|
||||||||
Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 20) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#276 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Rangers want dual contracts investigation dropped.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#277 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,089
|
Quote:
Rangers want dual contracts investigation dropped.
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 6,317
|
I will re-post this here as it is more on topic here, than there.
The SPL wants a share of the money the SFL get for the Rangers TV deal. You really couldn't make it up ![]() It's always been about the money, more to the point, the money Rangers bring with them via sponsorship at TV deals. They spent months trying to find ways to squeeze Rangers into the SPL so they could get the money, when that didnt work they tried for Div 1 knowing they would get the money next year...that didnt work either. Now with Rangers in Div3 they face a prospect of 3 (or more) years with no money they have given up hiding behind any kind of façade and are now just outright saying, we want the money you bring and will use any trick in the book to take it, like it or not. Where is the much talked about "sporting integrity" now? Back in its box under the stairs where it had been for the previous 40 years, seems it only gets brought out for special occasions, and swiftly put away again when its job is done. |
|
|
|
|
#279 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
I'll bet they do.
It's almost as though Mr Green doesn't want membership ... |
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
I will re-post this here as it is more on topic here, than there.
The SPL wants a share of the money the SFL get for the Rangers TV deal. You really couldn't make it up ![]() It's always been about the money, more to the point, the money Rangers bring with them via sponsorship at TV deals. They spent months trying to find ways to squeeze Rangers into the SPL so they could get the money, when that didnt work they tried for Div 1 knowing they would get the money next year...that didnt work either. Now with Rangers in Div3 they face a prospect of 3 (or more) years with no money they have given up hiding behind any kind of façade and are now just outright saying, we want the money you bring and will use any trick in the book to take it, like it or not. Where is the much talked about "sporting integrity" now? Back in its box under the stairs where it had been for the previous 40 years, seems it only gets brought out for special occasions, and swiftly put away again when its job is done. The SPL never mentioned sporting integrity. They were shown sporting integrity by the SPL clubs, by the chairmen of the SFL clubs and by supporters across Scotland. Now, what is your point caller?
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,089
|
Quote:
In a situation that requires humility Sevco just can't help themselves, they have inherited the arrogance of Rangers(IA) that's for sure
It's almost as though Mr Green doesn't want membership ... |
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
You wonder, don't you!!!!
sevco: "If you don't drop the investigation into the dead club's cheating then we will withdraw our application for SFA membership!" SFA:
|
|
|
|
|
#283 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,306
|
Quote:
Is it sevco's ace in the hole?
sevco: "If you don't drop the investigation into the dead club's cheating then we will withdraw our application for SFA membership!" SFA: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#284 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 6,317
|
Quote:
Once again you show yourself up as a quite 'inept' individual by answering your own question.
The SPL never mentioned sporting integrity. They were shown sporting integrity by the SPL clubs, by the chairmen of the SFL clubs and by supporters across Scotland. Now, what is your point caller? ![]() ![]() LINK The SPL clubs were bandying around "sporting integrity" as the primary reason not to allow Rangers to transfer their share over to their new parent company, then when it got to the SFL, "sporting integrity" was used again to banish them to DIV3,( this part i agreed with,as that is where Rangers should have been put) Not to worry though, "sporting integrity" has served it's use, and is now safely back in it's box under the stairs. |
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
That wouldn't surprise me. An avenue opened up for Green to escape with no football while managing to put all the blame on the authorities.
|
|
|
|
|
#286 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
What are you on about?
![]() LINK The SPL clubs were bandying around "sporting integrity" as the primary reason not to allow Rangers to transfer their share over to their new parent company, then when it got to the SFL, "sporting integrity" was used again to banish them to DIV3,( this part i agreed with,as that is where Rangers should have been put) Not to worry though, "sporting integrity" has served it's use, and is now safely back in it's box under the stairs. It is the SPL that is forcing the issue over future TV deals. To their credit, it is the only thing they have never budged on - irrespective of your view of them. It is no one else. So, why are you surprised that the SPL should persue TV money now? What has offended you now that didn't offend you when the SPL were trying to force Rangers into the SPL/ SPL2 or SFL1. Not surprisingly, your logic has by-passed me ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#287 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Rangers have done nothing wrong yet fear the results of an investigation into possible cheating.
|
|
|
|
|
#288 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 6,317
|
Quote:
I have wondered about you for quite some time but every post you make emphasises your 'blind offended persona'.
It is the SPL that is forcing the issue over future TV deals. To their credit, it is the only thing they have never budged on - irrespective of your view of them. It is no one else. So, why are you surprised that the SPL should persue TV money now? What has offended you now that didn't offend you when the SPL were trying to force Rangers into the SPL/ SPL2 or SFL1. Not surprisingly, your logic has by-passed me ![]() the SPL can vote that Rangers cant enter the SPL, what is an issue is that after telling Rangers " we dont want you", they are now adding, "but we want some of the money you will bring" The SPL have no reason that i can see to ask for money from a club that is operating i different league, any money earned should go to the lower divisions, that is where Rangers are, so that is the leagues that should get the money. whats not to understand? |
|
|
|
|
#289 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Apparently SPL broadcasters want one tv deal to cover SPL and SFL games.
|
|
|
|
|
#290 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
Quote:
Morton lost 1-0 in the Renfrewshire cup to the manky mob from pishley. A late goal from former Morton striker Paul McGowan was enough to give them the trophy
![]() now we can relax, as we already have silverware this season ![]() as for this "thesevcorangersxbox360" debacle ..... i can see them not getting registered at all, at his rate!!! |
|
|
|
|
#291 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
oh and the SFL can tell the SPL to sod off too, about the tv deal that isn't signed or anytihng yet .....
|
|
|
|
|
#292 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
|
That caps lock still hasn't been fixed...
|
|
|
|
|
#293 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
Quote:
That caps lock still hasn't been fixed...
![]() and who is green trying to sell the club too now??? wasn't there a 20 person consortium behind him .... and that other guy who who put a million in last week ..... my opinion on this i can't see them getting registered for next week |
|
|
|
|
#294 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Quote:
oh and the SFL can tell the SPL to sod off too, about the tv deal that isn't signed or anytihng yet .....
Of course, the SFL should get their fair share (whatever that may be), but the idea in itself isn't a bad one necessarily. |
|
|
|
|
#295 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
The SPL have, bizarrely, shown integrity. They kept out SevCo and had a democratic vote on who should replace the now bankrupt Rangers.
It's Neil Doncaster as an individual who has shown no integrity. |
|
|
|
|
#296 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 1,787
|
Quote:
oh and the SFL can tell the SPL to sod off too, about the tv deal that isn't signed or anytihng yet .....
Sounds like a good start to me. |
|
|
|
|
#297 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
|
Quote:
The SPL have, bizarrely, shown integrity. They kept out SevCo and had a democratic vote on who should replace the now bankrupt Rangers.
It's Neil Doncaster as an individual who has shown no integrity. |
|
|
|
|
#298 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Quote:
I really don't understand what leaving that man in a job.
I've not checked the rules, but it would probably need umpteen different processes to even propose the removal of the CEO. |
|
|
|
|
#299 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Greenock
Posts: 6,055
|
Quote:
BEST NEWS I'VE HEARD ALL MONTH
![]() now we can relax, as we already have silverware this season ![]() as for this "thesevcorangersxbox360" debacle ..... i can see them not getting registered at all, at his rate!!! ![]() was a good game despite the result, mcgowan is far too good for st m****n and they will be lucky to hold onto him |
|
|
|
|
#300 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51,529
|
Quote:
Apathy, probably.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37.






