in the commons now.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/...00/9434799.stm
trew is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-06-2012, 13:21   #1052
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Afternoon all

Missed Clegg - had some business to conduct.

Watching the commons, so will miss Salmond as well. Can't multitask so have to choose one to watch.

Had a quick read of the thread from when I left it. Anyone care to update me on any interesting points that came up in Clegg's evidence. It will be much appreciated.

Harmon talking in the commons now.
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:24   #1053
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Cameron wrote to Sir Alex Allan (the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests) and received a reply from him.

http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/sir-alex-allan/
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:31   #1054
Transient1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnsleykeith View Post
Cameron wrote to Sir Alex Allan (the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests) and received a reply from him.

http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/sir-alex-allan/
Strange that he should write to him today. If it would have influenced the parliamentary vote and the Lib Dems decision to abstain why didn't he do this earlier? It's beginning to look as if Sir Alex is being treated like a useful idiot.
Transient1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:34   #1055
glasshalffull
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transient1 View Post
Strange that he should write to him today. If it would have influenced the parliamentary vote and the Lib Dems decision to abstain why didn't he do this earlier? It's beginning to look as if Sir Alex is being treated like a useful idiot.
Maybe Alex Allen missed the decision announced on the media 20 mins after Hunt left the witness box at Leveson almost two weeks ago?
glasshalffull is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:36   #1056
trew
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Emley Moor
Posts: 330
Hunt now replying.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/...00/9434799.stm

What a bunch of children.
trew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:42   #1057
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Speaker losing the house now.
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:47   #1058
SallyArmy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Audreys Salon
Services: Shampoo and Set
Posts: 4,108
Hunt looking like a startled rabbit in a very tetchy HofC!!
SallyArmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:53   #1059
Cryolemon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newark, Notts, UK
Services: Freeview
Posts: 3,470
I'm finding this amusing, since I don't like either Harman or Hunt...
Cryolemon is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 13:54   #1060
Annsyre
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
Roll on 2 o'clock and Alex Salmond.
Annsyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:07   #1061
swingaleg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Services: Virgin Cable
Posts: 59,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by SallyArmy View Post
Hunt looking like a startled rabbit in a very tetchy HofC!!
Hunt was quite flustered and got his words badly mixed up when he wanted to suggest that Labour were OK with Labour Ministers breaking the Code but not Conservative Ministers...........but he said it the wrong way round
swingaleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:12   #1062
swingaleg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Services: Virgin Cable
Posts: 59,698
Salmond has started...............I'm switching to that

the debate in the house is going to be predictable if fiery and the result of the vote is already known in advance...............
swingaleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:17   #1063
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Labour saying it's inconceivable to say that a Minister didn't know what their Spads were up to. And yet Gordon Brown at Leveson was adamant he didn't know anything about the misdeeds his Spads got up to.
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:26   #1064
Transient1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnsleykeith View Post
Labour saying it's inconceivable to say that a Minister didn't know what their Spads were up to. And yet Gordon Brown at Leveson was adamant he didn't know anything about the misdeeds his Spads got up to.
You have a point and what his spads were accused of was disgusting. There is a difference here though and that is that the spad of the Minister who was supposed to be overseeing a multi billion pound deal in a quasi judicial way made contact with one side in the deal not once or twice but five hundred times How could Hunt not have known that was going on?
Transient1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:38   #1065
planetnokia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transient1 View Post
You have a point and what his spads were accused of was disgusting. There is a difference here though and that is that the spad of the Minister who was supposed to be overseeing a multi billion pound deal in a quasi judicial way made contact with one side in the deal not once or twice but five hundred times How could Hunt not have known that was going on?
Yes...there is a difference here. Jeremy Hunt's SpAd was a rank amateur who was totally out of his depth as regards process whereas Gordon Brown's SpAds were spreading disgusting lies about the private lives of fellow and opposition MPs.
planetnokia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:39   #1066
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transient1 View Post
You have a point and what his spads were accused of was disgusting. There is a difference here though and that is that the spad of Minister who was supposed to be overseeing a multi billion pound deal in a quasi judicial way made contact with one side in the deal not once or twice but five hundred times How could Hunt not have known that was going on?
You are quite right to point out the different circumstances between Brown & Hunt. I personally can't believe that both Brown or Hunt were not aware of what their Spads were up to. That's why I think Hunt should accept responsibility and resign. And I thought Brown should have done the same over McBride. ie resigned. That's why the Labour accusations come across as hypocritical to me.
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:39   #1067
Annsyre
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
Alex Salmond certainly is a charmer and and interesting speaker.

Leveson's reference to the "English Parliament" and Salmond's response was hilarious.

I must say that I hadn't thought about how any of Levson's decisions would impact the Scottish legal system.

Shocked that the Observer got into Salmond's bank account and were going to make much of a purchase by him from a toy shop.
Annsyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:42   #1068
Annsyre
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
I'd forgotten that Salmond tried to have Blair impeached.
Annsyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:42   #1069
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Just realised I've gone off topic on this thread. Will leave and go to another thread, Apologise for that.
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:47   #1070
Annsyre
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
Jay comments that hardly any of Salmond's comments in his witness statement are political in content.
Annsyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:48   #1071
Transient1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnokia View Post
Yes...there is a difference here. Jeremy Hunt's SpAd was a rank amateur who was totally out of his depth as regards process whereas Gordon Brown's SpAds were spreading disgusting lies about the private lives of fellow and opposition MPs.
That still makes Jeremy Hunt responsible. He appointed him. He said that he worked closer to him than any other minister and spad. How didn't he know that his special advisor who you think was a rank amateur was involved in all this illicit contact and was basically making their conduct open to an expensive appeal by those opposed to the bid?
Transient1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:52   #1072
Annsyre
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 68,450
Salmond commends Leveson on his Gaelic pronunciation.
Annsyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 14:52   #1073
planetnokia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transient1 View Post
That still makes Jeremy hunt responsible. He appointed him. He said that he worked closer to him than any other spad. How didn't he know that his special advisor who you think was a rank amateur was involved in all this illicit contact and was basically making their conduct open to an expensive appeal by those opposed to the bid?
The trouble is that 13 years of New Labour in government set a precedent....no Labour politician ever took responsibility and resigned.
planetnokia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 15:01   #1074
barnsleykeith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnokia View Post
The trouble is that 13 years of New Labour in government set a precedent....no Labour politician ever took responsibility and resigned.
Robin Cook, Mandelson, Beverly Hughes, Peter Hain??
barnsleykeith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2012, 15:05   #1075
Transient1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnokia View Post
The trouble is that 13 years of New Labour in government set a precedent....no Labour politician ever took responsibility and resigned.
Leaving that aside. Hunt and his spad were dealing not with something purely political but a multi billion pound deal with far reaching consequences. The problem is, as you have conceded this was dealt with in a highly incompetent way. If a minister is dealing in something in a quasi judicial way he has to not only put his prejudices aside he has to be seen to be acting in a way that is not prejudicial to one side. Had those opposed to this bid taken the decision to appeal and all the texts and emails come to light it is hard to see how they could have lost their case. That is just one reason why Hunt should have known what was going on.
Transient1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28.