Forums
 

Why is Brian Dowling on my television?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2012, 18:10   #1
Timalloy84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 552
Why is Brian Dowling on my television?

Brian Dowling was the rightful winner of BB2 he was kind, funny and could get on with everyone. TV producers recognised this and thought he would make a good television presenter. All the shows Brian was given failed, and eventually ended up presenting post midnight drivel, the Mint. After the Mint got cancelled Brian settled back into being a reality tv star again, (come dine with me, hells kitchen) and re-entered the ultimate big brother house, where once again he reminded us what a funny, nice guy he is...how this got him the presenting gig though, I will never know. As a live presenter, he comes across as nervous, humourless and sometimes even nasty. He is losing any fans he had before this.
Timalloy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 01-07-2012, 18:12   #2
B L Zeebub
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,328
Did he see a mouse, maybe?
B L Zeebub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:13   #3
poikly
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 436
He's nowhere near as bad as people make out but I wanted Emma Willis
poikly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:13   #4
InMyArms
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 31,520
He's awful
InMyArms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:14   #5
happybbfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,018
He's not on mine
happybbfan is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:14   #6
weeesel
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,790
Because you are making the mistake of watching this appalling zombiefied apology for a BB series.....
weeesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:14   #7
sharon curtis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timalloy84 View Post
Brian Dowling was the rightful winner of BB2 he was kind, funny and could get on with everyone. TV producers recognised this and thought he would make a good television presenter. All the shows Brian was given failed, and eventually ended up presenting post midnight drivel, the Mint. After the Mint got cancelled Brian settled back into being a reality tv star again, (come dine with me, hells kitchen) and re-entered the ultimate big brother house, where once again he reminded us what a funny, nice guy he is...how this got him the presenting gig though, I will never know. As a live presenter, he comes across as nervous, humourless and sometimes even nasty. He is losing any fans he had before this.
This is wrong. Most of the shows Brian has presented in the past were successful. Even the Mint was actually a successful show for ITV1.
sharon curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:16   #8
rhumble
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 24,516
He really is as bad as ever,,,,,,,i liked watching him first time around on BB2,,,,,but his presenting skills are terrible,,,,too many sickly sexual references. Trouble is TPTB wont change him
rhumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:19   #9
happybbfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,018
Anyone know how long his contract was with C5 to present the show
C5 have extended the BB contract by 2 years but have any of the presenters
signed any new contracts i wonder




By the way i love brian but presenting BB is not for him,he is far too constricted and scripted
happybbfan is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:19   #10
~V~
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Staffs
Services: I like pasta
Posts: 9,755
To be honest, I've never found him all that nice.

Yes, he can be witty in a shocking way but he can also be spiteful and self-indulgent. To me, the Brian we see on a Friday night (on the main show and milking any applause he can get on BBBOTS) is the same nasty bitchy boy we saw on BB2.
~V~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:21   #11
sharon curtis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by happybbfan View Post
Anyone know how long his contract was with C5 to present the show
C5 have extended the BB contract by 2 years but have any of the presenters
signed any new contracts i wonder
It was widely reported that Brian is signed up for the further 2 years.
sharon curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:22   #12
qwes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 589
If a heterosexual male inappropiately touched his guests and offered or requested sexual acts and made overt and uninvited sexual references to interviewees the way this buffoon continuously does they would be sacked immediately. Wouldn't they?
qwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:22   #13
waking_state
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 412
Completely agree, lovely guy but absolutely terrible big brother presenter. Seems like they need to feed him a couple of valium before he goes on stage, hes so awkward to watch!
waking_state is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:25   #14
happybbfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon curtis View Post
It was widely reported that Brian is signed up for the further 2 years.
if thats the case i wonder why on the survey on the BB site
there were questions regarding how brian is as presenter of BB
Maybe they are going to have some shake up next time
happybbfan is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:26   #15
Inconjunct
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by qwes View Post
If a heterosexual male inappropiately touched his guests and offered or requested sexual acts and made overt and uninvited sexual references to interviewees the way this buffoon continuously does they would be sacked immediately. Wouldn't they?
Because that would be different. Brian is in a long tradition of camp gay men on telly making arch comments and double entendres. A straight man doing this to a woman would more than likely come across as a bit rapey. This is a product of history, culture etc. dry your eyes and get over it.
Inconjunct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:28   #16
sharon curtis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by happybbfan View Post
if thats the case i wonder why on the survey on the BB site
there were questions regarding how brian is as presenter of BB
Maybe they are going to have some shake up next time
It would look odd if there were questions about everything else except the presenters.

The reports said he was signed up as the presenter; he would be bound to notice if the contract just said a job on BB.
sharon curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:29   #17
Timalloy84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon curtis View Post
This is wrong. Most of the shows Brian has presented in the past were successful. Even the Mint was actually a successful show for ITV1.
Not really, he helped drive SMTV into the ground, and the rest have been complete, nothing shows. The mint was one of the most criticised shows in history, that preyed on the vulnerable people in society.
Timalloy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:30   #18
qwes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inconjunct View Post
Because that would be different. Brian is in a long tradition of camp gay men on telly making arch comments and double entendres. A straight man doing this to a woman would more than likely come across as a bit rapey. This is a product of history, culture etc. dry your eyes and get over it.
Nothing wrong with double entendres etc but he actually does sound very rapey with his pathetic pleas for sex from his male interviewees, either HMs or their friends and family. I'm over it already. I just don't like sad and desperate presenters using their job to find sexual partners.
qwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:33   #19
happybbfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon curtis View Post
It would look odd if there were questions about everything else except the presenters.

The reports said he was signed up as the presenter; he would be bound to notice if the contract just said a job on BB.
I must have missed seeing this info about him signing another 2 years as presenter
Anyone got a link to this
happybbfan is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:34   #20
sharon curtis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timalloy84 View Post
Not really, he helped drive SMTV into the ground, and the rest have been complete, nothing shows. The mint was one of the most criticised shows in history, that preyed on the vulnerable people in society.
He did not help drive SMTV into the ground. After the first year of he and Tess Daly presenting it (and please don't forget her!) the show won two BAFTAs!

Nonethless the Mint was a successful show for ITV1.

Just one of the shows Brian narrated - The Salon on C4, attracted ratings of 2.5 million during it's 6 month run. A nothing show? I think not. Posters on DS still mention it sometimes.
sharon curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:35   #21
Timalloy84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 552
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inconjunct View Post
Because that would be different. Brian is in a long tradition of camp gay men on telly making arch comments and double entendres. A straight man doing this to a woman would more than likely come across as a bit rapey. This is a product of history, culture etc. dry your eyes and get over it.
There's a history and culture that homosexual men can make crass comments whenever they like? Personally, I don't like it if males make comments like he does to me.
Timalloy84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:37   #22
Evilredzebra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by happybbfan View Post
if thats the case i wonder why on the survey on the BB site
there were questions regarding how brian is as presenter of BB
Maybe they are going to have some shake up next time
There were questions but the multiple choice answers that we had to select were all positive apart from "out of touch" which isn't the first thing I think of when I watch Brian present (that would be useless, out of his depth, wooden, incapable of reading autocue etc.) but the only thing I could select.
Evilredzebra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:39   #23
BDGA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 630
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharon curtis View Post
It would look odd if there were questions about everything else except the presenters.

The reports said he was signed up as the presenter; he would be bound to notice if the contract just said a job on BB.
He also tweeted yesterday he was clothes shopping for CBB on Monday.
BDGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:39   #24
sharon curtis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,714
Quote:
Originally Posted by happybbfan View Post
I must have missed seeing this info about him signing another 2 years as presenter
Anyone got a link to this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-rad...stay-channel-5
sharon curtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012, 18:40   #25
qwes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 589
Camp gay men have a long tradition of making double entendres etc. But I don't ever remember the likes of John Inman blatantly begging for sex acts and encouraging their guests to phone them.
qwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:38.