Forums
 

Complaining to channel 5 and ofcom will backfire on us.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26-06-2012, 09:13   #1
Timalloy84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 598
Complaining to channel 5 and ofcom will backfire on us.

If the connor/Deana thing becomes a massive thing, with complaints about whether it should have been shown/whether he should have been evicted, they just won't show these things happening. We won't get to see how horrible some of them are and just be bombarded with the boring couples constantly.
Timalloy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 26-06-2012, 09:17   #2
Pedro
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London (Pinner)
Posts: 6,726
Then people will stop watching.
Pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 09:39   #3
dontbenaive
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timalloy84 View Post
If the connor/Deana thing becomes a massive thing, with complaints about whether it should have been shown/whether he should have been evicted, they just won't show these things happening. We won't get to see how horrible some of them are and just be bombarded with the boring couples constantly.
Yeah I rather have the Producers show us and let us judge for ourselves rather than scaring them into hiding everything.

Don't people remember that all this over-reaction and complaining is what hurt the show in the first place? This is how we lost the live feeds.

Even after Big Brother got very strict with bullying, the fans turned around and complained how Big Brother would quickly intervene and end arguments, especially during Big Brother 10. If you want drama, people are not always going to be politically correct.
dontbenaive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 09:57   #4
Timalloy84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 598
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontbenaive View Post
Yeah I rather have the Producers show us and let us judge for ourselves rather than scaring them into hiding everything.

Don't people remember that all this over-reaction and complaining is what hurt the show in the first place? This is how we lost the live feeds.

Even after Big Brother got very strict with bullying, the fans turned around and complained how Big Brother would quickly intervene and end arguments, especially during Big Brother 10. If you want drama, people are not always going to be politically correct.
I agree completely. Last nights episode made my blood boil, but that's what good television should do.
Timalloy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:47   #5
td1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,737
Agreed, the moral outrage on here is way OTT. It was an inappropiate set of comments, but the warning was sufficient. I know he'll go now, though-the PC brigade always win in the end these days, sadly.
td1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:48   #6
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timalloy84 View Post
If the connor/Deana thing becomes a massive thing, with complaints about whether it should have been shown/whether he should have been evicted, they just won't show these things happening. We won't get to see how horrible some of them are and just be bombarded with the boring couples constantly.

And then no-one will watch and Big Brother will die. And frankly with the last few days in the house it would be a blessing.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:50   #7
NorthernPenguin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 318
I agree however that sort of treatment is unacceptable.
NorthernPenguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:51   #8
spkx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBFreak View Post
And then no-one will watch and Big Brother will die. And frankly with the last few days in the house it would be a blessing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro View Post
Then people will stop watching.


Why would they stop watching because something that they didn't know has happened wasn't aired?
spkx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:51   #9
Hermione22
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by td1983 View Post
Agreed, the moral outrage on here is way OTT. It was an inappropiate set of comments, but the warning was sufficient. I know he'll go now, though-the PC brigade always win in the end these days, sadly.
The warning wasn't sufficient.
Hermione22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:51   #10
Littlegreen42
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Under The Ivy
Services: GA - R.I.P. / Dean Winchester / Peanut Butter.....
Posts: 4,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by td1983 View Post
Agreed, the moral outrage on here is way OTT. It was an inappropiate set of comments, but the warning was sufficient. I know he'll go now, though-the PC brigade always win in the end these days, sadly.
Burying your head in the sand is just as bad...

Sufficient punishment should have been removal as he has been behaving in this way alot but it has not been shown.
Littlegreen42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:51   #11
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by spkx View Post


Why would they stop watching because something that they didn't know has happened wasn't aired?
Because nothing would happen at all.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:53   #12
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBFreak View Post
And then no-one will watch and Big Brother will die. And frankly with the last few days in the house it would be a blessing.
If they are going to allow that sort of thing to happen them maybe it is time for BB to die
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:55   #13
td1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermione22 View Post
The warning wasn't sufficient.
Perhaps they could've warned him about ejection from the house if it happened again, but I disagree, it was sufficient. What a pack of blood-thirsty people you all are on here-a bit like most of the housemates at the moment.
td1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:56   #14
moominreggie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 305
What a strange viewpoint!

You would sooner see unacceptable behaviour incase they spoil your fun and dont show it.

Then you must like and condone this behaviour.
moominreggie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:57   #15
premixxed
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Eh!
Services: I use the internet :) Love it.
Posts: 3,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by td1983 View Post
Agreed, the moral outrage on here is way OTT. It was an inappropiate set of comments, but the warning was sufficient. I know he'll go now, though-the PC brigade always win in the end these days, sadly.
I'm sorry but his little rap goes far beyond the 'pc brigade' kicking up a storm in a teacup.
His words were absolutely disgraceful and should not be taken lightly.
premixxed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:57   #16
brb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hertfordshire
Services: Sky+HD, Sky Fibre Optic, Netflix, WoW, GW2
Posts: 1,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontbenaive View Post
Yeah I rather have the Producers show us and let us judge for ourselves rather than scaring them into hiding everything.

.
There is a difference though. He threatened Deana. He is a physical threat in the house. *IF* this happened out of the house, he would have been arrested. Something needs to be done about it.
brb is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:58   #17
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by td1983 View Post
Perhaps they could've warned him about ejection from the house if it happened again, but I disagree, it was sufficient. What a pack of blood-thirsty people you all are on here-a bit like most of the housemates at the moment.
It was a slap on the wrist for a serious threat. NOT sufficient.
Of course I'm not demanding a lynching either. But the warning clearly had little effect on Conor. AND people have been thrown out of BB for less. Shoving him out the backdoor is the ideal decision. That way it's more then a slap (He loses the chance to win the money) but also means he gets no more attention and avoids the public via the front door.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 10:59   #18
MsBehaviour
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 3,833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermione22 View Post
The warning wasn't sufficient.
Absolutely. He should have been out of the house through the other diary room door. Perhaps then the unacceptability of his aggressive tirade would be made clear to others in the house - and in the outside world. It was NOT a trivial matter to be dealt with by a trivial 'slap on the wrist.'
MsBehaviour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:01   #19
od hominem
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro View Post
Then people will stop watching.

Exactly.

If enough people complain, they'll listen. They're not in the business of losing viewers. Although you'd never guess, BB is extremely important to C5, and it's the be all and end all to Endemol. This is why they've banned noms talk. It was obvious that they wanted a show on the lines of BB USA, but the majority of UK viewers wouldn't countenance it.
If, after recieving substantial complaints, Endemol play stubborn and don't listen, the chances are that C5 and/or the sponsors will force them to. Don't under-estimate people power.
od hominem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:01   #20
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,595
The fact Coner wasn't even sorry and in fact seemed more annoyed that BB had dared to call him in over it says it all.

TBH if anything at all when they read it out to him you could see all he was thinking was "If they air that I'm screwed" and even then I bet he thinks it's Deana's fault for making him say it
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:01   #21
LeifOnMars
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timalloy84 View Post
. We won't get to see how horrible some of them are and just be bombarded with the boring couples constantly.
A selfish sentiment, also disturbing in that it pleads for the right to see horrible people do horrible things to the marginally less horrible, but more vulnerable, housemates

It is more important to see justice being done and to have the conduct of brainless bulks of brawn a la the common male slapper, Conor, and his barely human acolytes censured.
These are sick, dysfunctional people taking part in an increasingly distasteful, unwatchable show financed by the pornographers that publish the Daily Star, the printed toilet sheets with newspaper pretensions.
LeifOnMars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:02   #22
gcmac
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,120
I don't think people should be complaining about what Conor was shown to have said, but instead about the lack of punishment from Big Brother. I don't mind being shown things like last night, although it's not nice to watch it shows us more about the personalities of the housemates, which is what we are judging them on. I do think he should have been punished more severely, or at least given an official warning. I think if he does it again he should be removed from the house, and hopefully now there have been many people complaining Channel 5 will not hesitate to remove him if his behaviour is repeated.
gcmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:03   #23
LeifOnMars
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro View Post
Then people will stop watching.
So they should.
Watiching grass grow is more edifying than the antics of the halfwits in the BB house.
LeifOnMars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:14   #24
Star_Bright
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,010
Complaints to Ofcom is what messed the show up in the first place.
Star_Bright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:18   #25
MistyBlueEyes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 572
Then BB should act on things like this straight away and nip it in the bud with a suitable punishment ....instead of giving a warning ... then we wouldnt have to complain because justice would of been done ....
MistyBlueEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26.