Forums
 

Saw the Conor thing



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26-06-2012, 11:06   #1
Gunner95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,115
Saw the Conor thing

Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
Gunner95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 26-06-2012, 11:07   #2
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.

Humourous? Are you the one joking here?!
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:08   #3
kattymieoww
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,913
Good lord!
kattymieoww is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:09   #4
brb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hertfordshire
Services: Sky+HD, Sky Fibre Optic, Netflix, WoW, GW2
Posts: 836
We obviously weren't watching the same thing. He was extremely aggressive.
brb is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:09   #5
The Little One
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 472
Nobody says something that extreme as a joke against someone they hate and have made it clear they hate them.
The Little One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:09   #6
MistyBlueEyes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 570
Are you for real
MistyBlueEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #7
21stCenturyBoy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London
Posts: 26,031
Gunner, with respect, I think your age may be playing a part in you coming to this conclusion.

What he said was an ugly reference to sexual and domestic violence.
21stCenturyBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #8
Barrie Williams
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
'100% humourous'? did someone remove your brain?
Barrie Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #9
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by brb View Post
We obviously weren't watching the same thing. He was extremely aggressive.
Don't forget Conor admitted he was angry as well
.
This OP has baffled me extremely. Weirdest most wrong thing I've read on here so far.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #10
NaughtyNan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
I don't see many people laughing but then again there is always one...
NaughtyNan is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #11
The Little One
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 472
You can't say it was a joke anyway- he said to Big Brother he said it because he was angry- when you're angry you're not joking.
The Little One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #12
Summer Kisses
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,335
Strange then that he himself said he was angry!
Summer Kisses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:10   #13
Salv*
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 22,301
He even admitted it was anger, so no, he didn't mean it as humorous.
Salv* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:11   #14
Ms Ann Thrope
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
You are 100% in denial. He himself admitted that it was said in anger. Since when have

ANGER

and

HUMOUR equated to the same thing?

Answer (seeing as you need it spelled out): NEVER

The warning was not enough, he should have been punished as well, preferably by summary eviction.
Ms Ann Thrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:11   #15
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
So, 99% of us are wrong then? That is ridiculous - Conor himself said he was angry
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:11   #16
premixxed
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Eh!
Services: I use the internet :) Love it.
Posts: 3,127
Oh dear.

I suppose these threads are separating the wheat from the chaff.
premixxed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:12   #17
od hominem
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.

The idea that he thought it was funny makes it okay???. What the hell are you smoking??? The warning is'n't sufficient.
od hominem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:13   #18
Gunner95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,115
Just the way it came across to me with the rapping into the hairbrush, seemed as though he was just trying to entertain the house.
Gunner95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:13   #19
Anthony_Burns
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 441
The first obscene rapper-esque part was certainly intended as humorous, though that's not what I'd have called it ... The second "punch her in the face" part was another matter.
Anthony_Burns is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:13   #20
big bro geek
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Was 100% meant to be humourous, the warning suffices.
Sorry mate but it was absolutely vile, joke or not.
big bro geek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:13   #21
couchpotato2011
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 528
Gunner stop trolling.
couchpotato2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:14   #22
Valupatitta
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Just the way it came across to me with the rapping into the hairbrush, seemed as though he was just trying to entertain the house.
entertain the house? that is just sick.
Valupatitta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:14   #23
CBFreak
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Just the way it came across to me with the rapping into the hairbrush, seemed as though he was just trying to entertain the house.
Wouldn't call it rapping.
CBFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:15   #24
Gunner95
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony_Burns View Post
The first obscene rapper-esque part was certainly intended as humorous, though that's not what I'd have called it ... The second "punch her in the face" part was another matter.
Fair point.


Look sorry if I've offended anybody I'm just being open about the way it came across to me.
Gunner95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2012, 11:16   #25
stargazer61
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dirty thirty and proud!
Services: R.I.P. Spirit
Posts: 40,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunner95 View Post
Just the way it came across to me with the rapping into the hairbrush, seemed as though he was just trying to entertain the house.
even as a ' joke' it would have been nasty, degrading, and vicious. However, Conor himself admitted it was said in anger. No excuses...he should have been removed immediately
stargazer61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:00.