Ofcom launching investigation |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#27 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Services: premier broadband
Posts: 14,515
|
Quote:
The clever thing would have been to warn Conor severely and bury the thing on the cutting room floor. They were honest enough to show it, or did not mind hanging Connor out to dry for ratings etc so I cant see anything happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Land of the Dragon
Posts: 5,931
|
When viewers started watching the Program they like myself had no idea what Conor would say about Deana ... he is disgusting IMO and anyone who defends him has no morals at all
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,272
|
Bloody hell and to think it was always the Live Feed watchers that got the blame for OFCOMS investigations .....well,well .......That is all
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13,016
|
Quote:
Honestly, I don't support what Conor did but I find all these BB fans complaining to Ofcom are not only cutting their nose to spite their faces, they're also watching the wrong show if they're looking for decent sorts. The show, for years now, has catered for freaks, outcasts, extremes in society. It therefore seems a bit rich that anyone who, this far down the line, still tunes in every night can get that morally outraged and shocked when an idiot makes some stupid remarks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Services: premier broadband
Posts: 14,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorkshire - God's Own County
Services: Junction 34 on the M1
Posts: 11,096
|
I agree. There's a difference between banter and aggressive ranting and no TV programme should be allowed to get away with it. If Deana feels uncomfortable around him, BB should have sorted it straight away. Previous HMs have been thrown out for less. As for Victor Ebuwa, he is seen as a BB hero for some reason but some people remember him as being a nasty piece of work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Land of the Dragon
Posts: 5,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,790
|
I think it was probably the case that a lot of people were thoroughly enjoying the show until some ranting loon launched forth a diatribe involving shoving haircare products into women's orifices. Or should they have predicted that was going to happen in advance using the human race's well-known precognative abilities and not watched the show?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,753
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,015
|
Quote:
Conor's rant didn't happen on live feed the producers chose to show it because his behaviour would have come to light as housemates are evicted it was a very poor way to increase ratings too |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18,466
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,343
|
Correct, I will wait until they put on the web-site the actual official warning and not the ticking off.... then and only then will I believe they take duty of care seriously...if they have the video and are holding it back because they like the controversy then what a sick way to earn a living.... scummy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,328
|
I have no problem with Conor's rant being shown.
I have a problem with him not being removed for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13,241
|
I don't want BB next year and the year after to up the ante again and allow someone to be terrorised in the house and justify it by saying they aren't complaining. I like a bit of drama. I don't mind argukments and grudges but there is a limit and Connor is well past it. He shouldn't be on TV after what he said. What he said was offensive to many viewers and shouldn't be minimised as then it will just get worse and worse and worse. Next year someone will be arguing if Connor got away with that, why should shouldn't they. It sets a precedent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Services: iPhone 5, Nexus 7, Windows 8
Posts: 12,402
|
It is a reality show. Instances of unpleasantness is going to seep through because it is REAL LIFE. You get unpleasantness in the real world. Now, if those comments were scripted, I can see why people would have a problem with them. Complaining to OFCOM is just silly and complaints will make producers more aware of what to broadcast, meaning things will be presented in a positive way all the time to avoid backlash or complaints even if that is not the case.
Big Brother fans really are their own worse enemies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,786
|
Well there was enough of the great British public voting for conor to stay in the house. That will be enough for bb to say that he should not and will not be ejected. Though I still am intrigued to know who these people are that have voted for him and no doubt will continue to do so
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Twin Peaks
Posts: 35,397
|
I think if his severe warning had actually been broadcast people would have been far less bothered about it. It's the fact that from the viewers perspective all we saw was him getting a mild talking to. It was barely a slap on the wrist. At least we did see Caroline receive a formal warning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,790
|
In tha same way that 'gay' meaning 'bright and cheerful' ame to be an epithet for homosexual and 'n*****' (a simple derivation from the race category 'negro') became an epithet for black-skinned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,115
|
Quote:
Thank you for your email regarding the episode of Big Brother transmitted on 25th June. Channel 5 and the producers of the programme, Endemol, were aware of and monitored Conor’s reaction to Deana failing the food-based task from the outset. In accordance with standard programme procedures, Conor was immediately called into the diary room and reprimanded for his behaviour and Conor has acknowledged that this was unacceptable. We thought it was important to show that Conor’s behaviour was not condoned by Big Brother or any of the housemates and that this kind of conduct will not be tolerated in the house. Having spoken to Conor, and bearing in mind our duty of care to the other housemates, we are satisfied that he should continue to participate in the programme. We are grateful to you for taking the time to make us aware of your concerns and we have noted the details of your complaint in our Viewer Enquiries Report. This is circulated throughout the company and seen by all relevant personnel here at Channel 5 and at Endemol, who continue to monitor the behaviour of all housemates. Thank you for your interest in Channel 5. Yours sincerely Steven VIEWER ADVISOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,790
|
BB acted poorly by allowing Conor to remain in that confined space with Deana. I still don't believe that she knows what he said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 51,839
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35.




so I cant see anything happening.
Its their way of controlling what happens.
of course there are those who revel in watching things like that