|
||||||||
Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 20) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,816
|
Quote:
Whether you agree with it or not, Rangers should have gone to CAS or lodged an official complaint to FIFA - not go to the CoS.
ps quit posting stuff before me ... ya bugger.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Quote:
It was still deemed illegal - you cannot hand out punishments that aren't in your rule book ... that is the bottom line - if you want to punish someone severely make sure you can hand that punishment out in the first place.
ps quit posting stuff before me ... ya bugger. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
It appears the embargo is one of two options - Green has the option of letting the appeal tribunal reconvene and apply a new punishment.
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,045
|
If the SFA had gotten their way and put newco in Div 1, would they be bringing all this up now? It seems to me that now that newco are consigned to Div 3, and won't be involved in any tv deal, that the SFA have decided to put the boot in and make an example of them. Perhaps, to dissuade any other SPL club from flirting with the idea that liquidation is the easy way out. Today certainly seems like a change of tone regarding newco compared to before the SFL vote.
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,622
|
If a court has ruld that the transfer embargo is illegal how can the SFA insist that Rangers agree to a transfer embargo? Is that not incitement to break the law?
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
If a court has ruld that the transfer embargo is illegal how can the SFA insist that Rangers agree to a transfer embargo? Is that not incitement to break the law?
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
I think the SFA had probably tried to do Rangers a favour by not suspending them in the first place but instead seen it blow up in their face.
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,622
|
Quote:
It was illegal as a punishment. But as a condition of transference of membership, they can pretty much do as they please
So if I want to get rid of the mother-in-law I make her murder a condition of someone joining my club?
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
Even if it's illegal?
So if I want to get rid of the mother-in-law I make her murder a condition of someone joining my club? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,622
|
Quote:
It was only illegal because they gave a punishment that was not in the rule book. As a condition of membership they can pretty much say to newco that if they don't want to accept a ban then no membership. That leaves the choice to newco whether to accept it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
If Rangers are forced to accept a transfer embargo will they be able to field a team?
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,622
|
Quote:
They would still be able to register under 19s. So, a team of kids. If this happens, the likelihood of newco Rangers running away with the Div 3 title are pretty slim.
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
If the Scottish third division is anything like minor league football in England, it will be inhabited by psychopaths for who the ball plays little part in the game. Some of these young kids could have a very short career.
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Maybe we should have the official SPL thread?
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
what is the status of this new club?
'cos reading the last four pages, i have no ******* idea what it is!!!!!! they don't have a name? (THE RANGERS? RANGERS FC NEWCO? WHATEVER THEY'RE BLOODY CALLED????) they don't have a corporate identity!!! and that donkey BHOY07 said they aren't even REGISTERED with the SFA still!!!!! NO HISTORY will or can be transferred, only the morons think this happens! the old management will be dealt with with all the problems associated ..... and the newco should not have any embargos put upon them ..... unless someone has something else! |
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Jenzie, do you WRITE for THE SUN?
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
Quote:
Jenzie, do you WRITE for THE SUN?
![]() yeah i said READ it ..... and i'm ranting becaue no one came out with a concrete statement on all this |
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
I wonder if Doncaster's reluctance to talk about the TV deal and commercial contracts is because all or most parties have decided that their investments amount to peanuts anyway, so they're as well staying in?
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Quote:
what is the status of this new club?
'cos reading the last four pages, i have no ******* idea what it is!!!!!! they don't have a name? (THE RANGERS? RANGERS FC NEWCO? WHATEVER THEY'RE BLOODY CALLED????) they don't have a corporate identity!!! and that donkey BHOY07 said they aren't even REGISTERED with the SFA still!!!!! NO HISTORY will or can be transferred, only the morons think this happens! the old management will be dealt with with all the problems associated ..... and the newco should not have any embargos put upon them ..... unless someone has something else! BTW how dare you insult donkeys. |
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,519
|
Quote:
I wonder if Doncaster's reluctance to talk about the TV deal and commercial contracts is because all or most parties have decided that their investments amount to peanuts anyway, so they're as well staying in?
Sky will not pull out and leave BT with direct access to the SPL tv rights. Next summer Sky need the SPL rights otherwise BT will buy them and start attracting Scottish Sky subscribers. |
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 189
|
Quote:
they have already been relegated three divisions, fined 160k, half their team have been allowed to move to other clubs free of charge, now they are to either stop playing football altogether or accept a ban on buying players for a year, ohh, and there are hoards of foaming at the mouth opposition hoping to have their previous wins stripped away into their own trophy cabinets.
a tad harsh dont you think? I think some people need to step back, calm down and look at this calmly and with some sort of objectivity. Looks like a which hunt to me, nothing more, nothing less.
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,713
|
Even if the transfer embargo was in place Rangers would still comfortably win the Third Division in my opinion. In fact, I think it'd be a waste of money for them to spend any sort of cash on established players this year anyway. It's hard to overstate just how poor the standard is down there.
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Incidentally, the SFA are within their rights to impose a transfer embargo on NewCo as a condition of transferring Rangers' membership. They're also within their rights to demand that Charles Green dress up as a chicken and Ally McCoist sit in the dugout with a banana balanced on his head. Because... Quote:
16. It is not permissible for a member to transfer directly or indirectly its membership
of the Association to another member or to any other entity and any such transfer or attempt to effect such a transfer is prohibited save as otherwise provided in this Article 16. Any member desirous of transferring its membership to another entity within its own administrative group for the purpose of internal solvent reconstruction must apply to the Board for permission to effect such transfer, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any other application for transfer of membership will be reviewed by the Board which will have complete discretion to reject or to grant such application on such terms and conditions as the Board may think fit |
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
Quote:
Incidentally, the SFA are within their rights to impose a transfer embargo on NewCo as a condition of transferring Rangers' membership. They're also within their rights to demand that Charles Green dress up as a chicken and Ally McCoist sit in the dugout with a banana balanced on his head. Because...
then how can they be able to play in any league under the SFA then??? |
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
so they still aren't a member of the SFA then?
then how can they be able to play in any league under the SFA then??? |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37.



So if I want to get rid of the mother-in-law I make her murder a condition of someone joining my club? 
