It's as simple as that really isn't it?
It was the same last year when they just kept the camera pointed at Jordan sitting on a rock smoking fags all day.
It doesn't matter what you do. If you are being hilarious, they can just cut the sound, then you are boring to the viewers.
Or you can touch a tree, and present that as a "highlight".
Yes, I suppose you could argue that Natalie has been more entertaining than some of the others. But I believe that entertainment value can only be quantified due to comparisons with edits of the others that the show decides to present to you.
If they focused on Huggy picking his nose a lot, or Sheila eating rice in a "funny way" or something, they can make that into an interesting personality quirk, with Ant and Dec pissing themselves at irrelevance such as that......and that "presentation" communicates effectively to the viewer.
Think about it.
If someone could see the future, and told you that you could look forward to one of the main highlights of the show being somebody touching a tree...what would you honestly think?
Truthfully?
The people in the camp on previous shows maintained that the people they found hugely entertaining were Chris Bisson and Mike Read...the people who the viewers perceived as the most boring.
It's not just the editing either,..it's how the presentation of the edits come across that affects perception.
So all it takes is for the camera to simply be on a contestant.
Then if that contestant isn't actually that entertaining at all,..then no worries......the actual presentation of the edits of that person are what make something entertaining out of absolutely nothing at all.
All you have to do is seek attention,..then if the show wants to give you that attention then you can be made into something more interesting than what you actually are.
It's hard to tell on this occasion if certain people have been deliberately edited out to favour somebody else. Or if the show is simply hyping Natalie up a lot because everyone else is simply genuinely dull.
But what i do know, is that there has been much, much more drops in sound this year, and more visual cut aways from the camp.
And BOTH of Natalie's sisters have been doing the rounds promoting Natalie on various TV shows.
BOTH sisters.
This could only have taken a bit of arm twisting and a preplanned intention for a campaign.
Sounds to me like a concerted publicity campaign with some determined PR behind it.
Natalie's lesser known sister; "Lee" actually came out with the cliched reality TV lines "With Nat,..what you see is what you get"...and that other old chestnut "Nat wears her heart on her sleeve"
I'm not lying...Lee actually came out with those exact lines. They are predictable lines that always get blurted out when canvassing for support for the most desperate of reality show contestants,...but they are effective because people accept them at face value and believed them without question in the past, whover they were used to help support.
It was the same last year when they just kept the camera pointed at Jordan sitting on a rock smoking fags all day.
It doesn't matter what you do. If you are being hilarious, they can just cut the sound, then you are boring to the viewers.
Or you can touch a tree, and present that as a "highlight".
Yes, I suppose you could argue that Natalie has been more entertaining than some of the others. But I believe that entertainment value can only be quantified due to comparisons with edits of the others that the show decides to present to you.
If they focused on Huggy picking his nose a lot, or Sheila eating rice in a "funny way" or something, they can make that into an interesting personality quirk, with Ant and Dec pissing themselves at irrelevance such as that......and that "presentation" communicates effectively to the viewer.
Think about it.
If someone could see the future, and told you that you could look forward to one of the main highlights of the show being somebody touching a tree...what would you honestly think?
Truthfully?
The people in the camp on previous shows maintained that the people they found hugely entertaining were Chris Bisson and Mike Read...the people who the viewers perceived as the most boring.
It's not just the editing either,..it's how the presentation of the edits come across that affects perception.
So all it takes is for the camera to simply be on a contestant.
Then if that contestant isn't actually that entertaining at all,..then no worries......the actual presentation of the edits of that person are what make something entertaining out of absolutely nothing at all.
All you have to do is seek attention,..then if the show wants to give you that attention then you can be made into something more interesting than what you actually are.
It's hard to tell on this occasion if certain people have been deliberately edited out to favour somebody else. Or if the show is simply hyping Natalie up a lot because everyone else is simply genuinely dull.
But what i do know, is that there has been much, much more drops in sound this year, and more visual cut aways from the camp.
And BOTH of Natalie's sisters have been doing the rounds promoting Natalie on various TV shows.
BOTH sisters.
This could only have taken a bit of arm twisting and a preplanned intention for a campaign.
Sounds to me like a concerted publicity campaign with some determined PR behind it.
Natalie's lesser known sister; "Lee" actually came out with the cliched reality TV lines "With Nat,..what you see is what you get"...and that other old chestnut "Nat wears her heart on her sleeve"
I'm not lying...Lee actually came out with those exact lines. They are predictable lines that always get blurted out when canvassing for support for the most desperate of reality show contestants,...but they are effective because people accept them at face value and believed them without question in the past, whover they were used to help support.
,..she was just an example.