Rangers deny they've agreed to a delayed transfer embargo. This is giving me a sare heed!
Scottish Fitba Thread (Part 20)
9 of 152
Originally Posted by Cantona07:
“...Dundee Utd and Man Utd fan...”
“...Dundee Utd and Man Utd fan...”
You must be my arch nemesis.
Signed, a Dundee and Liverpool fan
Originally Posted by OMTT:
“Rangers deny they've agreed to a delayed transfer embargo. This is giving me a sare heed!”
“Rangers deny they've agreed to a delayed transfer embargo. This is giving me a sare heed!”
Surely the SFA have Rangers over the proverbial barrel? The rules of transferring membership are clear --- any sanction can be imposed. So it doesn't matter what was said in court; a transfer embargo is available as a sanction, as is making Ally McCoist wear a funny hat during every game.
Originally Posted by Cantona07:
“Eh?
Yeah that cuts deep to a Dundee Utd and Man Utd fan. Well done.”
“Eh?
Yeah that cuts deep to a Dundee Utd and Man Utd fan. Well done.”
i wasn't aiming at you specifically, just puting it out there.
Originally Posted by Mark.:
“You must be my arch nemesis.
Signed, a Dundee and Liverpool fan
Surely the SFA have Rangers over the proverbial barrel? The rules of transferring membership are clear --- any sanction can be imposed. So it doesn't matter what was said in court; a transfer embargo is available as a sanction, as is making Ally McCoist wear a funny hat during every game.”
“You must be my arch nemesis.
Signed, a Dundee and Liverpool fan
Surely the SFA have Rangers over the proverbial barrel? The rules of transferring membership are clear --- any sanction can be imposed. So it doesn't matter what was said in court; a transfer embargo is available as a sanction, as is making Ally McCoist wear a funny hat during every game.”
I think I am his arch nemesis, but you can be my deputy if you want!
I would love to see the SFA implement a ruling like Ally has to wear a big Pink stupid hat every game, as part of their punishment!
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“I think I am his arch nemesis, but you can be my deputy if you want!
I would love to see the SFA implement a ruling like Ally has to wear a big Pink stupid hat every game, as part of their punishment!”
“I think I am his arch nemesis, but you can be my deputy if you want!
I would love to see the SFA implement a ruling like Ally has to wear a big Pink stupid hat every game, as part of their punishment!
”
Not green and white hoops, then
Originally Posted by Eater Sundae:
“Not green and white hoops, then”
“Not green and white hoops, then”
Now be fair, no-one is trying to get him killed!
Originally Posted by Gordie1:
“i wasn't aiming at you specifically, just puting it out there.”
“i wasn't aiming at you specifically, just puting it out there.”
You really are pathetic.
ah whataboutery, if yo can't think of anything else you use whataboutery to trump them
well done
so celtic according to you don't have the european cup from 67, so that star on their jersey means **** all?
well done
Originally Posted by cuttysark:
“How many times, no matter what they think. You cannot transfer history. Does this mean that Sevco now owe HMRC mega millions of ££££££££££s , cos that's part of their tainted history.”
“How many times, no matter what they think. You cannot transfer history. Does this mean that Sevco now owe HMRC mega millions of ££££££££££s , cos that's part of their tainted history.”
so celtic according to you don't have the european cup from 67, so that star on their jersey means **** all?
Originally Posted by Gordie1:
“Well done.
”
“
Well done.”
Just made my point. Wish it had been my day but, I suspect, it has been a long time since you've done that for any one.
Sad little child ... don't forget to get Mum to tuck you in.
Nite, nite wee pet.
Originally Posted by ItHasPotential:
“ah whataboutery, if yo can't think of anything else you use whataboutery to trump them
well done
so celtic according to you don't have the european cup from 67, so that star on their jersey means **** all?”
“ah whataboutery, if yo can't think of anything else you use whataboutery to trump them
well done
so celtic according to you don't have the european cup from 67, so that star on their jersey means **** all?”
I shouldn't ask, but why did Cltic not win the 1967 EC?
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“I shouldn't ask, but why did Cltic not win the 1967 EC?”
“I shouldn't ask, but why did Cltic not win the 1967 EC?”
well they did if they kept their history, however they changed company in 94 and as we all know because they transfered all assets to a new company they lose their history, according to cuttysark
me i don't care what any **** says, celtic stil celtic, leeds is still leeds, rangers is still rangers
Originally Posted by Cantona07:
“Only in the mind of one set of supporters.
Many of your modern titles were won while operating the EBT scheme. People will not forget that regardless of what "history" is kept.
Im afraid thats just the way it is.”
“Only in the mind of one set of supporters.
Many of your modern titles were won while operating the EBT scheme. People will not forget that regardless of what "history" is kept.
Im afraid thats just the way it is.”
EBT's were not illegal - even Celtic operated one. Of course how you administer them is a whole different matter and one that has still not been decided yet .... but with your vast knowledge of Scottish football you knew that already didn't you.
Originally Posted by ItHasPotential:
“well they did if they kept their history, however they changed company in 94 and as we all know because they transfered all assets to a new company they lose their history, according to cuttysark
me i don't care what any **** says, celtic stil celtic, leeds is still leeds, rangers is still rangers”
“well they did if they kept their history, however they changed company in 94 and as we all know because they transfered all assets to a new company they lose their history, according to cuttysark
me i don't care what any **** says, celtic stil celtic, leeds is still leeds, rangers is still rangers”
Yes, I thought it would be this nonsense. Celtic did not change their company in 1994, it is the same company, with the same company number that they have had for over 100 years, they changed their status to a plc. I am sure this has been explained many times to you, but either you cannot or will not accept it and therefore I will not get into any further debate with you on this matter.
Leeds are the same club as the excited with a CVA, something that the old Rangers did not do. Had they managed to exit with a CVA, then they would have been the same club, but they didn't, they will soon be liquated and they will be no more.
A new club will start in the third division, with a new name, new badge and new strip, and of course no history. Assuming they manage to get a license.
Originally Posted by crofter:
“EBT's were not illegal - even Celtic operated one. Of course how you administer them is a whole different matter and one that has still not been decided yet .... but with your vast knowledge of Scottish football you knew that already didn't you.”
“EBT's were not illegal - even Celtic operated one. Of course how you administer them is a whole different matter and one that has still not been decided yet .... but with your vast knowledge of Scottish football you knew that already didn't you.
”
Actually, it has been decided, HMRC have handed the bill to the old club, they have appealed the total. The decision that Rangers operated them wrongly has been made by HMRC. What has still to be decided is how much the old club owe.
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“Actually, it has been decided, HMRC have handed the bill to the old club, they have appealed the total. The decision that Rangers operated them wrongly has been made by HMRC. What has still to be decided is how much the old club owe.”
“Actually, it has been decided, HMRC have handed the bill to the old club, they have appealed the total. The decision that Rangers operated them wrongly has been made by HMRC. What has still to be decided is how much the old club owe.”
Source??
Originally Posted by StoneColdSaysSo:
“Also means a transfer of membership so the clubs history remains intact
”
“Also means a transfer of membership so the clubs history remains intact
”
The football club has been liquidated.
You are supporting a new club.
Duff and Phelps have already accepted this.
Originally Posted by Gordie1:
“And young boys were being abused within celtic walls by celtic staff while while they won titles.
People will never forget that either, Im afraid that's just the way it is.”
“And young boys were being abused within celtic walls by celtic staff while while they won titles.
People will never forget that either, Im afraid that's just the way it is.”
Celtic fans post condolences about the son of an ex-Ranger player dying.
Orc filth try to point score. That is why the rest of Scotland hate some of your fans.
Originally Posted by ItHasPotential:
“well they did if they kept their history, however they changed company in 94 and as we all know because they transfered all assets to a new company they lose their history, according to cuttysark
me i don't care what any **** says, celtic stil celtic, leeds is still leeds, rangers is still rangers”
“well they did if they kept their history, however they changed company in 94 and as we all know because they transfered all assets to a new company they lose their history, according to cuttysark
me i don't care what any **** says, celtic stil celtic, leeds is still leeds, rangers is still rangers”
Except, as has been pointed out to you by Pedrok, but you seem too dim to understand, Celtic never changed company. What is our company number? What was it when we first became a company?
Your argument is horrifically bad when it is based on false perception.
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“Actually, it has been decided, HMRC have handed the bill to the old club, they have appealed the total. The decision that Rangers operated them wrongly has been made by HMRC. What has still to be decided is how much the old club owe.”
“Actually, it has been decided, HMRC have handed the bill to the old club, they have appealed the total. The decision that Rangers operated them wrongly has been made by HMRC. What has still to be decided is how much the old club owe.”
<Lance Corporal Jones>Shoost you! They don't like it up them!</Jones>
Originally Posted by pedrok:
“Yes, I thought it would be this nonsense. Celtic did not change their company in 1994, it is the same company, with the same company number that they have had for over 100 years, they changed their status to a plc. I am sure this has been explained many times to you, but either you cannot or will not accept it and therefore I will not get into any further debate with you on this matter.
Leeds are the same club as the excited with a CVA, something that the old Rangers did not do. Had they managed to exit with a CVA, then they would have been the same club, but they didn't, they will soon be liquated and they will be no more.
A new club will start in the third division, with a new name, new badge and new strip, and of course no history. Assuming they manage to get a license.”
“Yes, I thought it would be this nonsense. Celtic did not change their company in 1994, it is the same company, with the same company number that they have had for over 100 years, they changed their status to a plc. I am sure this has been explained many times to you, but either you cannot or will not accept it and therefore I will not get into any further debate with you on this matter.
Leeds are the same club as the excited with a CVA, something that the old Rangers did not do. Had they managed to exit with a CVA, then they would have been the same club, but they didn't, they will soon be liquated and they will be no more.
A new club will start in the third division, with a new name, new badge and new strip, and of course no history. Assuming they manage to get a license.”
You do realise that every major club has a holding/parent company that is set up to protect the actual club in events like these?? Rangers had it, Celtic have it, Man Utd have it, Liverpool have it ...
NEWCO not NEWCLUB it isn't exactly rocket science fella.
Originally Posted by crofter:
“Source??”
“Source??
”
The current First Tier Tribunal that has been sitting!
What do you think they were doing?
Originally Posted by crofter:
“You do realise that every major club has a holding/parent company that is set up to protect the actual club in events like these?? Rangers had it, Celtic have it, Man Utd have it, Liverpool have it ...
NEWCO not NEWCLUB it isn't exactly rocket science fella.”
“You do realise that every major club has a holding/parent company that is set up to protect the actual club in events like these?? Rangers had it, Celtic have it, Man Utd have it, Liverpool have it ...
NEWCO not NEWCLUB it isn't exactly rocket science fella.
”
Sorry, but it is late now. Too tired for any of this nonsense.
It has been explained, again, you either cannot or will not understand.
Originally Posted by timboy:
“
Celtic fans post condolences about the son of an ex-Ranger player dying.
Orc filth try to point score. That is why the rest of Scotland hate some of your fans.”
“
Celtic fans post condolences about the son of an ex-Ranger player dying.
Orc filth try to point score. That is why the rest of Scotland hate some of your fans.”
Point score?, I never mentioned the death anywhere, neither have i commented.
Sad that you would bring up someones death in an attempt pointscore....think about it.
Originally Posted by crofter:
“EBT's were not illegal - even Celtic operated one. Of course how you administer them is a whole different matter and one that has still not been decided yet .... but with your vast knowledge of Scottish football you knew that already didn't you.”
“EBT's were not illegal - even Celtic operated one. Of course how you administer them is a whole different matter and one that has still not been decided yet .... but with your vast knowledge of Scottish football you knew that already didn't you.
”
If EBTs are used to pay employees and avoid paying tax on wages then that is illegal. That is what Rangers did. You don't need a vast knowledge of Scottish Football for that. Was it not Papac who stopped being paid appearance money because the EBT was covering that part of his salary?
Originally Posted by Gordie1:
“Point score?, I never mentioned the death anywhere, neither have i commented.
Sad that you would bring up someones death in an attempt pointscore....think about it.”
“Point score?, I never mentioned the death anywhere, neither have i commented.
Sad that you would bring up someones death in an attempt pointscore....think about it.
”
You are the one who brings up child abuse just to point score, when it has absoutely no revelance to this thread.
Originally Posted by CELT1987:
“You are the one who brings up child abuse just to point score, when it has absoutely no revelance to this thread.”
“You are the one who brings up child abuse just to point score, when it has absoutely no revelance to this thread.”
It has a direct relation to the post i was responding to.
Someone saying people wont forget what was going on at Rangers football club while titles were being won, my point was far worse things were going on within celtics ground when they won titles.
they are far from the holy than thou they portray themselves to be.
But of course this thread being so anti Rangers, i didnt expect anything less.
9 of 152
