[momma11]

Originally Posted by milly

Whats this i hear about her suing pete for naming her rapist,i thought she named him herself on the graham norton show...

How on earth can she sue PA from naming the rapist ? unless , of course , he names the wrong person , and surely then it would be up to the person themselves to sue ?
As far as I remember she didn't name anyone , just declared she had been raped by a celebrity and that PA knew who it was ,which he denied

[momma11]

Originally Posted by Betty Britain

From today I am withdrawing from any topics until their court case is settled .. Selling stories is their bread n butter I know.. But to use your child's injury to point score is disgraceful.

Is this what's happening in the court case ?

[milly]

Originally Posted by momma11

How on earth can she sue PA from naming the rapist ? unless , of course , he names the wrong person , and surely then it would be up to the person themselves to sue ?
As far as I remember she didn't name anyone , just declared she had been raped by a celebrity and that PA knew who it was ,which he denied

Here is the link.....http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebri...ordeal-mystery

[momma11]

On another note ....This from the woman who announced to the public whilst appearing on " This Morning " she wasn't pregnant to AR because she was on her period .

You couldn't make it up , unless of course you are Katie Price !

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...aFJ49Ok1YmOfDQ

[momma11]

Originally Posted by milly

Here is the link.....http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebri...ordeal-mystery

Thanks milly , sounds about right for KP , make an accusation then fails to back it up , never mind that it might cause more than a few problems for the people in her life at the time.
She's an utter , complete waste of time , anything to extend her time in the spotlight , no matter how spurious .

[milly]

Trouble is with her,she thinks she can say what she wants and when she wants,no matter how much it hurts the other person,yet when they say anything about her,she threatens to sue,what a wuss...

[milly]

Originally Posted by momma11

How on earth can she sue PA from naming the rapist ? unless , of course , he names the wrong person , and surely then it would be up to the person themselves to sue ?
As far as I remember she didn't name anyone , just declared she had been raped by a celebrity and that PA knew who it was ,which he denied

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...on-camera.html

[johartuk]

Originally Posted by daisiesfan

I don't think she is unpleasant to others. She just says what she thinks. That's just being honest.

That's the excuse she and her defenders trot out for her rude/bitchy/unpleasant comments about others.

"I'm just being honest!"

And sadly, some people buy into it, rather than seeing it for what it is.

[johartuk]

Originally Posted by milly

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...on-camera.html

Hopefully that footage still exisits and those who filmed it (and/or were present during the filming) can be brought in to testify.

Honestly, the woman is such a cretin!

[daisiesfan]

Originally Posted by johartuk

That's the excuse she and her defenders trot out for her rude/bitchy/unpleasant comments about others.

"I'm just being honest!"

And sadly, some people buy into it, rather than seeing it for what it is.

I'm not defending her at all. I would just like to point out, I am not a fan of hers in the sense that I buy her books, clothes, etc. But I do enjoy watching her reality show.
Sometimes I do hear /read quotes and think she's a bit close to the knuckle. But I actually like that about her too.
Just because you dislike her don't get your back up because I say that I do. There are far worse famous people out there than Katie who in my opinion is harmless and very entertaining.

[milly]

Originally Posted by johartuk

Hopefully that footage still exisits and those who filmed it (and/or were present during the filming) can be brought in to testify.

Honestly, the woman is such a cretin!

Well,you know katie,why would she take the blame for anything she does, when she can blame someone else and drop them in the sh!t,she'll always take the credit,but never the blame.

[Kay2000]

Originally Posted by Betty Britain

She should of done a pre nup with Peter and Alex .. Both came into their marriages with next to nothing..

Pete did sign a pre nup, on his request, it was in either Pete or Katie's book

[Kay2000]

Originally Posted by Betty Britain

The "stateside" series was obviously edited in Peters favour as he was/is still on CANs books. I don't for one minute believe she is an angel but when a marriage is breaking down then there is going to be rows. IMO that series never should of been shown

Why would the stateside show be edited in favour of only Pete, when both he and Katie were both on Cans books at that time

[Blondie X]

Originally Posted by daisiesfan

I don't think she is unpleasant to others. She just says what she thinks. That's just being honest.

An, imo, there is a world of difference between being honest and being pig ignorant rude for the sake of spite and she falls into the latter camp.

I'm a very honest person and tend to tell it how I see but but I also have manners and manage to be honest without being offensive and spiteful - not that hard actually

[daisiesfan]

Originally Posted by Blondie X

An, imo, there is a world of difference between being honest and being pig ignorant rude for the sake of spite and she falls into the latter camp.

I'm a very honest person and tend to tell it how I see but but I also have manners and manage to be honest without being offensive and spiteful - not that hard actually

Fact of the matter is, I like Katie Price and enjoy watching her tv show.
That was all I said and then I had all these anti Katie people trying to tell me that my opinion is wrong. FAIL.
I will continue to watch and enjoy reading about her. You will continue to dislike her.
Will I lose sleep over it? Er, no.

[spongebob_222]

Just thought I would inform you all on a bit of information as well.
I don't know whether any of you have read Katie's autobiographies but through out all of them she has never been happy with CAN and the way they do things, but in her last book You Only Live Once, she mentioned that on June 23rd 2009 she was going to be leaving CAN Associates, this had been planned all the way back from January 2009 so CAN and Peter knew that Katie wouldn't be with them anymore. So it is a bit strange how Peter left her just before she was about to leave the management company isn't it?

I would also agree with somebody saying that the Stateside show was edited in Pete's favour as the show was produced by CAN TV which was part of CAN Associates at the time, CAN knew Katie was leaving so there was no point in doing business fairly, they also knew about the marriage troubles as Katie had obviously told them so of course the show was edited to make Katie out to be the bad one as it was a matter of time before her and peter split and they knew she was leaving anyway. So they had to try and make sure Peter came out on top and Katie was made out to be the mad one in the marriage blaming it all on her

[spongebob_222]

Also Claire was panicking about losing Katie as she was her biggest client and was the biggest earner for them, she knew she had time before Katie was due to leave and knew that her and Peter were having marriage trouble. I believe that Claire was determind to make sure that Katie didn't come out on top from the split and Claire wasn't going to let all of her hard work go to waste so I think Claire's plan was when her and Peter split was to make it look like Katie had gone back to the wild party animal Jordan. As Claire had always been credited with turning Jordan (the drunken glamour model) in to Katie Price (the loving mother and clever businesswoman) so by making it look like Katie had gone back to Jordan, it will come across to potential companies that it was all down to Claire and without Claire, Katie was nothing so they shouldn't touch her or do business with her.

Claire was determined to ruin Katie Price as if Katie wasn't with CAN then she was allowed to have a good career is the basic way of putting it. I have said this before and I will say it again, Claire is the one which tried to ruin Katie's career by selling false stories about her, creating a hate campaign against her and trying to ruin business deals, Claire knew exactly what she was doing and there is evidence to prove these claims. Katie knows all of this as she has heard from Nicola Partridge and Neville Hendricks who were both part of CAN what went on during the split and what Claire was doing
to ruin Katie and her career.

I really hope Katie gets the justice she deserves, Katie has worked hard all the way through her career and doesn't deserve for someone to ruin her empire just because she didn't like the way she was being managed!

[johartuk]

Originally Posted by spongebob_222

Just thought I would inform you all on a bit of information as well.
I don't know whether any of you have read Katie's autobiographies but through out all of them she has never been happy with CAN and the way they do things, but in her last book You Only Live Once, she mentioned that on June 23rd 2009 she was going to be leaving CAN Associates, this had been planned all the way back from January 2009 so CAN and Peter knew that Katie wouldn't be with them anymore. So it is a bit strange how Peter left her just before she was about to leave the management company isn't it?

I would also agree with somebody saying that the Stateside show was edited in Pete's favour as the show was produced by CAN TV which was part of CAN Associates at the time, CAN knew Katie was leaving so there was no point in doing business fairly, they also knew about the marriage troubles as Katie had obviously told them so of course the show was edited to make Katie out to be the bad one as it was a matter of time before her and peter split and they knew she was leaving anyway. So they had to try and make sure Peter came out on top and Katie was made out to be the mad one in the marriage blaming it all on her

Yet more excuses. You're doing KP's cause more harm than good by continuing to make excuses for her. It's just getting sillier and sillier. Are we really expected to believe that KP didn't screech, throw tantrums and generally act like a complete a*se? Also, how do you explain similar unpleasant behavior in the documentaries that were made before KP met PA?

No wonder KP behaves the way she does. She can just blame the editing, exes, former manager or pretty much everyone else except herself.

[MelodyMaker]

Originally Posted by johartuk

Yet more excuses. You're doing KP's cause more harm than good by continuing to make excuses for her. It's just getting sillier and sillier. Are we really expected to believe that KP didn't screech, throw tantrums and generally act like a complete a*se? Also, how do you explain similar unpleasant behavior in the documentaries that were made before KP met PA?

No wonder KP behaves the way she does. She can just blame the editing, exes, former manager or pretty much everyone else except herself.

Or after she'd left CAN, who was responsible for badly editing her then??

[Just a little 1]

When writing that is from one persons observations/point of view (Katie's) unfair to judge when the other eople's point of view is not known (Peter's).

Two sides to the Katie and Peter's story and somewhere in the middle the truth maybe found.

[spongebob_222]

Originally Posted by johartuk

Yet more excuses. You're doing KP's cause more harm than good by continuing to make excuses for her. It's just getting sillier and sillier. Are we really expected to believe that KP didn't screech, throw tantrums and generally act like a complete a*se? Also, how do you explain similar unpleasant behavior in the documentaries that were made before KP met PA?

No wonder KP behaves the way she does. She can just blame the editing, exes, former manager or pretty much everyone else except herself.

I am not making excuses for her, I am stating my point, everybody on here constantly slates her and puts her down, I am just giving the story from another view point adding information which others may not have known. Are we expected to believe that PA didn't screech, throw tantrums and generally act like a complete arse? Exactly everybody always says that KP is the vile one just because she is more upfront and open, she says it hows it is, she has never denied it and has said in the past that sometimes she comes across as cruel. The point is though we see KP at her best and her worst, when she is annoyed, upset, going through a rough time and we see her at her best when she is happy and in a good mood. If you watch PA show, we never see him annoyed or anything like that, we just seem as a happy person which is complete bullshit as nobody is like that all of the time.

[sidsgirl]

Originally Posted by spongebob_222

I am not making excuses for her, I am stating my point, everybody on here constantly slates her and puts her down, I am just giving the story from another view point adding information which others may not have known. Are we expected to believe that PA didn't screech, throw tantrums and generally act like a complete arse? Exactly everybody always says that KP is the vile one just because she is more upfront and open, she says it hows it is, she has never denied it and has said in the past that sometimes she comes across as cruel. The point is though we see KP at her best and her worst, when she is annoyed, upset, going through a rough time and we see her at her best when she is happy and in a good mood. If you watch PA show, we never see him annoyed or anything like that, we just seem as a happy person which is complete bullshit as nobody is like that all of the time.

Dont think you can have watched his shows if you believe this.

[sidsgirl]

Originally Posted by spongebob_222

Also Claire was panicking about losing Katie as she was her biggest client and was the biggest earner for them, she knew she had time before Katie was due to leave and knew that her and Peter were having marriage trouble. I believe that Claire was determind to make sure that Katie didn't come out on top from the split and Claire wasn't going to let all of her hard work go to waste so I think Claire's plan was when her and Peter split was to make it look like Katie had gone back to the wild party animal Jordan. As Claire had always been credited with turning Jordan (the drunken glamour model) in to Katie Price (the loving mother and clever businesswoman) so by making it look like Katie had gone back to Jordan, it will come across to potential companies that it was all down to Claire and without Claire, Katie was nothing so they shouldn't touch her or do business with her.

Claire was determined to ruin Katie Price as if Katie wasn't with CAN then she was allowed to have a good career is the basic way of putting it. I have said this before and I will say it again, Claire is the one which tried to ruin Katie's career by selling false stories about her, creating a hate campaign against her and trying to ruin business deals, Claire knew exactly what she was doing and there is evidence to prove these claims. Katie knows all of this as she has heard from Nicola Partridge and Neville Hendricks who were both part of CAN what went on during the split and what Claire was doing
to ruin Katie and her career.

I really hope Katie gets the justice she deserves, Katie has worked hard all the way through her career and doesn't deserve for someone to ruin her empire just because she didn't like the way she was being managed!

If BIB is correct, that makes Nicola and Neville complicit in what went on. It was Nevilles company fgs. IF what you are saying is correct.

[Kay2000]

Originally Posted by spongebob_222

Also Claire was panicking about losing Katie as she was her biggest client and was the biggest earner for them, she knew she had time before Katie was due to leave and knew that her and Peter were having marriage trouble. I believe that Claire was determind to make sure that Katie didn't come out on top from the split and Claire wasn't going to let all of her hard work go to waste so I think Claire's plan was when her and Peter split was to make it look like Katie had gone back to the wild party animal Jordan. As Claire had always been credited with turning Jordan (the drunken glamour model) in to Katie Price (the loving mother and clever businesswoman) so by making it look like Katie had gone back to Jordan, it will come across to potential companies that it was all down to Claire and without Claire, Katie was nothing so they shouldn't touch her or do business with her.

Claire was determined to ruin Katie Price as if Katie wasn't with CAN then she was allowed to have a good career is the basic way of putting it. I have said this before and I will say it again, Claire is the one which tried to ruin Katie's career by selling false stories about her, creating a hate campaign against her and trying to ruin business deals, Claire knew exactly what she was doing and there is evidence to prove these claims. Katie knows all of this as she has heard from Nicola Partridge and Neville Hendricks who were both part of CAN what went on during the split and what Claire was doing
to ruin Katie and her career.

I really hope Katie gets the justice she deserves, Katie has worked hard all the way through her career and doesn't deserve for someone to ruin her empire just because she didn't like the way she was being managed!

That's a very strong claim to make, that Claire sold stories and created a hate campaign against Katie price to ruin her career! And you know this because?
Katie price was happy to make headlines for all the wrong reasons, like it or not, under Can's more controlled regime, Katie price became more popular and people were more happy for her to be seen on tv more, companies were happy to stock her merchandise, with the departure from Can, and i was under the impression that Katie gave Claire a choice after Pete left, of who Claire wished to continue working with, and Claire chose Pete, now i stand to be corrected on that! But when Can no longer represented Katie, she reverted back to her old ways, grabbing any shocking media interest. I would like to know which stories Claire were meant to have sold, to show Katie in a bad light. As for Neville Hendrick's claims, he was the man that was in charge of the editing, for the stateside show, as it was his production team that filmed the show, nothing to do with Claire Powell

[Glenn A]

Why doesn't Katie price ditch her pointless reality shows that hardly anyone watches now and do some good with her £ 35 million? I know she's into showjumping, why not set up a charity for deprived children who want to ride or maybe even try her hand as a showjumper.