• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Strictly Christmas Specials!
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
laura82
15-12-2004
Originally Posted by minihoy:
“Listen darlin' don't come over all 'I know what I'm talking about because I'm a dancer'! Whether u r a dancer or not it doesn;t mean that we can't spot chemistry. I think u r getting mixed up with technicality!! I don't admit to being able to know what each of the steps r and whether or not they r doing them right. The judges said they were technically brilliant and I believed them...it looked good to me (a lay person ..as u put it!). Technically brilliant or not though, they had NO chemistry.....I actually spotted that in the final about J&D dancing for the audience, she is all fake smiles (and I know that is something ballroom dancing is famed for) but they had no element of dancing for each other...it was all about gaining votes and keeping the audience sweet. And good on 'em cos it worked!!! But that doesn't hide the fact that there was no chemistry!!!! Even CRH and Arlene spotted that...would u call them lay people. I think not. Case Closed!

Nat
xxx”

O Nat your way with words is fantastic. You summed it up brilliantly.

And Hutch'net we arent saying that Natasha and Brendan are the best dancers. But they have the best chemistry.
Too me that kind of dancing is about looking like a couple on the floor and too me N&B do.
Id never think that watching Jill and Darren they were a couple.

And lauralou you just backed up your own reasoning for not listening to anything Arlene says. As she knows nothing bout ballroom dancing.
Scissor*Sister
15-12-2004
Go Jill And Darren! I think they are fabulous.

Natasha and Brendan cannot win. Poor Brendan wouldn't be able to fit his big head through the door!
lauralou
15-12-2004
technically listen to len i said, but the others all know chemistry as that is irrelevant what sub-section of dancing you do!
minihoy
15-12-2004
Yes i did listen to Len about technicality....I believe that they are technically great....I listen to CRH about chemistry and he said they had none!

Nat
xxx
Cassandra14
15-12-2004
Originally Posted by yenston:
“Cassandra14- will definitely cast extra votes for you, consider it done. You obviously have excellent taste. But to ensure that Anton and Lesley are in with a good chance of winning perhaps you could inform anybody you know in the UK to vote too. Every vote counts.
thank you thank you thank you

Elena- go on choose Anton and Lesley. You know you want to! Natasha and Brendan have won series 1, Jill and Darren have won series 2. They've both had their moment of glory. Let someone else have their moment too. Share the joy!! Anton and Lesley were cruelly robbed of a place in the final last time, this is their chance to shine like the true stars they are.

VOTE ANTON AND LESLEY”

If they have been practising since the first series, I reckon there will be a suitably close contest, but don't underestimate the determination of Denise or the application of Aled - both could surprise us.

cheers
Cassandra
lauralou
15-12-2004
Originally Posted by minihoy:
“Yes i did listen to Len about technicality....I believe that they are technically great....I listen to CRH about chemistry and he said they had none!

Nat
xxx”

and when was this then? in your dreams?
jayemjay
16-12-2004
Whilst Jill and Darren were good at latin, I personally did not think that their ballroom was that good. The best foxtrot that I saw, was Ian and Denise! (That was earlier in the competition)
minihoy
16-12-2004
Originally Posted by lauralou:
“and when was this then? in your dreams?”

No it was on the BBC2 show.....he was on it quite a lot and on more than one occasion he said there was no connection. Believe it or not it doesn't matter to me. I am quite comfortable with the fact that u don't think Natasha and brendan have any chemistry...clearly u r not as liberal in your thinking when it comes to my (and CRH's) views on Jill and Darren.

Nat
xxx
laura82
16-12-2004
Originally Posted by minihoy:
“No it was on the BBC2 show.....he was on it quite a lot and on more than one occasion he said there was no connection. Believe it or not it doesn't matter to me. I am quite comfortable with the fact that u don't think Natasha and brendan have any chemistry...clearly u r not as liberal in your thinking when it comes to my (and CRH's) views on Jill and Darren.

Nat
xxx”

Nat is correct. CRH did say this quite a few times on ITT when he was on.

So no, she didnt dream it lauralou
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map