Originally Posted by GeorgeS:
“Not really. The BBC have introduced quite a lot of new co-com's which is after all the majority of the broadcast.
Its the ad breaks. When ITV go head to head with Sky Sports they do well. But despite the tournament games being specifically built around the ad break timings (the long gap between anthems & KO where nothing at all happens, etc), the BBC give the illusion of providing more content by not having to taken ads.”
“Not really. The BBC have introduced quite a lot of new co-com's which is after all the majority of the broadcast.
Its the ad breaks. When ITV go head to head with Sky Sports they do well. But despite the tournament games being specifically built around the ad break timings (the long gap between anthems & KO where nothing at all happens, etc), the BBC give the illusion of providing more content by not having to taken ads.”
I think purely saying its down to ad breaks is burying your head in the sand a bit. Its a brand/repuatation issue mixed with ad breaks. Simulcasts with no ad breaks on ITV have still seen a huge difference between BBC1 and ITV1 figures. You only have to see how ITV1's ratings nosedive on every Tuesday last Saturday and the 9pm show last night. There is very little viewer loyalty for ITV1.




