• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment Services
  • Terrestrial
  • Freeview
19th September 2012: Freeview Retune Day
<<
<
8 of 22
>>
>
kasg
07-08-2012
Originally Posted by DX30:
“For ad funded channels it's going to be live viewers - a pvr makes it too easy to skip the ad's.”

Exactly - who watches ads on a PVR? I watch hardly any live TV and consequently see hardly any ads. Programme sponsorship and product placement is the only way to go if you want to be noticed.
OwenSmith
07-08-2012
Originally Posted by kasg:
“Exactly - who watches ads on a PVR? I watch hardly any live TV and consequently see hardly any ads. Programme sponsorship and product placement is the only way to go if you want to be noticed.”

Viewing figures show that live linear TV watching is on the increase, driven by social media and dual screen watching. People are tweeting away the latest plot twists and things, so if you don't watch live but get the tweets all the plot twists are spoiled. Also you can't take part in the frenzied twittering yourself unless you watch live.

Personally I find this all a bit odd. I'm watching and listening to what's happening on screen, I do not have the spare concentration to do anything on my phone or any other device. If I try (eg. check a text from my mum) I find I have to rewind because I've missed something in the programme. Maybe some people don't mind missing half the programme because they're too busy tweeting?
kasg
07-08-2012
Originally Posted by OwenSmith:
“Viewing figures show that live linear TV watching is on the increase, driven by social media and dual screen watching. People are tweeting away the latest plot twists and things, so if you don't watch live but get the tweets all the plot twists are spoiled. Also you can't take part in the frenzied twittering yourself unless you watch live.”

Yes, it is a bit annoying to have to remember not to look too closely at Facebook and Twitter feeds and various websites and forums to avoid "spoiling" the programme, OTOH I am not as bothered as some by knowing the ending in advance - if a programme is worth watching it is still worth watching even when you know how it ends.
chrisy
07-08-2012
Originally Posted by OwenSmith:
“Personally I find this all a bit odd. I'm watching and listening to what's happening on screen, I do not have the spare concentration to do anything on my phone or any other device. If I try (eg. check a text from my mum) I find I have to rewind because I've missed something in the programme. Maybe some people don't mind missing half the programme because they're too busy tweeting?”

I have this problem too. Sometimes I put the TV on to watch something I'm not overly bothered about that is on before something I'm really interested in. The first show generally ends up with me picking up my laptop and checking emails/Twitter part-way through. This ends up being a mistake because I then effectively miss the rest of it or only have half an idea what is going on. I have to force myself to turn it off before the next show starts, or that's the whole evening wasted.

I quite like watching foreign language subtitled programmes for this reason - it's absolutely impossible to know what is going on unless you're paying full attention to the screen.
OwenSmith
07-08-2012
Originally Posted by chrisy:
“I quite like watching foreign language subtitled programmes for this reason - it's absolutely impossible to know what is going on unless you're paying full attention to the screen.”

I've found this too. I really have to concentrate and stay focussed to read all the subtitles, and the effort seems to aid understanding the plot and enjoying it. BBC4 showings of Wallander, The Killing and The Bridge have been highlights, I can't wait for the next one.
Muzer
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by OwenSmith:
“Because entire extra channels (ITV3 and ITV4) are of more use on Freeview Lite (ie. Repeater sites) than ITV1+1 and C4+1. This isn't possible due to the regionalisation issues as previously discussed, but apart from that a swap would be desirable.

Case in point: if this swap wasn't worthwhile then it wouldn't have been done for ITV3 (instead of ITV1+1) for the Channel Islands (the entire of which get only Freeview Lite). The Channel Islands are a special case, there are no COM muxes that can possibly be received from anywhere so the lack of regionalisation (for putting the +1 channels onto COM muxes) isn't an issue.”

The ONLY reason that it was change in the Channel Islands is that there IS no ITV1 +1 in the Channel Islands (even on satellite) - up until very recently, Channel TV was a separate company who owned the ITV franchise on the Channel Islands, and they never could afford to (or never wanted to) launch the channel. Therefore, it is replaced with ITV3 simply because otherwise there would be an empty space.
sparkplugs
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by Muzer:
“The ONLY reason that it was change in the Channel Islands is that there IS no ITV1 +1 in the Channel Islands (even on satellite) - up until very recently, Channel TV was a separate company who owned the ITV franchise on the Channel Islands, and they never could afford to (or never wanted to) launch the channel. Therefore, it is replaced with ITV3 simply because otherwise there would be an empty space.”

If only they could include ITV4 as well!
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“A retune is not as onerous a task as you seem to want to make out.”

It is a bit tedious if you have to re-block a pile of channels after each retune. I block all the adult and some other channels and have to do this after each retune. I was able to delete channels on analogue but it is not allowed on digital - a shame.
MarkLS12
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“I was able to delete channels on analogue but it is not allowed on digital - a shame.”

It is 'allowed' it depends on whether your equipment has the functionality to do it or not.

In my experience, lots of Freeview boxes and TVs allow you to delete channels.
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by Paddy C:
“Pretty pointless that they don't introduce a shopping section or re-order the channels in 1-50 to put them in order like on the Freesat EPG. ”

I agree with you on this but can't really comment on most of the rest as I do not understand it - especially all the abbreviations in the 'DMOL' document. They need a table of abbreviations so idiots like me can understand.

My comments if I had been consulted would be not to consult Sky as I'm sure they do not consult non sky broadcasters.

Keep the original analogue channels in their original channel numbers positions - this for the older generation who can't see a programme guide clearly.

I would like all the shopping channels to be kept together and if Sky has a presence on Freeview their channels should be with pay or internet tv stations, and not mixed in with free tv channels.

I am happy about the decision on the Adult channels though as I have complained to several bodies about the fact that I could not delete them. It seems that someone understands that they should not be mixed in with family channels. I would be happier still if I could prevent them appearing on my TV.
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by MarkLS12:
“It is 'allowed' it depends on whether your equipment has the functionality to do it or not.

In my experience, lots of Freeview boxes and TVs allow you to delete channels.”

My two year old LG tv and my 6 months old Samsung does not. I phoned each manufacturer and they told me that it was not a feature on their TV and I should 'block' the unwanted channels instead. LG could not explain why I was able to delete unwanted (poor reception) analogue channels but the delete option was missing from the digital channel listing screen.
Muzer
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“I agree with you on this but can't really comment on most of the rest as I do not understand it - especially all the abbreviations in the 'DMOL' document. They need a table of abbreviations so idiots like me can understand.

My comments if I had been consulted would be not to consult Sky as I'm sure they do not consult non sky broadcasters.

Keep the original analogue channels in their original channel numbers positions - this for the older generation who can't see a programme guide clearly.

I would like all the shopping channels to be kept together and if Sky has a presence on Freeview their channels should be with pay or internet tv stations, and not mixed in with free tv channels.

I am happy about the decision on the Adult channels though as I have complained to several bodies about the fact that I could not delete them. It seems that someone understands that they should not be mixed in with family channels. I would be happier still if I could prevent them appearing on my TV.”

Make a list here of the ones you don't understand and we'll explain them for you.
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by Muzer:
“If you were to actually read the report, you'd know that a small survey they requested showed that something like 3/4 of people use the up/down arrows. I know plenty of people who do...”

I use either the EPG or the channel numbers. Maybe the ones that use the up/down buttons have a problem seeing the EPG, it can be a bit small on some TV's.
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by joshua_welby:
“The EPGs are different because of the following

The Freeview EPG copies the old analogue system Channel 1 for BBC1 and so on

The Freesat EPG copies the Sky/Virgin EPG BBC1 at Channel 101 and BBC Three at Channel 106

I do not know why Freesat did not copy the Freeview EPG and had BBC1 on Channel 1, maybe they wanted to copy the Pay TV operators”

If each company/platform (or whatever you call them) has their own numbering system why on earth did sky and freesat need to be consulted. Are we consulted when they change their channel positions - I don't think so.
kev
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“If each company/platform (or whatever you call them) has their own numbering system why on earth did sky and freesat need to be consulted. Are we consulted when they change their channel positions - I don't think so.”

Not sure about Freesat, however Sky do have a number of channels on Freeview (Sky News, Challenge, Pick TV).

As for 101 on Freesat - this basically gives a more predictable experience than Freeview does. If Freeview had come along at the start (with all the radio) I dare say they would have gone for 3 digit numbers from the start.

On Freesat I press 101 the box switches to BBC ONE.
On Freeview I press 1, nothing happens, then the box switches to BBC ONE.
On Freeview I press 7 16 the box, but as I wasn't quick enough it goes to BBC Three - argh!!!
David (2)
08-08-2012
Freesat pvr all the way these days. From time to time I will tune into a live prog on freeview (eg the box is busy recording multiple stuff), sometimes i think well i might as well tune into IRT as I will be here anyway - then I regret the decision, ffs, how many breaks, an hour prog is only 43min long. I couldnt go back to that way of doing things, it would drive me mad.

Which is why commercials on the front of internet stuff even YouTube content really gets me - you have to wait for the skip option - a whole 5sec in some cases - and on some there is no skip at all.
patfiggerty
08-08-2012
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“The DMOL document states:”

Post #100


This sounds great but a pity the consultation was not communicated so broadly.

mossy2103
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“Post #100


This sounds great but a pity the consultation was not communicated so broadly.
”

So what would you have had them do?

Leaflet every house in the country (when only a small percentage would likely to have had any interest or understanding/)?
TV Time Mike
09-08-2012
Wouldn't an advert in the national press have done just as well and cost less?

A one page "We looking to improve the channel numbering on Freeview if you have any views etc. please write to etc."

I'm not saying everyone is all that bothered, I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't care as many TV's and freeview PVR's can autotune now but it would be nice if I felt that the country as a whole where given a say as we never really got one when Freeview popped up. At least I can't remember anything.
chrisy
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“If each company/platform (or whatever you call them) has their own numbering system why on earth did sky and freesat need to be consulted. Are we consulted when they change their channel positions - I don't think so.”

Everyone was consulted - it was a public consultation.

Also, Sky have channels on the platform and are shareholders in Freeview, so it would have been a bit weird if they hadn't been consulted!
MarkLS12
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by patfiggerty:
“My two year old LG tv and my 6 months old Samsung does not. I phoned each manufacturer and they told me that it was not a feature on their TV...”

On my two year old Samsung I can delete channels like this:

Menu -> Antenna -> Channel Manager -> Channels
Select the channel or channels you want to delete
Then: Tools -> Delete
brumlad36
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by MarkLS12:
“On my two year old Samsung I can delete channels like this:

Menu -> Antenna -> Channel Manager -> Channels
Select the channel or channels you want to delete
Then: Tools -> Delete”

On my TVonics DTR-HD500 you can "Hide" channels, so that the EPG only shows the channels you want.

Chris.
patfiggerty
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by brumlad36:
“On my TVonics DTR-HD500 you can "Hide" channels, so that the EPG only shows the channels you want.

Chris.”

I block the adult channels and select my top 20 channels and put them in a favourites list and I can then view the 'favourites' channel. It is very easy to do this on LG but very long winded on Samsung.
mossy2103
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by TV Time Mike:
“Wouldn't an advert in the national press have done just as well and cost less?

A one page "We looking to improve the channel numbering on Freeview if you have any views etc. please write to etc."

I'm not saying everyone is all that bothered, I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't care as many TV's and freeview PVR's can autotune now but it would be nice if I felt that the country as a whole where given a say as we never really got one when Freeview popped up. At least I can't remember anything.”

Apart from the fact that the national (printed) press does not have much of a circulation these days (around 8.5 million out of an adult population of what, nearly 49 million), I would have thought that the vast majority of that readership would not bother even reading such an ad, and of the remainder there would be many who are already sufficiently interested in broadcast issues to already be aware of the consultation from other sources.
patfiggerty
09-08-2012
Originally Posted by chrisy:
“Everyone was consulted - it was a public consultation.

Also, Sky have channels on the platform and are shareholders in Freeview, so it would have been a bit weird if they hadn't been consulted!”


I don't know of anybody who knew of this 'public' consultation. How exactly were the public consulted? The first I knew was when somebody mentioned another channel retune coming up in September.

Why are Sky shareholders in Freeview. Is it just because they have channels on it. Have all the other channel owners also got shares in it.

This is getting very complicated. I wonder if Sky and Freesat consult all channel owners when they reorganise channels on their platforms.
<<
<
8 of 22
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map