Originally Posted by Jules 1:
“I liked it to be honest, but it wasn't as good as the opening but that would be near impossible anyway.”
It was always going to be more divisive to an audience than the opening ceremony because the opening ceremony was a timeless spectacle whereas if you didn't like George Michael then that bit was never going to entertain you, though it would have helped if he'd done Club Tropicana. A bit like Adam Ant on Live Aid, that. I liked the combination of Fatboy Slim, The Spice Girls and Wonderwall, it was like being back in 1998.
Originally Posted by theonlyweeman:
“They don't really need to push Family Guy, it usually gets a large enough audience on it's own.
BUT given Zai Bennett has said the Family Guy contract ends this year, and he probably won't renew it. (That's even if it doesn't go to a bidding war - which it will), so it could just be that they don't give a shit.
Also it's produced in 12fps, does HD really do anything?”
Well, I agree with that although of course it was on HD last year. I'm guessing they decided that they'd have to not show it on HD so many times in this run - the last three weeks for a start - that they needn't bother at all. And as you say, it adds nothing. Bennett didn't say he probably wouldn't renew it, he said he wouldn't renew it at any price, although I dunno who'd want it, The Cleveland Show hasn't done much for E4 and it's past its best now anyway.
And there was no real need to promote Gervais being in it because in The Simpsons he wrote it and was virtually playing himself, and he was at the peak of his career, whereas here he was just doing a guest voice. I would be interested in seeing ratings for the new Simpsons episodes on Sky One, by the way, I don't think they're doing much not helped by the nine month break or the fact they're on at 6pm in the middle of summer and the Olympics (Everyone in the Internet: "and they're crap").
Originally Posted by allthingsuk:
“They didn't show Live at the Apollo last night at ten to midnight. At that point, the Closing Ceremony was still going on.”
I like the idea that, however amazing the Closing Ceremony was, thirteen milion people would decide to stay up at 11.50 on a worknight to watch the ten millionth repeat of Live at the Apalling, with a really crappy line-up too. 12,999,999 of whom would presumably have been asleep.
Originally Posted by trickytree1979:
“Beijing and Sydney had higher audiences for the closing ceremony.”
That's because both of them were on a weekend, whereas the opening ceremonies were during the day during the week.
Originally Posted by allthingsuk:
“OUAT doing decently against the opposition. But the Touch of Frost rating is the sort of thing you'd expect on ITV3, not ITV1. Dear me - slaughtered by the opposition. Any ratings for Community Shield?”
Not sure the Community Shield would have got ratings that much lower on Sky, even though it was the first time on free TV since 1987. I hope nobody takes that as a sign people have gone off football because they won't - someone in the paper was despairing today at how the fans were all booing, Ashley Cole was swearing at the ref, John Terry was being John Terry, but that's what you want. They'd have been better off showing the highlights tonight rather than at eleven, because if you were too interested in the Olympics to watch the match live, you'd be even more interested in the Olympics then.