Why 'search for Jesus' when it's really Judas' show?! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,754
|
Why 'search for Jesus' when it's really Judas' show?!
I know, I know - I shouldn't be nit-picking like this, but 'Jesus Christ Superstar' isn't told from Jesus'* point of view at all, but it's the last few days of Jesus' life told from Judas'* point of view. Therefore it isn't a 'Jesus' show at all, but a 'Judas' one!
The ultimate irony being that the 'crowd pleasing big number', Superstar (which was sung as the 'Jesus hopefuls' group number' on Sunday night) is about Jesus, but is actually sung by Judas! Judas gets three 'big' numbersin JCS, either totally solo or mostly solo (Heaven on Their Minds, Judas' Death and the 'money tune' Superstar). Heck, even Mary Magdalene gets three 'big' numbers either solo or mostly solo (Everything's Alright, I Don't Know How to Love Him and Could we Start Again Please). Jesus gets only one 'big' number as a solo, and that's Gethsemane, same has Herod and Pilate in fact (King Herod's Song and Trial Before Pilate respectively). Yes, Gethsemane is a hard song to sing with an amazing almost three octave range, but the fact remains that it's the only solo Jesus song. And yes, Jesus also has parts in other songs (such as Hosanna and The Last Supper) but if you have the libretto handy, what is listed as 'The Crowd' also get as much to sing in the show too! JCS is one of ALW/Tim Rice's true ensemble pieces from the point of view of nearly every main character getting a fair chance to sing/shine, with Judas and Mary getting the lion's share of the lead songs. But, just because it's called 'Jesus Christ, Superstar' doesn't mean Jesus is the main character! So, for me, this 'search for Jesus' lost its credibility right from the start because they're looking for the wrong person to sing the wrong part. The other 'search for a star' shows on the BBC worked because they were looking for the right person to sing the right part! I love 'JCS' and have seen it live on stage many times (including the late 90s revival in the West End with Steve Balsamo as Jesus) but for me the ultimate production is, and will always be, the film with Ted Neely and Carl Anderson as Jesus and Judas respectively. I'll shut up now - no one will agree with me anyway! * PS - The apostrophe after the 's', but no extra 's' after the apostrophe (as in "Jesus' point of view" and "Judas' point of view") is grammatically correct (I teach Literacy!) but although the plural of many men called 'Jesus' might be 'Jesuses', that bit still sounds awkward! Maybe that's because there was only ever, and will only ever, be one Jesus!!! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glawster
Posts: 1,785
|
I think you make a very good point/points.
I am also slightly worried that Tim Minchin is Judas. It is an ensemble piece as you describe but for me Judas is THE part in this musical, he is the character I came away from the theatre focused on and I felt was the perspective of the audience in the musical, its like we go on Judas' journey with him and he asks the questions we might. I love Tim Minchin but at the moment cant see that he has the vocals for it. I do hope I'm wrong. (No one will beat Carl Anderson in this role for me, the man was a vocal god) Seems odd to me that we might end up with a stronger singer playing Jesus than Judas. If it was me I would want the part of Judas (and I'm female). Just thinking about this stuff makes me realise how much I like this musical
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,323
|
When I went to see Joseph with Keith Jack I was mesmorised by the Narrator ,played so brilliantly by Tara Bethan who was on the Dorothy shows .She stole the show .Sometimes the lead role is not always the one to enchant
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Services: steam
Posts: 23,364
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Services: steam
Posts: 23,364
|
Lost sight of Tara. She was going into a Welsh Tv show but as I can't understand Welsh and the show's site wasn't brilliant I never could work out if she did go there or still was there. She was another strange case of someone who got songs that made her look/sound nothing like Nancy and who might have done very differently with more appropriate material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,323
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 569
|
There would be uproar among the religious community if we were searching for Judas!
Jesus is more of an acting part rather than a singing part so it's annoying that the acting has been sidelined. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,754
|
Quote:
Quote:
So it doesn't seem to make sense to suddenly move the goal posts now - you can't suddenly use the excuse of "well, it's really a Judas show, but seeing as the part of Jesus doesn't require as much we'll search for him anyway because it's less of a risk." No, this isn't about risk inmo, it's simply that they've done the search for Jesus for this musical because they think the general audience at home either don't know, or don't care, that (despite the musical being called Jesus Christ, Superstar) Jesus is not the main character, but really a Judas' show with the main male role being Judas, and the story of Jesus' last days on earth told entirely from Judas' point of view. Jesus is no more than a co-star, not THE star. It's this disregard and cynicism for the audience which is the main reason why I'm not watching this particular 'search for'. I'll stick with my DVD of Ted Neeley and Carl Anderson, thank you - they will always be the benchmark for this musical for me. (If anyone reading this hasn't seen the original film version go out and buy it!) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: On the first boat out of here
Posts: 4,443
|
I dunno. You'll be telling us that Amadeus isn't about Mozart but is about Salieri next.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Services: steam
Posts: 23,364
|
Quote:
- Nancy wasn't a very big role. Oliver and Fagin are bigger. Its a couple of big songs and reprises.He wanted a vulnerable young Nancy too - which could have concealed many issues. Joseph isn't that big as roles go either - 2 big songs. The narrator does more. Most (?) of the Joseph's have played the role since. 3 Nancy's have played Nancy, and probably most of the rest could have. Dorothy is a round a lot , but hse's also not go that much to sing. its notable he has never tried to cast a role as big as Christine or even someone like Eponine that requres a lot of acting or a role like Cosette that needs unusual vocal skills.. This time he's got a role thats more like Nancy. His problem is that if you allow for age, acting ability, and rock presence he's got no one ideal to play it - even though its not that demanding with 3 solos. I think Judas raises all sort of problems as well as having a bigger sing.. There's a stereotype of Jesus - but the stereotype of Judas could really be difficult to work with? Do you want people voting for the one who looks most shifty? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote:
Jesus is given the top billing in JCS. IMHO The roles are more or less equal. The film you mention is not the best example of JCS. On film the audience only see the shots the director wants them to see. Lots of shots of Judas sulking and skulking do not mnke him the main character. See it live. Then judge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote:
Joseph, Christine, Cosette and Eponine don't come anywhere near close to the role of JC. Also Judas isn't meant to be or look shifty. Although the film with Carl Anderson makes him look that way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,287
|
Quote:
![]() Saw the original production twice and Judas certainly was not the lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,287
|
Quote:
What has infuriated me is that its only about six months ago that I had a big clear out and binned the programmes. Its sods law of course that I'd like to look at the brochures now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,917
|
That was the original London production. It was at the Palace Theatre. I saw that. It was a great production. I still have my programmes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 569
|
Jesus is ultimately the main character. The story may be told through Judas' POV but it's all about Jesus. They need somebody with some charisma, and the only two I think have any are Nathan and Roger.
Personally I think Roger would have been great as Judas. Maybe he could be a Judas understudy? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,834
|
I don't think this matters in the slightest. As others have said, Nancy's not the 'main' part in Oliver by any stretch of the imagination.
One of the key things is to cast a character that the audience know already, so that they can bring that understanding to their decision when they vote. Otherwise, engagement is going to be low. Jesus fits this bill, in that the audience at home have an idea of what they want to see in terms of personality/character/'look' of the actor - and this was true of Maria/Nancy/Joseph/Dorothy. Much as I would love to see a search for say Nathan Detriot in Guys & Dolls, the character is too obscure to work in this format. Looking at past shows, I see most comparison with Maria, because both parts are really tough sings. Joseph, for example, isn't a particularly taxing part as leading man role's go (thinking about acting/singing requirements). Maybe that's why Any Dream was the most successful of these shows, because they were able to take quite a wide range of experience/singing/acting ability into the final 12. And that meant a wider variety of characters to get behind, more 'journey' candidates to support. JCS's final 11 are quite samey by comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,287
|
Quote:
Phllip Schofield even managed it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6
|
I have joined DS after reading some of the comments of which I totally disagree Nothing to do with who should be Jesus but the personal snide remarks directed ar both ALW and auditionees physical appearance. Ears, lisp. frog face etc. since when were these insulting remarks deemed to be part of a TV forum?
This Superstar must be the biggest mistake ALW has ever made in his career. First to transfer to ITV where hooligans shout out and scream in the audience. Boo if their favourite is criticised, and a forum which concentrates more on physical imperfections than a critique of the programme. Not the last few may I add. I have watched all the ALW seaches for Maria, Joseph, Dorothy, Nancy et al and realised then that ALW gets who he wants( other than Jodie- yet she personifies Nancy) His shows Phantom, Cats and so on have brought musical theatre back to life. He appears a very strange introverted man who in the past at auditions has just said "no don't call us we'll call you" as is usual in showbusiness. This Cowell type rejection " this is so hard for me -pause- I can''t do this- pause- a few tears- and so on is ridiculous. ALW is given corney jokes to try, in ITV's eyes to give him a personality transplant only makes a brilliant man look foolish.( he probably thinks he is so amusing) Very sad really. This forums favourite appears to be Nathan- who I looked at on You tube, before it was removed. Whining about the judging. Just accept and forget, like Jon did so graciously. In my oopinion Nathan does not fit my perception of Jesus. Robert Powell yes and Colin Firth as Darcy, they fit perfectly. Nathan to me is just too muscular and big. Someone else said he should be in WWRY. I agree. As for voting and wasting your money going to line ALW's pockets. I don't think this actually happens. I understand gives lots to the performing arts from these programmes? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 569
|
I think they only gave money to performing arts when it was on the bbc- there was/is a bbc performing arts fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Services: steam
Posts: 23,364
|
Quote:
Thats the whole point about Judas. The public would have no guide what to vote for and it would be even more random what feature they would decide on - too nice to be Judas, too handsome to be Judas, not shifty enough.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,834
|
Quote:
For me, Judas is a brilliant part, requiring real subtlety. I don't trust the public with this one I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,917
|
Quote:
Why on earth couldn't Judas be handsome? Nice- the man cast would be an actor you know! He's not a shifty character either. He just expresses his point of view and questions JC's actions. Through Tim Rice's lyrics the character does this quite brilliantly as do the other characters with their songs. The Jonas brother wasn't hidden away well enough for me in the 25th anniversary DVD. His performance is well documented as weak amongst an otherwise outstanding cast. If you think Christine or Nancy are in any way comparable or bigger roles than Jesus then that's your prerogative. I've seen all the shows you mention - Les Miserables, Oliver, Phantom and JCS on stage and on film. Unfortunately, films/DVDs have a lot to answer for.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:03.




