DS Forums

 
 

Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 20)


Closed Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-12-2012, 00:35
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
Seems Dundee have admitted to letting fans in when they were far too drunk to go in but they felt they had no choice. We all know the drinking culture in Scotland so why was this not planned for?
What sort of plans can be put in place, do you think?

Given the size of the travelling support, if anyone had been stopped from entering because of intoxication, there would have been a full-scale riot IMO.
Mark. is offline  
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-12-2012, 00:37
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
No, I asked a question.


Ah yes, an innocent question where you didn't attempt to assert blame in any way, shape or form.

I didn't say it was, but short of building a few extra turnstiles at lightning speed, what could have been done by DFC, the police or the stewards?
Why not ask your mate who works the turnstiles why there were only problems in the middle turnstiles?

The reasons for the behaviour at the turnstiles.
I've already said that there were drunk Celtic fans there who shouldn't have been at the game.
timboy is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:40
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361


Ah yes, an innocent question where you didn't attempt to assert blame in any way, shape or form.
If that's how you wish to interpret it, so be it..

Why not ask your mate who works the turnstiles why there were only problems in the middle turnstiles?
The problems were on all turnstiles in the Bob Shankly Stand.

I've already said that there were drunk Celtic fans there who shouldn't have been at the game.
That doesn't mean you can't try and deflect blame when it comes to other aspects of some fans' behaviour.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:45
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
What sort of plans can be put in place, do you think?

Given the size of the travelling support, if anyone had been stopped from entering because of intoxication, there would have been a full-scale riot IMO.
There are always numerous stories after almost every game about fans being stopped by Police on their way to games and booze being confiscated etc.. therefore I'm surprised that the only choice was to allow everyone in last night and then I hear words like Police 'kettling' the fans inside the ground.

One thing is certain, whether it's not 'a minority' or up to 200 people involved depending on which bit of the sun article is read first, it shouldn't happen.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:50
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
There are always numerous stories after almost every game about fans being stopped by Police on their way to games and booze being confiscated etc..
I'd say that's the responsibility of Strathclyde Police (for Glasgow buses, natch); it's not much good doing anything about it at this end.

therefore I'm surprised that the only choice was to allow everyone in last night
Again, if local police don't stop the buses leaving, the fans are drunk when they arrive (then go to a pub in Dundee for a few hours). We're then back to square one.

and then I hear words like Police 'kettling' the fans inside the ground.
Unless there were some in the concourse, there were no police in the Shankly last night. They stayed pitchside.

I think one thing is for certain - if Celtic (or The Rangers) are away on Boxing Day/NYD next season, the KO won't be any later than 3pm.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:52
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
If that's how you wish to interpret it, so be it..
Then so be it.

The problems were on all turnstiles in the Bob Shankly Stand.
When it came to the crushing issue it isn't.

That doesn't mean you can't try and deflect blame when it comes to other aspects of some fans' behaviour.
I've said from the very outset that there were drunken Celtic fans there. The police and stewards never done their jobs properly by not stopping these folk getting to the turnstiles.

It isn't that long since fans were climbing parts of Tannadice to fight with opposition fans. Are the police and stewards in Dundee that inept?

If anything though, I'm more worried at the latest song choice by the Celtic support. Amending a Robbie Williams song and singing it at the football would have got you a well deserved kick in the nuts not so long ago.
timboy is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:58
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
I'd say that's the responsibility of Strathclyde Police (for Glasgow buses, natch); it's not much good doing anything about it at this end.


Again, if local police don't stop the buses leaving, the fans are drunk when they arrive (then go to a pub in Dundee for a few hours). We're then back to square one.


Unless there were some in the concourse, there were no police in the Shankly last night. They stayed pitchside.

I think one thing is for certain - if Celtic (or The Rangers) are away on Boxing Day/NYD next season, the KO won't be any later than 3pm.
I was out for Mad Friday last night, saw a few groups of folk being refused entry into places because they were drunk. Just as well it wasn't Dundee I was in then as I dread to think what chaos would ensue.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 00:58
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
When it came to the crushing issue it isn't.
I wasn't referring only to crushing, but all incidents (spitting, abuse etc.).

The police and stewards never done their jobs properly by not stopping these folk getting to the turnstiles.
You honestly think that would have ended well, when you had entire busloads who had booked pubs in Dundee almost from opening time?

It's for the same reason the police and stewards change their attitude depending on who we're playing --- teams with smaller supports = easy to manage, troublemakers can be dealt with with little hassle. Teams with bigger supports = more difficult, real terms number of troublemakers increases so easier to just try and contain it.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:00
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
I was out for Mad Friday last night, saw a few groups of folk being refused entry into places because they were drunk. Just as well it wasn't Dundee I was in then as I dread to think what chaos would ensue.
There's a bit of a difference between half a dozen or so people being refused entry to a pub/club, and several hundred being refused entry to a football ground.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:02
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
There's a bit of a difference between half a dozen or so people being refused entry to a pub/club, and several hundred being refused entry to a football ground.
Is there? because good planning would reduce the several hundred into smaller groups so there would be less to deal with at any one time. That's just my opinion.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:03
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
Is there? because good planning would reduce the several hundred into smaller groups so there would be less to deal with at any one time. That's just my opinion.
And yet you've not offered any suggestion of even a rough plan that could achieve this.

It's true what they say about things being easier said than done.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:08
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
And yet you've not offered any suggestion of even a rough plan that could achieve this.

It's true what they say about things being easier said than done.
Well for a start you could have a police 'checkpoint' say 30-50 yards up the road monitoring how people are behaving as the walk along the street. They wouldn't all be congregated into a small area and therefore be easier to deal with - might not stop every drunk fan getting in but it would be far better than letting them all in.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:11
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
Well for a start you could have a police 'checkpoint' say 30-50 yards up the road monitoring how people are behaving as the walk along the street. They wouldn't all be congregated into a small area and therefore be easier to deal with - might not stop every drunk fan getting in but it would be far better than letting them all in.
30-50 yards is still pretty close. At Dens, you don't even reach Tannadice.

Then when you get further out, there's at least four different approaches. Combined with still needing to police both inside the ground and the immediate area, the resources just don't exist.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:14
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
I was out for Mad Friday last night
Time travel is possible!

You honestly think that would have ended well, when you had entire busloads who had booked pubs in Dundee almost from opening time?
They have a job to do and didn't do it properly.

Would it have been that difficult for the police to go round venues where they knew buses were booked in, like the 67 Club and Dundee Social Club, to remind the licensee and staff about their responsibilities? The police could also have walked around the pub reminding fans that if they were drunk then there are committing an offence. Whilst it wouldn't have solved it 100% it would have had an impact.

Likewise would it have been that difficult for the police to be on Tannadice Street to stop fans who were mortalled getting to the turnstiles? I've seen fans who have had too much being stopped en route to other grounds.

It's for the same reason the police and stewards change their attitude depending on who we're playing --- teams with smaller supports = easy to manage, troublemakers can be dealt with with little hassle. Teams with bigger supports = more difficult, real terms number of troublemakers increases so easier to just try and contain it.
Easy answer to that, employ more stewards and have a bigger police presence when bigger supports are there.
timboy is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:15
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
Time travel is possible!
Feels like just last night
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:21
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
30-50 yards is still pretty close. At Dens, you don't even reach Tannadice.

Then when you get further out, there's at least four different approaches. Combined with still needing to police both inside the ground and the immediate area, the resources just don't exist.
If Tayside Police can't spare say 10 officers to monitor an area around Dens Park on matchday then they should employ more officers.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 01:34
timboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 26,381
If Tayside Police can't spare say 10 officers to monitor an area around Dens Park on matchday then they should employ more officers.
Doesn't even need to be Tayside Police, get officers from FoCus.

They have a huge budget that has allowed them to go to Belfast, Swansea, Madrid, Rennes, Newcastle, Udine, Amsterdam, Helsinki, Helsingborg and Auchinleck over the last couple of years.
timboy is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 11:36
pedrok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,089
So Sandaza claiming he was advised not to bless himself when he joined the new club.

Utter disgrace that in this day and age Catholic players at this club are still being told not to bless themselves.
pedrok is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 12:07
bhoy07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
So Sandaza claiming he was advised not to bless himself when he joined the new club.

Utter disgrace that in this day and age Catholic players at this club are still being told not to bless themselves.
An Ibrox source has denied it. So someone isn't telling the truth.
bhoy07 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 12:11
The_Sleeper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 116,685
An Ibrox source has denied it. So someone isn't telling the truth.
And I'll bet you wot you like, his first name aint KEVIN?
The_Sleeper is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 12:44
bunk_medal
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,713
I've seen fans who have had too much being stopped en route to other grounds.
I've seen this happen once or twice, but for the most part drunk fans still get into the stadium. Police/stewards seem to just rely on removing fans from the stadium during the game rather than stopping them getting in.

It doesn't sound like policing/stewarding was any worse at this game than any other. It's always set up in such a way that you can deal with a few random troublemakers, but not 40+.
bunk_medal is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 12:45
pedrok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,089
An Ibrox source has denied it. So someone isn't telling the truth.
Strange how it is a 'source' and not the club itself that has denied it
pedrok is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 12:49
misawa97
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,516
So Sandaza claiming he was advised not to bless himself when he joined the new club.

Utter disgrace that in this day and age Catholic players at this club are still being told not to bless themselves.
Why would Sandaza lie? What does he have to gain by doing that?

It doesnt shock me. Old club or new club the values are clearly the same.
misawa97 is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 13:13
Mark.
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
Kelvin Wilson offered a 2-match ban for violent conduct.
Mark. is offline  
Old 28-12-2012, 13:15
Uriah
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,383
Kelvin Wilson offered a 2-match ban for violent conduct.
'Offered'
Uriah is offline  
 
Closed Thread




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37.