should the simpsons be cancelled? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Services: Hollyoaks village
Posts: 3,478
|
should the simpsons be cancelled?
with the simpsons going into its 24th season this year has the show overdone its course back in the 90s and early 2000 it was a big thing but slowly the hype has gone and now it just seems stale
i say bring it back for one more short season and concentrate on bringing out 12 amazing episodes with an unforgettable finale before its cancelled with no goodbye episode |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,775
|
It still gets fairly good ratings, it's unlikely to go anywhere for a while. Nobody cares about critical reception otherwise 2 Broke Girls wouldn't have made it past it's first season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,245
|
I consider it beyond conventional means of cancellation. There is too much invested in it e.g merchandise, international broadcasting etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Services: Hollyoaks village
Posts: 3,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London/Kent
Services: Virgin Media
Posts: 265
|
I wouldn't, it's a worldwide cash cow. You'd be an idiot to cancel it.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 13,283
|
It shouldn't be cancelled because despite its appalling ratings, it still rakes in the cash.
However, its contract is up for renewal after season 25 I think, and I suspect it will be the last season. I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but Marge's voice has really changed over the last few years and I vaguely recall Julie Kavner saying she finds it really difficult to do nowadays and they've essentially removed Patty and Selma from the cast for the same reason as she does all three. It'll be things like that which end the show rather than just it's reduced quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Services: Hollyoaks village
Posts: 3,478
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mayo,IRE
Posts: 3,104
|
I think FOX might be starting to worry about the ratings.
This year FOX's animation domination went very low, and Family Guy had its lowest viewed season yet...but it was also the first year Family Guy started to beat Family Guy in the ratings. So consider that Family Guy had its lowest rated season but still managed to beat The Simpsons for the first time....they must be worried |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norfolk, UK
Services: SKY+
Posts: 3,925
|
What annoys me is how everyone harps on and on about how its the longest running cartoon because it started in 1989 yet people have a bad case of amnesia and forget TMNT started in 1987 2 years earlier.
granted the Turtles cartoon wasent on yearly but their new series starts in 2013 and a film too so it outranks them in terms of a longer cartoon. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 673
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: In the southstand
Posts: 48,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Twin Peaks
Posts: 35,428
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Mayo,IRE
Posts: 3,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,878
|
It's not just ratings or quality. It's extra revenue. The merchendise, the DVDs etc. Have to work bloody hard to get an asset like the Simpsons that can shill stuff so easily as they can. You don't dump Mickey Mouse because the cartoons aren't any longer that interesting to people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Services: Hollyoaks village
Posts: 3,478
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 32
|
They probably should, but I doubt they will. Like it has been said, it's a great method of making money due to merchandising. I used to think the new episodes were viewed in too harsh a light a few years back, but now the newer episodes truly are woeful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,021
|
There will be a point where producing new episodes and paying huge salaries is pointless when they can air reruns (508 episodes to date) for decades to come and keep the brand relevant.
They can also keep relevant with movies, straight to DVD releases and Treehouse of Horror specials. I think this season had some of the lowest rated episodes ever (just over 4 million viewers). But it's still one of the most expensive shows to advertise on. I think it's got at least another 5 years in it to be honest before it goes to reruns. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Over there
Posts: 7,381
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,090
|
Quote:
ratings, (only 4.79 million watched the Lady Gaga episode less than "Family Guy" http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...les-up/135161/ ) this will keep probably the show going, unless one of the lead actors decides to quit the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,090
|
I just found this piece of info- a short, dialogue-free Simpson film featuring Maggie will
be released: Quote:
A glimpse into the show's future? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,775
|
Family Guy is the best positioned scripted show on Fox and The Simpsons was 4th according to TV By The Numbers. Given that the Cleveland Show (Fox's 4th worst) got renewed, I doubt they'll be going anywhere any time soon (at least not for ratings reasons)/
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,782
|
Short answer: No. I still enjoy it, it's improved ALOT in the last couple of years and still gets fairly good ratings. Also, I doubt Fox would cancel one of their biggest shows, so it would be down to Matt Groening at the end of the day, and he has no desire to end the show yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: I don't know
Services: I'm on a computer
Posts: 5,291
|
No. I think the Simpsons will probably be still around in five years time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 253
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11.





