|
||||||||
Why Did Michael Jackson Release so much singles ? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 226
|
Why Did Michael Jackson Release so much singles ?
Relaistically, MJ was the greatest male artist of the 20th century (for me anyway). But what really baffles me that he releases so many singles from a inviduial album like for the "Dangerous" album, he released 9 singles and a unoffical single for other reasons.
And it not only him, in the 80's people like Prince, Janet (MJ sister) were releasing almost the indcental amount of singles as well. And even now, i seen Beyonce release singles like theirs no tommorow along with Katy Perry recently as well. Your Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Agoura Hills
Posts: 998
|
Because his label knew they would sell. Quincy Jones said that the key was to keep the singles coming and to have them come in quick succession. Some of these albums were so big back in the day that anything released from them would more or less sell. The first five singles from "Bad" were all number ones and it's obvious his label wanted to keep the momentum going with even more hit singles. It was a huge time for singles back in the 1980s and 1990s. You also had some singles released in certain countries but not in others - Janet Jackson had a few radio only singles in the US that were actually released commercially in other countries. I personally think Katy Perry's label put out "The One That Got Away" purely to try and beat Michael Jackson's record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: derby
Posts: 14,765
|
why shouldnt he have? its a money making business and its perfectly legitimate for him to realease anything thatll sell or promote his music. that of course applies to everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,109
|
Quote:
Relaistically, MJ was the greatest male artist of the 20th century (for me anyway). But what really baffles me that he releases so many singles from a inviduial album like for the "Dangerous" album, he released 9 singles and a unoffical single for other reasons.
And it not only him, in the 80's people like Prince, Janet (MJ sister) were releasing almost the indcental amount of singles as well. And even now, i seen Beyonce release singles like theirs no tommorow along with Katy Perry recently as well. Your Thoughts? 'So much music' or 'so many singles' You're welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,006
|
Quote:
Because his label knew they would sell. Quincy Jones said that the key was to keep the singles coming and to have them come in quick succession. Some of these albums were so big back in the day that anything released from them would more or less sell. The first five singles from "Bad" were all number ones and it's obvious his label wanted to keep the momentum going with even more hit singles. It was a huge time for singles back in the 1980s and 1990s. You also had some singles released in certain countries but not in others - Janet Jackson had a few radio only singles in the US that were actually released commercially in other countries. I personally think Katy Perry's label put out "The One That Got Away" purely to try and beat Michael Jackson's record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,303
|
It's a shame that Sony gave up on MJ during Invincible. They only released 2 proper singles from that - 3 if we include Butterflies. There was at least 5 others tracks that were definitely single worthy imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 4,638
|
Grammar - it are hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Crawley
Posts: 614
|
Quote:
It's a shame that Sony gave up on MJ during Invincible. They only released 2 proper singles from that - 3 if we include Butterflies. There was at least 5 others tracks that were definitely single worthy imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,552
|
The music world was dramatically different before the internet, the only way for an artist to get their music heard was on the radio or Top Of The Pops or to get the single/album reviewed in the press. This meant they had to release more singles to keep up the 'hype' and the public interest.
Whereas now a single can be on radio for ages, fans will make their own remixes and mash-ups and put them on Youtube, old songs can come 'back from the dead' if an XFactor contestant sings it on the show. Everything has changed. also in the case of Michael Jackson his BAD and Dangerous World Tours where incredibly long, with the gigs literally taking place all over the world. Leaving little time for new material to be recorded (Michael also wrote a lot of his own material) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,037
|
Quote:
Grammar - it are hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Barry's Manor
Posts: 25,824
|
To heal the world, and make it a better place
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,122
|
I miss artists releasing lots of singles look at rihanna it gets more people intrested in the album and if you have a good video to go with it why not? mariah said back in the 90's she wanted to put out more singles but wasn't allowed by sony.
Especially with her debut album where prisioner or vanishing could have been hits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,173
|
Quote:
To heal the world, and make it a better place
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,699
|
Because he was the king.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,109
|
Quote:
Grammar - it are hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 8,641
|
Because he was so talented was capable of producing music and subsequently albums that did not have album fillers. It was also a trait of the music industry during that time to produce a vast amount of singles. As previously Madonna, Janet Jackson and Prince did the same. Record labels demanded high quality music which is not so much the case today. In the modern day people gain a high reputation for producing so little with the exception of Eminem). But that is my opinion and that is how it seems to me anyway. The industry just seems so contrived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,547
|
Quote:
Because he was so talented was capable of producing music and subsequently albums that did not have album fillers. It was also a trait of the music industry during that time to produce a vast amount of singles. .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,124
|
When Katy Perry and Beyonce release lots of singles, it's "They're too overexposed. They need to take a break. They're so desperate."
When Michael Jackson, or another 80's legend does it, it's "Why not? They might aswell. It's because they have so many good songs on their albums". |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,740
|
More singles equals more income.
Out of court settlements and buying silence didn't come cheap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 436
|
It's simple pre mp3 cd recorders the only way you could purchase single records was on vinyl and tape format. Although piracy on tape was about, the quality was rubbish as usually from a dodgy radio recording(again poor quality).
Single versions usually were remixed or radio edited from the album often you got a B side that was previously unreleased material or instrumental / alternate version of a song. You could only purchase the song when the record company officially released it as a single. No Internet was available to download or get hold of pictures/ covers so collectors and fans would even buy just for the cover if they thought the song wasn't any good. When the single went out of press usually after it dropped out of the charts you would no longer be able to purchase the song on its own again. So realistically it was obsolete. There was no instant market as the only way to purchase was going into a shop or mail order for specialist versions. Record companies could then release at a controlled rate to ensure longevity in the chart. Frequently especially with really high volume sale singles it could take weeks to eventually get a copy as often they would be sold out. Singles sold for £2-3.50 in the late eighties which is equivalent between £6.50-8 in today's market so it was big money. Artists could make a lot more money from single sales than albums over the period of the album. Hence that artists especially pop artists didnt need to tour to make big money. A single release was just as exciting as a tour as you only had 4 tv stations Top of the Pops was about the only way you would see a music video or artist or pictures in papers and the likes of smash hits magazine. hence when a pop artist flew into the country thousands of fans would wait atan airport to catch a glimpse. As nothing was instant photos, music,videos, nothing was on demand. This then created such a buzz about an artists releases especially singles which at the time could be seen as much more important than album releases. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 226
|
Like someone said before, He was the king!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 8,036
|
Quote:
Relaistically, MJ was the greatest male artist of the 20th century (for me anyway). But what really baffles me that he releases so many singles from a inviduial album like for the "Dangerous" album, he released 9 singles and a unoffical single for other reasons.
And it not only him, in the 80's people like Prince, Janet (MJ sister) were releasing almost the indcental amount of singles as well. And even now, i seen Beyonce release singles like theirs no tommorow along with Katy Perry recently as well. Your Thoughts? singles are a marketing tool for an album. as he didn't record much that was releasable the record company released a load of singles to compensate for albums being about 5 or more years apart janet didn't release quite so many singles apart from the rythmn nation album. her albums were a bit closer together at 3/4 years apart as for katy perry, the record company is just making the most of her current success which isn't likely to be long lived big difference with prince is that whilst he had a load of singles, he had an album out every year, and only had 3 or 4 singles released from each album on average. now he wasn't the greatest MALE artist of the 20th century, but the greatest artist of the 20th century, and still alive and performing, recording and releasing new music each year, which yet another new tour upcoming http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...F&feature=plcp http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SFNW5F8K9Y |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:01.

