Originally Posted by sn_22:
“Interesting to see the BBC Two schedules for next week. Obviously BBC One stuff has given pre-watershed a boost - but even then you've got brand new stuff scheduled at 9pm every single night. And not just filler, either - a new seres of Vexed, plus Horizon specials, the Great British Story and new shows like The Dark or The Midwives that you would usually expect the channel to have high hopes for. It's as strong a weekly schedule for them as I can remember seeing all year!”
Yeah, and the other thing is that it's all demonstrably upmarket BBC2 stuff as well, on Saturday we have the Prom and the documentary about Beethoven. It would have been easy for BBC2 at 9pm and on Saturday to be a bit more populist with the likes of Top Gear and Miranda but they haven't done that.
The thing about the idea that the BBC is "increasingly becoming ratings obsessed" is that they've always been interested in ratings and it's easy to find examples of cynical decisions in their history. In the 1970 World Cup they showed all the England matches and all the other big games, usually head to head with ITV, and in the Radio Times the Head of Sport wrote a piece basically saying "We're not alternating with ITV because our coverage is best so we'll show what we want".
In the eighties, the Home Secretary complained they'd moved the news and Panorama to show The Thorn Birds. In the nineties, Little and Large were axed and then repreived as the management demanded they returned because they got high ratings, plus they also commissioned Caught In The Act, an atrocious rip-off of You've Been Framed, purely for the ratings, and there was Eldorado too. And a decade ago there was Fame Academy being revamped as a spoiler.
So to suggest the BBC are "increasingly ratings obsessed" makes no sense, especially as all anyone bases that on is the fact they said a show had high ratings, when it did.