should free view viewers pay to watch tv

zoepaulpenny · 02-07-2012, 21:37

I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view, do you think this will happen??? and should it??? i say no!!!

barky99 · 02-07-2012, 21:50

is this instead of licence fee?

zoepaulpenny · 02-07-2012, 21:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by barky99

is this instead of licence fee?

hell no.. as well as...

chrisjr · 02-07-2012, 21:54

I suspect you may have misheard what was said. I would be extremely surprised if the BBC had any pay per view plans as that would more than likely require a re-write of their charter!

Are you sure it wasn't a discussion on whether or not Freeview viewers should have to pay for filters if they get interference from the proposed new 4G mobile services?

iangrad · 02-07-2012, 22:37

The idea of "freeview" is that its FREE to view the clue might be in the name !!!

If any government was to even suggest they would allow any broadcaster to charge , they would be voted out of power before you could even spell coalition !

mac2708 · 02-07-2012, 22:41

Where/when did you hear this? A Google finds nothing except this oldish news
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...catalogue.html

jenzie · 03-07-2012, 01:47

SECOND time they've mentioned this ..... so don't put much credence in it myself!

Daveoc64 · 03-07-2012, 02:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view,

No

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

do you think this will happen???

No

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

and should it???

No

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

i say no!!!

Also no!

call100 · 03-07-2012, 09:36

As someone else posted.....It was a discussion about who should pay for the filters required by Freeview viewers when 4G comes in..........Sheesh! As if it's not bad enough in the Country already, someone is thinking to pay for free TV.....

XxBlaKOuTZxX · 03-07-2012, 09:59

Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already

zoepaulpenny · 03-07-2012, 13:26

ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.

Nigel Goodwin · 03-07-2012, 14:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???

It remains to be seen yet what effect (if any) 4G will have on TV reception - and if it does presumably 4G will be responsible for fitting filters etc.

mac2708 · 03-07-2012, 14:05

Deleted duplicated post

chrisjr · 03-07-2012, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.

No body can say with 100% certainty what effect it will have.

Since the new 4G service will be using the part of the band that used to be used for TV services on UHF channels above 60 there is potential for these signals to be picked up by a TV aerial.

How much signal is picked up will depend to some extent on the type of aerial and the location of the 4G mast(s) relative to the aerial.

The likelihood is that most people won't be seriously affected but there have been figures of as many as 2 million households that could be affected, which, if true, is not exactly a tiny minority however.

mac2708 · 03-07-2012, 14:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps..

will all free view be affected by the new 4g services???
i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.

It was fairly old news anyway.
This is from 23/05/2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18174052

See also http://www.itpro.co.uk/641491/freevi...erference-bill

and
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fr...w=1024&bih=643

zoepaulpenny · 03-07-2012, 21:31

well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen??

Nigel Goodwin · 04-07-2012, 09:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny

well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen??

No one knows, or even if there will be any problems - the bandwidth hasn't even been sold yet (although Blair long since spent the money).

Gary Brenton · 06-07-2012, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisjr

No body can say with 100% certainty what effect it will have.

Since the new 4G service will be using the part of the band that used to be used for TV services on UHF channels above 60 there is potential for these signals to be picked up by a TV aerial.

How much signal is picked up will depend to some extent on the type of aerial and the location of the 4G mast(s) relative to the aerial.

The likelihood is that most people won't be seriously affected but there have been figures of as many as 2 million households that could be affected, which, if true, is not exactly a tiny minority however.

I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok

grahamlthompson · 06-07-2012, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Brenton

I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok

http://www.paras.org.uk/

Some cowboys have made a fortune out this con.

chrisjr · 06-07-2012, 21:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Brenton

I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok

You been poking about on my roof again??

Tassium · 06-07-2012, 21:20

I'm sure the BBC don't want viewers to have to pay for the "filters", that's their whole point.

Winston_1 · 07-07-2012, 00:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Brenton

I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...

I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases.

Gary Brenton · 07-07-2012, 00:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by XxBlaKOuTZxX

Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already

I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching.

IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE'

Peter the Great · 07-07-2012, 09:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Brenton

I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching.

IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE'

Still wearing the rose tinted spectacles I see.

Nigel Goodwin · 07-07-2012, 10:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winston_1

I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases.

Exactly, it was the usual media inaccuracies that promoted the myth that new aerials were required.

02-07-2012, 21:37	#1
zoepaulpenny Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: the land of the hobbit. Posts: 8,839	should free view viewers pay to watch tv I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view, do you think this will happen??? and should it??? i say no!!!

02-07-2012, 21:50	#2
barky99 Forum Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Scotland - near a whirly thing Posts: 3,634	is this instead of licence fee?

02-07-2012, 21:53	#3
zoepaulpenny Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: the land of the hobbit. Posts: 8,839	Quote: Originally Posted by barky99 is this instead of licence fee? hell no.. as well as...

02-07-2012, 21:54	#4
chrisjr Forum Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Reading Posts: 27,916	I suspect you may have misheard what was said. I would be extremely surprised if the BBC had any pay per view plans as that would more than likely require a re-write of their charter! Are you sure it wasn't a discussion on whether or not Freeview viewers should have to pay for filters if they get interference from the proposed new 4G mobile services?

02-07-2012, 22:37	#5
iangrad Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 772	The idea of "freeview" is that its FREE to view the clue might be in the name !!! If any government was to even suggest they would allow any broadcaster to charge , they would be voted out of power before you could even spell coalition !

02-07-2012, 22:41	#6
mac2708 Forum Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3,196	Where/when did you hear this? A Google finds nothing except this oldish news http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...catalogue.html

03-07-2012, 01:47	#7
jenzie Inactive Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: BUDDIETOWN Posts: 20,385	SECOND time they've mentioned this ..... so don't put much credence in it myself!

03-07-2012, 02:07	#8
Daveoc64 Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Bristol (BBC1 West) Posts: 15,143	Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny I heard on the news, that bbc want to charge viewers to watch free view, No Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny do you think this will happen??? No Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny and should it??? No Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny i say no!!! Also no!

03-07-2012, 09:36	#9
call100 Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 6,572	As someone else posted.....It was a discussion about who should pay for the filters required by Freeview viewers when 4G comes in..........Sheesh! As if it's not bad enough in the Country already, someone is thinking to pay for free TV.....

03-07-2012, 09:59	#10
XxBlaKOuTZxX Forum Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Edinburgh / Scotland Posts: 2,773	Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already

03-07-2012, 13:26	#11
zoepaulpenny Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: the land of the hobbit. Posts: 8,839	ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps.. will all free view be affected by the new 4g services??? i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago.

03-07-2012, 14:02	#12
Nigel Goodwin Forum Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Derbyshire Posts: 41,789	Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny will all free view be affected by the new 4g services??? It remains to be seen yet what effect (if any) 4G will have on TV reception - and if it does presumably 4G will be responsible for fitting filters etc.

03-07-2012, 14:05	#13
mac2708 Forum Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3,196	Deleted duplicated post

03-07-2012, 14:06	#15
mac2708 Forum Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3,196	Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny ok i must of mis-heard the news being read.. oooppps.. will all free view be affected by the new 4g services??? i can remember when i had to buy a filter for people using C B RADIO years ago. It was fairly old news anyway. This is from 23/05/2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18174052 See also http://www.itpro.co.uk/641491/freevi...erference-bill and https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=fr...w=1024&bih=643

03-07-2012, 21:31	#16
zoepaulpenny Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: the land of the hobbit. Posts: 8,839	well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen??

04-07-2012, 09:20	#17
Nigel Goodwin Forum Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Derbyshire Posts: 41,789	Quote: Originally Posted by zoepaulpenny well thanks for the clarification guys! when will this happen?? No one knows, or even if there will be any problems - the bandwidth hasn't even been sold yet (although Blair long since spent the money).

06-07-2012, 19:37	#18
Gary Brenton Inactive Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Walsall (West Midlands) Posts: 637	Quote: Originally Posted by chrisjr No body can say with 100% certainty what effect it will have. Since the new 4G service will be using the part of the band that used to be used for TV services on UHF channels above 60 there is potential for these signals to be picked up by a TV aerial. How much signal is picked up will depend to some extent on the type of aerial and the location of the 4G mast(s) relative to the aerial. The likelihood is that most people won't be seriously affected but there have been figures of as many as 2 million households that could be affected, which, if true, is not exactly a tiny minority however. I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok

06-07-2012, 19:59	#19
grahamlthompson Forum Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: Redditch Worcs Posts: 17,293	Quote: Originally Posted by Gary Brenton I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok http://www.paras.org.uk/ Some cowboys have made a fortune out this con.

06-07-2012, 21:04	#20
chrisjr Forum Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Reading Posts: 27,916	Quote: Originally Posted by Gary Brenton I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial...yet i know people who have a rusty aerial that has been up 20 years or so that does the job ok You been poking about on my roof again??

06-07-2012, 21:20	#21
Tassium Forum Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: It's Grim Posts: 24,412	I'm sure the BBC don't want viewers to have to pay for the "filters", that's their whole point.

07-07-2012, 00:09	#22
Winston_1 Forum Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 5,008	Quote: Originally Posted by Gary Brenton I remember all the issues when freeview came into force that everyone needed a new aerial... I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases.

DS Forums

should free view viewers pay to watch tv

07-07-2012, 00:32	#23
Gary Brenton Inactive Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Walsall (West Midlands) Posts: 637	Quote: Originally Posted by XxBlaKOuTZxX Don't you think we pay enough for the crap they show already I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching. IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE'

07-07-2012, 09:59	#24
Peter the Great Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 9,078	Quote: Originally Posted by Gary Brenton I agree....20 odd years ago we had 4 channels with more variety and was spolied for choice of a saturday night....plus the licence fee was much cheaper... NOW we have 70 odd channels with little or nothing worth watching. IMO: Free-View is exactly what is says on the tin... 'FREE' Still wearing the rose tinted spectacles I see.

07-07-2012, 10:10	#25
Nigel Goodwin Forum Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Derbyshire Posts: 41,789	Quote: Originally Posted by Winston_1 I don't remember that. It was always stated that existing aerials would be OK in the majority of cases. Exactly, it was the usual media inaccuracies that promoted the myth that new aerials were required.