[Hamilton1]

How can people explain away the unbelievable anomalies in this CCTV still image from July 7th 2005?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVDi5Qe11Gc

Yes, the narrator has an unusual voice, get over it.

Please could people explain away the anomalies?

[blueblade]

It's a 10 minute video of stills ~ any clue as to what we might be looking for. In advance, like ?

Cheers

[crunchienut]

Sorry, but all i can hear is, erm, erm, erm, erm, erm...

[Hamilton1]

Originally Posted by crunchienut

Sorry, but all i can hear is, erm, erm, erm, erm, erm...

Get over it! So you can't watch it because of that? Ridiculous.

[Perfection]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

How can people explain away the unbelievable anomalies in this CCTV still image from July 7th 2005?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVDi5Qe11Gc

Yes, the narrator has an unusual voice, get over it.

Please could people explain away the anomalies?

I haven't looked, but what makes you think the images haven't been photo- shopped after 7/7 by these conspiracy nuts? Just asking.

[Hamilton1]

Originally Posted by Perfection

I haven't looked, but what makes you think the images haven't been photo- shopped after 7/7 by these conspiracy nuts?

One thing is the railing goes THROUGH his head.

38 minutes and 40 second into this video explains it in more detail: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PWDQTHECb8

[epicurian]

No, it's not normal for a human being to be missing a triangular chunk from his leg!

I'm convinced (of what, I'm not sure yet), but thanks, OP.

[Avada_Kedavra]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

How can people explain away the unbelievable anomalies in this CCTV still image from July 7th 2005?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVDi5Qe11Gc

Yes, the narrator has an unusual voice, get over it.

Please could people explain away the anomalies?

Hi,

For me this clip seems fine, some of the footage is rather poor as you would expect from CCTV footage. This sometimes leads to 'anomalies', I don't think this is nefarious just poor quality footage, It is like some people who say no planes hit the twin towers because there are certain anomalies in the footage, which supposedly renders the planes as fake or CGI.

[garyessex]

Erm...pixelation in VCR is always like that, no?

[Hamilton1]

Originally Posted by Avada_Kedavra

Hi,

For me this clip seems fine, some of the footage is rather poor as you would expect from CCTV footage. This sometimes leads to 'anomalies', I don't think this is nefarious just poor quality footage, It is like some people who say no planes hit the twin towers because there are certain anomalies in the footage, which supposedly renders the planes as fake or CGI.

This has nothing to do with 9/11. Please discuss 9/11 in a relevasnt thread and not divert this to 9/11.

Keep the thread on topic and not go off on a tangent.

[crunchienut]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

Get over it! So you can't watch it because of that? Ridiculous.

Its not that i can't watch it, its that it is exceedingly tedious trying to watch something with a narrator that takes 5 minutes to finish one sentence because there are so many 'erms'.

[Perfection]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

One thing is the railing goes THROUGH his head.

38 minutes and 40 second into this video explains it in more detail: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PWDQTHECb8

OK I see what your getting at, but CCTV footage is always rubbish. I have CCTV around the grounds of our home. It's HD quality cameras and even then, some footage and paused stills of fast-ish moving images usually come out pretty poor quality, especially when zoomed onto. Some pretty funny, a bit like these.

I do agree there is more to 7/7 than we have been led to believe, but this sort of 'evidence' does no favours to the 'truth'.

[KJ44]

Video compression artifacts.

Perfect digital video requires more bandwidth than is available, even HD on your TV is compressed. Compression throws away information that experiment has shown can be filled in by people's brains. If you freeze frame it, you get all sorts of weird stuff. Perfect fodder for conspiracy theorists.

[jesaya]

So, 'they' have the ability to fake the CCTV but not the wit to make a decent job of it? OR it could just be that you get odd artifacts in poor quality CCTV.

I know which I find most convincing and it isn't the argument of whoever made that you tube video.

[Avada_Kedavra]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

This has nothing to do with 9/11. Please discuss 9/11 in a relevasnt thread and not divert this to 9/11.

Keep the thread on topic and not go off on a tangent.

Sorry, But I was just using an example of other images which have been scrutinized, I feel the triangle that's missing near his jeans and jacket is simply his white underpants, which show between a gap in the jeans and jacket.

[BrooklynBoy]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

This has nothing to do with 9/11. Please discuss 9/11 in a relevasnt thread and not divert this to 9/11.

Keep the thread on topic and not go off on a tangent.

Get over it!

[captainkremmen]

God that guys voice is damn annoying.


The guy is wearing low cut jeans, I would hazard a guess that the so called chunk missing between the jacket and jeans could very well be his boxers. Certainly looks that way to me.

Merging of pixels very, very normal in low resolution images when blown up, anyone who has ever used photoshop and/or blown up low resolution pics knows that.

Typical of conspiracy theorists, you see what you want to see, just like those idiots who say they saw missiles strapped underneath 9/11 planes, torpedo holes in the Titanic etc. etc.

[Gordie1]

Originally Posted by crunchienut

Its not that i can't watch it, its that it is exceedingly tedious trying to watch something with a narrator that takes 5 minutes to finish one sentence because there are so many 'erms'.

its like watching Graham norton.

[Hamilton1]

Originally Posted by Avada_Kedavra

Sorry, But I was just using an example of other images which have been scrutinized, I feel the triangle that's missing near his jeans and jacket is simply his white underpants, which show between a gap in the jeans and jacket.

Please do not apoligise.

Not that of course anyone needs my permission to express an opinion but I welcome all opinions and explanations. Sharing information and explanations is always positive no matter what people think of it.

[Perfection]

What I find impossible to believe is some think they are capable of creating this whole scenario but are so incompetent that they can't satisfactorily fake a few CCTV images.

They are either so good they can string this whole 7/7 together

or

They are so useless, they cant put together a few decent CCTV images.

I suppose you could argue they could be a bit of both, but will need better evidence than this fools video.

[Avada_Kedavra]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

Please do not apoligise.

Not that of course anyone needs my permission to express an opinion but I welcome all opinions and explanations. Sharing information and explanations is always positive no matter what people think of it.

Thanks, My explanation is simple, Occam's razor. How do you feel about my explanation?

[jesaya]

I am not familiar with the 7/7 conspiracy... can someone tell me what this is supposed to mean? Were those not the bombers or something?

[Voynich]

I'm soooo over it.

[LifeOfBryan]

Originally Posted by Hamilton1

Please could people explain away the anomalies?

YOU FIRST!

I mean doesn't your whole tone screem that you think you are superior to everyone and are above even needing to explain as you have already vetted it to be something important already?

What is it that makes you so above us normal people, that we need you to tell us ignorant people just what is what?

[pugamo]

What is wrong with the people who have commented on this video on youtube? They seem to have some anger issues.