Instead of having to watch the same people all the time, especially Natalie. Do the public really hate her that much that they actually want to see her dramatise her tasks all the time.

I think it would be better if they either all took turns but then that would save the public money on phone calls, wouldnt it.

If the public want to vote, then let the person who has already done the task be exempt from public vote for a few days to give others in the background a turn.

Old Huggy Bear looks as if he could do with a feast of insects.

Don't worry Paul has been keeping tabs ready for next week.

maybe they should do the poll with the trialist exempt from next days voting and can only do 2 trials in first week.

trials are a persons chance to sell theirselves too, so someone like Huggy may be first out due to indifference

I think these trials are getting more and more biased towards Natalie now.

The show should be re-named. "I am Natalie Appleton, get me out of here".

I dont think I am going to be able to watch her tomorrow night.

I agree - would be more interesting. I got fed up with the whole Fash thing too, when he kept being voted to do them.

How about this: if you get more than half your stars, you can't be voted for the next trial?

Couldn't agree more. The trials put a certain contestant on the stage, and give them more air time. Whilst I think some element of public choice needs to remain, a "next day exemption" would be a good idea.

The problem is that ITV probably think we're enjoying watching Natalie suffer. The fact is, I'm not. It's like a neverending, tortuous spiral. Natalie goes to clearing, refuses to do trial, has histerics, can't cross bridge, ensures she gets to do the next trial because of it...

I want to see Sheila do a trial - see some more of her. And more of Nancy and Huggy. But Natalie's attention seeking is getting far too repetitive now.

My final question - Trial or Eviction tomorrow? If it's a trial, let's all vote for anyone except Natalie.

I disagree. I like seing Natalie go up for trials. Watching her wriggle out of them is a hell of a lot more interesting than a load of flies or whatever. I've never really been a fan of the tasks - until now.

I think they're going to need to enforce a format change, and make it so that if you are nominated for a challenge you are exempt from the next one.

Not having the public vote for them at all is not an option, as it would cut off ITV's revenue generation. And that just won't do.

I totally agree, and I joined tonight to beg the public not to vote natalie, Im bored of watching her, she is not entertaining, and after what she did to Sophie tonight was enough. Im not mad about Sophie either but she is at least playing the game and cares about the others, as for Sheila I dont like her either. It would be great to see the others do something then at least we would get to know them a little better before we have to start voting them off.

Hello beckie and welcome to DS. As for pleading with the public, I'm afraid it's a lost cause as the DS posters only make up a minute fraction of the voters - in fact, I think a large percentage of us don't vote at all! But stay and join the madhouse though - it's good fun!

I agree that the public still need to vote but like others here, feel that anybody who has done a trial should be exempt from the vote for at least a few days.

I would love to see Sheila or Huggy do a trial as they have been kept very much in the background. It might also be a good idea to have a few team trials instead of giving this part to solely one person.