[hopeless case]

She probably thinks she looks good in this video - I notice she is trying to use reasonable language, and seems to be spouting the popular mantra of "make your own money, don't rely on a man" etc.

However, how repulsive is she? Sticking her nose into this affair! Videoing it and sending it to the papers! Quite apart from the utterly faked and condescending way she talks (because its on tape) AND apart from the hypocrisy shown, she should just butt the hell out.

I remember her on a chat show once - she remarked about someone "She must have a bucket" (to refer to you know where). She pretends to be a strong woman who uses sex to her advantage, for herself etc. Yet all she does is put other women down. She truly is the worst of this society. Urgh, she makes my skin crawl.

[Goldbear86]

The hypocrisy of Jordan telling someone to stop selling stories and get a job!

And then selling the story. Just how thick is she?! Business woman my @rse. She really is beyond stupid! Why on earth is she getting involved with this? It's not her place.

[Nicola32]

Originally Posted by Goldbear86

The hypocrisy of Jordan telling someone to stop selling stories and get a job!

And then selling the story. Just how thick is she?! Business woman my @rse. She really is beyond stupid! Why on earth is she getting involved with this? It's not her place.

Probably because she is peed off that Leo's ex has let the world know that he is a sh*t dad.

Seeing as she is always banging on about how good he is with her kids.

[Amber43]

Originally Posted by fifitrixibelle

Just so i got this right......the latest knob has recorded a conversation with the bone idle leeching gobshite, telling the mother of his child to get a job???

So he's a spineless absent father who's thinks nothing of humiliating his child all for the sake of airplay and money....the grubby pair really do deserve each other.

I'm intrigued to see the excuses trotted out for this

You might have a long wait, it is hard to justify for the sheer irony of it alone

[milly]

What a pair of rotten mastards,mind you,this is what the mother of his child can expect from this pair of cold hearted,egotistical,hypocritical money mad pair of narcs.

[pinkpowerranger]

I wonder how she would have reacted if a girlfriend of Dwight York had rang her up and criticised her for broadcasting what a crap Dad he was and then passed on a recording of that tape to the press. She really has no self awareness at all.

[Goldbear86]

Originally Posted by pinkpowerranger

I wonder how she would have reacted if a girlfriend of Dwight York had rang her up and criticised her for broadcasting what a crap Dad he was and then passed on a recording of that tape to the press. She really has no self awareness at all.

The girlfriend would be labelled a "ugly jealous hater' and then some I'd imagine.

And I say that because KP genuinely seems to dislike other women. She labelled Leo's dance partner ugly to the media! What had she did to KP other than have the misfortune of dancing with Leo?

[milly]

She should keep her plastic nose out of it,mind you,he's a cowardly piece of piss,they deserve each other.

[lexi22]

Originally Posted by Goldbear86

The girlfriend would be labelled a "ugly jealous hater' and then some I'd imagine.

And I say that because KP genuinely seems to dislike other women. She labelled Leo's dance partner ugly to the media! What had she did to KP other than have the misfortune of dancing with Leo?

Actually, what she said was that Leo said she was ugly. Which imo is worse than her saying it, as by repeating it, she dropped Leo right in it and it reflected really badly on him. She just can'r help herself, can she.

And I'm now wondering if that had anything to do with him being voted off first on Argentina's SCD? I can't imagine it made him very popular or would have gone down well with an Argentinian audience.

I know he was a rubbish dancer anyway but still, it can't have improved his chances much...

[Just a little 1]

Watched the program tonight, Harvey is growing up fast, i do like katies dad he seems much fun, katie giving a little squeal while skiing lol, but how Katie threw the hairless cat on the sofa poor kitty

[Valdery]

Originally Posted by Betty Britain

Yes it should... And as there hasn't been an over reaction anywhere except here I'd say they have..

No over reaction here either BB just a statement of what was said by Katie Price and opinions posted on that statement, as is allowed here at DS.

By the way, again I will state there have been other areas (maybe not specifically patrolled by yourself) where there have been complaints/upset at what Katie Price said and they from the parents of disabled children.

There were also complaints to Ofcom and those from people who actually saw the clip and took the trouble to complain. If those people were parents of disabled children then obviously she upset them and should at least afford an explanation or apology. Surely that's what she herself would want if she was offended by another person regarding any of her children but especially Harvey because he is more vulnerable.

I know people on Twitter have asked her to elaborate on the name calling/term Mollie/Molly to which she has not responded. She can take the time to advertise her wares, why not to give an explanation?

[Valdery]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

That's the point. It wasn't aimed at anyone. The scene was about Harvey getting a stylish haircut. The context being she didn't see why he (and other disabled children) shouldn't have one.

Did the see the frog segment with Harvey?

Yes the scene was Harvey getting his hair cut that is quite clear...however, the term was aimed directly at disabled parents and their children.

Katie Price stated that some parents of disabled children dressed them like Mollies. What part of that uncomplimentary statement is not a direct aim at the parents or the disabled offspring? What part of her not wanting that for Harvey is her wishing they could have the same benefits she can afford to give him?

You can put any flowery slant on her statement but cannot deny that these were the spoken words and they were not praise for either the parent or child.

Obviously if you can interpret that statement as you do then we are very different in values and should just leave it at that.

[NotaTypo]

Originally Posted by Valdery

No over reaction here either BB just a statement of what was said by Katie Price and opinions posted on that statement, as is allowed here at DS.

By the way, again I will state there have been other areas (maybe not specifically patrolled by yourself) where there have been complaints/upset at what Katie Price said and they from the parents of disabled children.

There were also complaints to Ofcom and those from people who actually saw the clip and took the trouble to complain. If those people were parents of disabled children then obviously she upset them and should at least afford an explanation or apology. Surely that's what she herself would want if she was offended by another person regarding any of her children but especially Harvey because he is more vulnerable.

I know people on Twitter have asked her to elaborate on the name calling/term Mollie/Molly to which she has not responded. She can take the time to advertise her wares, why not to give an explanation?

Do you have links to these areas?

[butty92]

Never known such an attention seeking woman in my life. She craves fame and celebrity by acting her braindead self and that is rewarded in the society we live in. These 'books' she releases aren't even her own and why anyone would have any interest in a woman that encourages failure is beyond me.

[Ella71110]

just to say that i live in Brighton and yes-molly is a derogatory word-it means that you dress old fashioned or in "trampy" clothes (as my 14 year old daughter said when i asked her to define the word "molly")-we used to say at school that someone was a right "Moll"-it means the same as "molly"-horrible clothes and style,I can see why people are offended

[Ella71110]

Originally Posted by Just a little 1

Oh dear http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrit...leandro-946495

Setting this up and posting online, Adults acting like children

Oh.My.God,-i've only just seen this-shocked you couldn't make it up!

[Glenn A]

Originally Posted by butty92

Never known such an attention seeking woman in my life. She craves fame and celebrity by acting her braindead self and that is rewarded in the society we live in. These 'books' she releases aren't even her own and why anyone would have any interest in a woman that encourages failure is beyond me.

Fortunately her career is in decline, her last mindless reality series only got 100,000 viewers and the papers aren't interested any more.

[janetcomelately]

Originally Posted by Valdery

Yes the scene was Harvey getting his hair cut that is quite clear...however, the term was aimed directly at disabled parents and their children.

Katie Price stated that some parents of disabled children dressed them like Mollies. What part of that uncomplimentary statement is not a direct aim at the parents or the disabled offspring? What part of her not wanting that for Harvey is her wishing they could have the same benefits she can afford to give him?

You can put any flowery slant on her statement but cannot deny that these were the spoken words and they were not praise for either the parent or child.

Obviously if you can interpret that statement as you do then we are very different in values and should just leave it at that.

A direct aim? Hardly, it was a passing comment as you will see if you had watched the whole programme. No intent to harm, just KP being her usual katie-centric self.

Why anyone would bother to get upset by what she says, I don't know, especially when she does so much for Harvey which must count for far more than one sentence from her insensitive gob.

[Amber43]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

A direct aim? Hardly, it was a passing comment as you will see if you had watched the whole programme. No intent to harm, just KP being her usual katie-centric self.

Why anyone would bother to get upset by what she says, I don't know, especially when she does so much for Harvey which must count for far more than one sentence from her insensitive gob.

She's in the public eye, she should be aware that a passing comment per se can be offensive see the quotes above in the thread different people in different parts of the country find some terms offensive... she may do much for Harvey but IMO she's scuppering any good with her complete insensitivity and obliviousness to others, so much for raising awareness basically IMO she taints everything and that can't be a good thing

[fifitrixibelle]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

A direct aim? Hardly, it was a passing comment as you will see if you had watched the whole programme. No intent to harm, just KP being her usual katie-centric self.

Why anyone would bother to get upset by what she says, I don't know, especially when she does so much for Harvey which must count for far more than one sentence from her insensitive gob.

"Most families with a child with disabilities, they dress them really molly and give them molly haircuts"

How is this NOT a direct comment specifically AIMED at families with children with disabilities?????

As long as she continues to make offensive comments about race and disabilities I will continue to be "upset" and am saddened and concerned that so many seem to condone this mentality/

[Betty Britain]

Originally Posted by fifitrixibelle

"Most families with a child with disabilities, they dress them really molly and give them molly haircuts"

How is this NOT a direct comment specifically AIMED at families with children with disabilities?????

As long as she continues to make offensive comments about race and disabilities I will continue to be "upset" and am saddened and concerned that so many seem to condone this mentality/

What comments about Race??

[fifitrixibelle]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

A direct aim? Hardly, it was a passing comment as you will see if you had watched the whole programme. No intent to harm, just KP being her usual katie-centric self.

Why anyone would bother to get upset by what she says, I don't know, especially when she does so much for Harvey which must count for far more than one sentence from her insensitive gob.

What exactly does she do for Harvey other than throw money at people to do the hard work??

Once you decide to become a parent you owe it to that child to protect it from the moment of conception and to take care of that child thereafter, it's quite something to suggest that some sort of praise should be given for doing what she should( as any parent should) be doing (even though she doesn't ctually do it )

[janetcomelately]

Originally Posted by Amber43

She's in the public eye, she should be aware that a passing comment per se can be offensive see the quotes above in the thread different people in different parts of the country find some terms offensive... she may do much for Harvey but IMO she's scuppering any good with her complete insensitivity and obliviousness to others, so much for raising awareness basically IMO she taints everything and that can't be a good thing

Well yes she should be.aware but she is not exactly known for her level of self awareness and so I don't understand why people take umbrage and give her views far more time than they deserve.

[Amber43]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

Well yes she should be.aware but she is not exactly known for her level of self awareness and so I don't understand why people take umbrage and give her views far more time than they deserve.

Great excuse she's in the public eye, we should disregard her views, yes I'm all for that as they are complete tosh and nonsense, happy to agree with that

[lexi22]

Originally Posted by janetcomelately

Well yes she should be.aware but she is not exactly known for her level of self awareness and so I don't understand why people take umbrage and give her views far more time than they deserve.

Yes, this.

While I think what she said was horrible and horribly thoughtless, I can't for the life of me understand why it's been treated on here as if she's someone of significance whose words have a wider impact.