|
||||||||
2G Network Closure |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
2G Network Closure
Ameican phone company AT&T have announced that they intend to close their 2G network on 1st January 2017. Apparently on 12% of their subscribers use 2G only.
I wonder if any of the UK networks are planning to do this. O2 and Vodafone are already using their old 2G 900Mhz for 3G. Im sure we have more 2G only subscribers than AT&T. But it must be on the cards at some point. http://m.engadget.com/2012/08/03/att-plans-to-shut-down-entire-2g-network-by-2017/?icid=eng_latest_art |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, Dunfermline Area
Posts: 10,704
|
Untill the likes of 02 improve there 3g network coverage. There is no way 2g will close. Parts of North Scotland dont have 3g coverage on any network. I have been just past Perth a few times this year and there is no 3g coverage unless you are in Perth.
Darren |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
Obviously O2 are a good example of not to run a 3G network (unless you are an accountant looking to save money by making a minimal investment)
![]() In Japan Softbank switched off their 2G network in March 2010 followed by NTT DoCoMo in March 2011. It will happen eventually. Im sure people said they would never switch off 1G but it happened. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TheEssexSunshineCoast Clacton
Posts: 15,220
|
In Many parts of Clacton I only get 2G on my S2 on T-Mobile.
3G goes where I live but just down the road where the main town is it can be really hard to get a signal where the shops are. Really surprised its not improved at all round here and three can be the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,488
|
One of the reasons to switch off 2G is to reuse the frequency for 3G. So the 3G coverage should improve after 2G is turned off. 900MHz has much better penetration of walls than the normal 3G frequencies (2.1 GHz I seem to remember). 3G at 900 MHz is good for everyone except those with a 2G only phone or 2G only subscription (both of these are likely to be low spending groups, so the operators aren't too worried if they change network ).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
|
O2 have a lot of work to do before they could do that as others have said.
If Ofcom set a date I think that would be really cool, there's nothing you can do on 2g that you can't do on 3g and you can get 3g phones quite cheap these days even if you don't want the mobile internet services. I think it would be a good move. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,505
|
Why is it two countries with high population can manage to do this but we can't ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Yorks
Posts: 6,180
|
Quote:
Why is it two countries with high population can manage to do this but we can't ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bristol (BBC1 West)
Posts: 15,143
|
Quote:
Why is it two countries with high population can manage to do this but we can't ?
While AT&T is a national network, it doesn't have a licence in every state, so it doesn't have as big a network as you'd expect. AT&T also happens to have a terrible reputation for coverage and customer service. As an aside, the networks in the US are considered to be far more expensive and unreliable than the networks over here. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London
Posts: 20,282
|
Can't see it happening yet, while there's a healthy market for smartphones in the UK, there are still plenty of customers who use budget phones or the growing market in easy to use mobiles for older people, which only use 2G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,488
|
Coverage in the USA is far worse than in the UK, they focus on the cities and highways and leave a lot gaps where farms or country lanes are.
The USA is also far happier to ditch old technology than Europeans. They are queuing up to buy the next big thing and accept that something they bought could be outdated after a couple of years. In the UK we are very lucky to have the coverage we have on all major networks. Turning off 2G and reusing the frequency for 3G could increase total capacity, improve data rates and reduce the need for inter system hangovers (a common cause of dropped calls) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 570
|
Quote:
Coverage in the USA is far worse than in the UK, they focus on the cities and highways and leave a lot gaps where farms or country lanes are.
The USA is also far happier to ditch old technology than Europeans. They are queuing up to buy the next big thing and accept that something they bought could be outdated after a couple of years. In the UK we are very lucky to have the coverage we have on all major networks. Turning off 2G and reusing the frequency for 3G could increase total capacity, improve data rates and reduce the need for inter system hangovers (a common cause of dropped calls) |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,274
|
Quote:
I've found 3G (Well Verizions sort of 3G) to cover the majority of the country and 4G LTE covers much of it now (Not on AT&T admittedly)
Verizon have LTE coverage in 330 'markets' (or, in English, 330 cities) with little-to-no attention being paid to more rural areas - as illustrated by this map. I understand it's completely different to the UK due to the way in which the population is distributed across the country but in terms of overall coverage, I doubt any US network would measure up to the UK networks - not even O2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Essex
Posts: 3,906
|
When I was on my hols in the USA last year everyhting seemed to revolve around AT&T, and 4G seemed to be the 'norm' but where I live twixt Colchester & Clacton, not only is 3G only a dream most days, 2G is not much better, VF was absolute pants, so ditiched them, my son has 02 that does not seem much better, now gone with 3, whose coverage although badly lacking seems a tad better then the other two !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lyon, France
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
Why is it two countries with high population can manage to do this but we can't ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,274
|
Quote:
When I was on my hols in the USA last year everyhting seemed to revolve around AT&T, and 4G seemed to be the 'norm'
Proper 4G (LTE) requires an altogether different handset from '4G' as some of the US networks advertise it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Posts: 8,298
|
Get out into the sticks in the States and cell phone signals are truly awful, we have much better coverage in the UK overall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 186
|
EE are planning on using their 2G spectrum for LTE so I guess despite the money they (will) make off (LTE) smartphones outweighs that they will make off existing 2G only phones.
Considering o2 & Vodaphone are waiting it out for the spectrum auction they seem to have no plans to follow suit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
Only because the likes of AT&T and T-Mobile in the US are marketing 3G as 4G.
Proper 4G (LTE) requires an altogether different handset from '4G' as some of the US networks advertise it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ealing, London
Posts: 2,140
|
Quote:
Get out into the sticks in the States and cell phone signals are truly awful, we have much better coverage in the UK overall.
As for turning of 2G they will start doing it so the networks can ruse the frequency for LTE services. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 834
|
They can't possibly turn off 3G when so many people use phones that are 2G only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,099
|
Quote:
They can't possibly turn off 3G when so many people use phones that are 2G only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,274
|
Quote:
The same was probably also said about analogue TV. But that's happened.
There are plenty of non-3G phones still on the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
Quote:
The same was probably also said about analogue TV. But that's happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
|
They stopped supporting pagers, 1G phones, analogue tv, the first gen digital set top boxes are now obsolete.
The average mobile lifespan is 2-3 years. I think 2g only folks should expect the operators to gradually start moving over frequencies to 4g services over the next few years with a total cut over of at least 1 network in maybe 5 years in the uk. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55.




