I saw a few minutes of her on The Kumars at Number 42 last night. She looked well out of her depth in a comedy environment.
Is Natasha Kaplinsky ''the new Cilla Black''? (merged)
3 of 3
I disagree with the last comment. I thought she was fantastic on The Kumars at Number 42. She seemed to be really enjoying herself and had good rapport with the everyone. Also, I think she looked stunning!!!!!!!
I think Natasha Kaplinsky was/is a great host. She has the experience of being a contestant that really added to the backstage interviews. It makes sense that someone like that should be the co-host. I have no idea of Tess Daley's background but it doesn't seem to me that she is a dancer... having said that; on the It Takes Two programme on BBC2 it works that Claudia is not a dancer. I think it adds class to the Sat night programme when the presenters have something to do with the subject they are presenting and it works that Claudia does not in the week because she is then able to interview and gain knowledge and ask the questions that the non-dancing public want to know. Anything make sense? Anyway, this is my first post. Hi everyone!
Originally Posted by Winifred:
“I disagree with the last comment. I thought she was fantastic on The Kumars at Number 42. She seemed to be really enjoying herself and had good rapport with the everyone. Also, I think she looked stunning!!!!!!!”
“I disagree with the last comment. I thought she was fantastic on The Kumars at Number 42. She seemed to be really enjoying herself and had good rapport with the everyone. Also, I think she looked stunning!!!!!!!
”
I only saw a few minutes and I may have got a false perspective, so I withdraw my remarks. However, she did have too much make-up on
Originally Posted by lonepiner:
“I only saw a few minutes and I may have got a false perspective, so I withdraw my remarks. However, she did have too much make-up on”
“I only saw a few minutes and I may have got a false perspective, so I withdraw my remarks. However, she did have too much make-up on
”
Well, I watched the whole of it and I think you were right. If only we were as pleased with her as she is, we'd all be happier.
Originally Posted by lonepiner:
“I saw a few minutes of her on The Kumars at Number 42 last night. She looked well out of her depth in a comedy environment.”
“I saw a few minutes of her on The Kumars at Number 42 last night. She looked well out of her depth in a comedy environment.”
Yes for most of it she seemed very uneasy , was it because she didnt have a script to work from??
Dermot o leary was good though, he was in the 'joke' style of the show straight away. Comes from all those years on BB i bet
I really couldnt understand why she was on that show. Its not really her!!! But i thought she handled it well.
Originally Posted by laura82:
“I really couldnt understand why she was on that show. Its not really her!!! But i thought she handled it well.”
“I really couldnt understand why she was on that show. Its not really her!!! But i thought she handled it well.”
She was on it because she is a 'meja ho' who will do anything to get on tv.
Originally Posted by mrfreeze:
“She was on it because she is a 'meja ho' who will do anything to get on tv.
”
“She was on it because she is a 'meja ho' who will do anything to get on tv.
”
What is or who is a 'meja ho' and why do you always refer to Natasha as a 'meja ho'.
Originally Posted by Winifred:
“What do you peeps think, is she ''the new Cilla Black''?”
“What do you peeps think, is she ''the new Cilla Black''?”
Hope not, there's something about Natasha that I hate.
the girl who reads the six o'clock news now "Sophie" somebody or other use to present the breakfast news and was much nicer looking...especially when she had her boots on as well . Natasha kerplunksky seems very shallow to me. i wouldnt mind seeing her in her underwear though..but then I,m not that choosey
. Natasha kerplunksky seems very shallow to me. i wouldnt mind seeing her in her underwear though..but then I,m not that choosey
Originally Posted by lonepiner:
“She's not nearly irritating enough to be tarred with that brush! And she's attractive. She can probably sing too. No comparison I reckon she's a bit too serious to want completely down the entertainment highway, she likes to dabble in grown-up broadcasting, but flap around in the fun stuff too. But who knows, eh?
Welcome to DS, Winifred”
“She's not nearly irritating enough to be tarred with that brush! And she's attractive. She can probably sing too. No comparison
I reckon she's a bit too serious to want completely down the entertainment highway, she likes to dabble in grown-up broadcasting, but flap around in the fun stuff too. But who knows, eh?Welcome to DS, Winifred
”
I agree totally - in as much as CB is a talentless, Irritating abomination that has no place in the world of entertainment WHATSOEVER - I think comparing Natasha to her is a huge insult to the girl.
To borrow (well almost totally plagerise) something a comedian (can't remember which one) once said (not about Ms. Black - though I am saying it about Ms. Black) when she opens her mouth a bad noise comes out - a bit like a cat being dragged somewhere a cat shouldn't be dragged
Wow, a lot of you certainly don't like Natasha.
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!
Originally Posted by Lisejane:
“Wow, a lot of you certainly don't like Natasha.
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!”
“Wow, a lot of you certainly don't like Natasha.
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!”
Couldnt agree more!!!!!
Originally Posted by Lisejane:
“Wow, a lot of you certainly don't like Natasha.
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!”
“Wow, a lot of you certainly don't like Natasha.
Personally, I think she's great. She's a classy presenter, and always looks stunning. She comes across as a genuinly nice person. You should all give her a break!”
She is lovely!!! So charming and graceful!!! Plus she seems really down to earth!
Nat
xxx
Originally Posted by minihoy:
“She is lovely!!! So charming and graceful!!! Plus she seems really down to earth!
Nat
xxx”
“She is lovely!!! So charming and graceful!!! Plus she seems really down to earth!
Nat
xxx”
Exactly, as can be seen by this article.
http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/View...ticleID=907974
3 of 3
