• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
  • Big Brother Appreciation
*****Luke A Appreciation***Part 2***
<<
<
119 of 125
>>
>
Veri
10-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“In BB9 people perceived as 'big players' (ie Luke and Bex) were out relatively early on; certainly in the case of Bex, they almost all seemed to assume that Mo would go. From that time on it was obvious that there was no hostile power block that could prevail against the general friendship group that B-block quickly became. Apart from in the aftermath of the cake task (when the hostility towards Rachel was short-lived, and really only acute for half a day) Rachel really never seemed to have anything to worry about. She got on badly with no one after Luke had gone; she was very close to Kat and quite close to Mikey; Rachel was only up for eviction once, against someone she was neutral about, and in fact never lost a friend from the house from beginning to end. The tasks were generally unemotional stuff - eat sprouts, lick crisps, paint yourself blue, make a table tennis video.

In BB13 Luke lost two of the people he was closest to early on; he was up against one of his closest friends a bit later in a head to head; the house was very badly split, with him on the minority side almost throughout; he was up for eviction three times; two of the people he had thought were close and friendly defected completely to the other side; the turf war task seemed designed to be as stressful as possible. It was not until the final week that the stress seemed to be off, and both Luke and Rachel faced notably difficult final line-ups, with strong rival contenders.”

BB9 was three weeks longer. The length alone results in stress, and it also has implications for how we evaluate other things.

BB9's Luke went out in week 8 of a 13 week series, so it may have seemed "relatively early". But 8 weeks would be most of bb13, and indeed Conor wasn't there much longer, since he went out in week 9.

It's interesting that you don't mention Rex at all, since he was the HM who put the most pressure on Rachel. Anyway, the time when Rex saw her VT and accused her of lying was when Stu was HoH in week 8. The cakes were in week 10, which would have been the last week of bb13. The cake clash also led to her being up for eviction that week.

So Rachel's trials and tribulations lasted about as long as all of bb13, even if we assume (which I don't think is entirely correct) that it was smooth sailing for her from then on.

BB13 had nothing comparable to 'spit-gate'. That night was very stressful in itself, and it led to lasting divisions and ill-feeling. bb9 was at least as badly split as bb13.

The nastiest thing in bb13, Conor's rant, wasn't even heard by most of the HMs. And the HMs targeted in the bb13 eating task were Deana, and to a much lesser extent Lydia, not Luke. And while Rachel wasn't a target on spit-night, she did face direct pressure from Rex a number of times and had Luke and Bex using auditions against her.

Unlike Rachel, Luke A never went up against anyone like Alexandra or Rex.

I don't know which "two of the people (Luke A) had thought were close and friendly defected completely to the other side". I'm guessing Becky was one, though they were never very close. Of course, Rachel had a defection from her Rebecca too.
wonkeydonkey
10-05-2013
Originally Posted by Veri:
“BB9's Luke went out in week 8 of a 13 week series, so it may have seemed "relatively early". But 8 weeks would be most of bb13, and indeed Conor wasn't there much longer, since he went out in week 9.”

True, but it was when Bex was evicted against Mo that it seemed obvious that things were all over for that side. Luke certainly knew it.

Quote:
“It's interesting that you don't mention Rex at all, since he was the HM who put the most pressure on Rachel. Anyway, the time when Rex saw her VT and accused her of lying was when Stu was HoH in week 8. The cakes were in week 10, which would have been the last week of bb13. The cake clash also led to her being up for eviction that week.”

Rachel was not always easy to read imo. Apart from the night of the cake competition she always seemed to have an attitude of serene friendliness to Rex and Mo. Either she really wasn't bothered by what Rex said about her VT or she was very good at putting a brave face on things.

Quote:
“BB13 had nothing comparable to 'spit-gate'. That night was very stressful in itself, and it led to lasting divisions and ill-feeling. bb9 was at least as badly split as bb13.”

True, yes, but if anything there must have been something rather pleasant about seeing all those who had behaved worst evicted one by one. Maybe not so much for Rachel, since she seemed to have no vengefulness in her.
Quote:
“Unlike Rachel, Luke A never went up against anyone like Alexandra or Rex.”

It's not always easy to tell. When he was asked what he had against Caroline, he said "she made Lauren's life sheer hell". I'm not sure that we ever saw that at all. It did suggest that she said a lot more than we saw.

Quote:
“I don't know which "two of the people (Luke A) had thought were close and friendly defected completely to the other side". I'm guessing Becky was one, though they were never very close. Of course, Rachel had a defection from her Rebecca too.”

Again, it is not easy to tell because there was so much we didn't see. But Luke's words to Becky during their row suggested that they had been a lot closer than we saw. He was saying (and comments during the turf war task confirmed this) that they were the only two housemates who liked swimming, and that they had spent a lot of time in the pool together on a daily basis. Certainly the one conversation we did see (when he described the physical gender transition process) suggested a close and easy relationship. Then, when she started hanging out with Conor and the insiders "she got really weird" with him. Apart from "good morning, evictee" we didn't see what she said, but it was surely something. The other one was Sheivonne, who literally went in a day from saying that he had "a heart of gold" and "really saved me tonight" to listening obediently (but wrongly) the the instructions that she must nominate "LA" and nominated the wrong LA without a word.
Veri
13-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“...
Rachel was not always easy to read imo. Apart from the night of the cake competition she always seemed to have an attitude of serene friendliness to Rex and Mo. Either she really wasn't bothered by what Rex said about her VT or she was very good at putting a brave face on things. ”

Didn't Rex have her in tears in the DR at some point before the cake thing?

Quote:
“True, yes, but if anything there must have been something rather pleasant about seeing all those who had behaved worst evicted one by one. Maybe not so much for Rachel, since she seemed to have no vengefulness in her.”

Well, here's the order of evictees from that week: Sylvia, Jennifer, Mario, Belinda, Rebecca, Luke, Dale, Stuart, ...

I don't think that's quite "hose who had behaved worst" being "evicted one by one". Mario was among those who'd behaved best during spit-gate; Belinda hadn't even been there; and Dale was worse that night than Luke and Rebecca.

Quote:
“
Quote:
“Unlike Rachel, Luke A never went up against anyone like Alexandra or Rex.”

It's not always easy to tell. When he was asked what he had against Caroline, he said "she made Lauren's life sheer hell". I'm not sure that we ever saw that at all. It did suggest that she said a lot more than we saw.”

Sorry, but I don't see how that's even relevant.
wonkeydonkey
25-05-2013
Larry Hillington back in at least his fourth incarnation, making faint efforts this time round to disguise his obsessive need to post endless anti-Luke posts. What a strange person he is.
Noisy Oyster
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Larry Hillington back in at least his fourth incarnation, making faint efforts this time round to disguise his obsessive need to post endless anti-Luke posts. What a strange person he is.”

Yes, I thought that too
jeanoj
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Larry Hillington back in at least his fourth incarnation, making faint efforts this time round to disguise his obsessive need to post endless anti-Luke posts. What a strange person he is.”

Very weird person! I thought DS had the ability to stop banned members coming back with a new identity?
wonkeydonkey
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“Very weird person! I thought DS had the ability to stop banned members coming back with a new identity?”

It's not allowed. But of course people do it all the time. This one has a very distinctive style, so it is pretty obvious. Once or twice I have seen previously banned users accidentally refer to a post they made under their previous name, which is always funny.
jeanoj
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“It's not allowed. But of course people do it all the time. This one has a very distinctive style, so it is pretty obvious. Once or twice I have seen previously banned users accidentally refer to a post they made under their previous name, which is always funny.”

I shall keep my eyes open for that!
wonkeydonkey
25-05-2013
Oh dear, here is he indignantly saying that he has posted positive things about Luke if we only bother to look, presumably counting on the fact that no one would, only... I did... He really is a man on a mission. Three locked threads in two days is quite an achievement.
Noisy Oyster
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Oh dear, here is he indignantly saying that he has posted positive things about Luke if we only bother to look, presumably counting on the fact that no one would, only... I did... He really is a man on a mission. Three locked threads in two days is quite an achievement.”

He obviously didn't appreciate your determination. I'm glad Luke has you on his side
jeanoj
25-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Oh dear, here is he indignantly saying that he has posted positive things about Luke if we only bother to look, presumably counting on the fact that no one would, only... I did... He really is a man on a mission. Three locked threads in two days is quite an achievement.”

I laughed my head off when I saw all 3 threads had been locked! He really is a pompous man isn't he? I cannot bear people who think, if they say something often enough, we will start to believe!

On a separate note, I hope those that are going next Saturday have a fantastic time and I expect to read a full account on here afterwards - unless you agree that Luke is:

a. boring
b. least entertaining
c. least deserving

wonkeydonkey
26-05-2013
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“I laughed my head off when I saw all 3 threads had been locked! He really is a pompous man isn't he? I cannot bear people who think, if they say something often enough, we will start to believe!

On a separate note, I hope those that are going next Saturday have a fantastic time and I expect to read a full account on here afterwards - unless you agree that Luke is:

a. boring
b. least entertaining
c. least deserving

”

Will do my best. And thanks.
jeanoj
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Oh dear, here is he indignantly saying that he has posted positive things about Luke if we only bother to look, presumably counting on the fact that no one would, only... I did... He really is a man on a mission. Three locked threads in two days is quite an achievement.”

He sent me a PM asking who Harry Lillington was (yes, he really did spell it like that!!). I cannot reply (not that I want to) because he is now an inactive member.
Noisy Oyster
27-05-2013
This must be his second ban in this incarnation then.
jeanoj
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by Noisy Oyster:
“This must be his second ban in this incarnation then.”

LOL - some people never learn do they. I wonder why he was banned this time?
Noisy Oyster
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“LOL - some people never learn do they. I wonder why he was banned this time?”

No idea, although posting exactly the same thing in different forms was becoming very boring, much more boring than Luke could ever be no matter how hard he tried
kimotag
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Larry Hillington back in at least his fourth incarnation, making faint efforts this time round to disguise his obsessive need to post endless anti-Luke posts. What a strange person he is.”

He has more incarnations than DR Who. His worrying obsession with Luke always gives the game away!
jeanoj
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by kimotag:
“He has more incarnations than DR Who. His worrying obsession with Luke always gives the game away!”

Perhaps he IS Dr Who
wonkeydonkey
27-05-2013
Originally Posted by kimotag:
“He has more incarnations than DR Who. His worrying obsession with Luke always gives the game away!”

Yes, and always in the same slightly old fashioned, repetitive style. I am genuinely curious about the motivation for someone who devotes so much time and trouble to attacking an ex housemate.
Cowie
30-05-2013
It's a bit boring. And odd. Bring on the new season I say!
wonkeydonkey
03-06-2013
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“On a separate note, I hope those that are going next Saturday have a fantastic time and I expect to read a full account on here afterwards - unless you agree that Luke is:

a. boring
b. least entertaining
c. least deserving

”

Yay! Lovely weekend in Chester... met at posh pub by the river where Luke posed for photographs with a dog so small it was not even a handbag dog - possibly a matchbox dog and Adam was drinking something out of a can called Monster. I don't exactly know what it was, but I think it made him grow bigger, as you can see in a minute...

Then next day some of us met at the same pub, and the river did look really nice in the sunshine, then some of us went to a coffee bar called Central Perk, which was a copy of the one in Friends; and we managed to collar the identical sofa and two chairs that they have in Central Perk in friends, where we sat facing a screen where we could watch the people in Friends sitting on identical furniture facing us, which was a bit odd, especially for Luke who really does sometimes look like Joey, so was practically looking in a mirror.

Then the actual party was in an underground room, and as well as Luke and Adam we had Luke's parents and his brother. To no one's surprise Luke is much quieter than Adam, but he was really good about talking to every person individually and making everyone feel really welcome, so my daughter, who had not met him before, said he was a ledge. Adam really is about nine feet tall and if you get a hug from him you feel hugged. He managed to get himself handcuffed to one extra pretty girl for about two hours, hmmmm. Apart from that, considering that an awful lot of alcohol was drunk, everyone was very well behaved.

Next day, in spite of having drunk approximately a hogshead of wine - I'm not sure what a hogshead is, but it sounds a lot - I was able to get up and meet some of the people for brunch, and it was really nice after being in a room with 50 people the night before to sit somewhere quiet and just chat. I think everyone had a good time; I obviously can't post a load of photographs of people who haven't consented, but here is one of me and Adam, and I promise I am not three feet tall...http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/3...mallerfile.jpg I am wearing Adam's hat, but unfortunately he took it back at the end of the night. Boooo.
jeanoj
03-06-2013
Originally Posted by wonkeydonkey:
“Yay! Lovely weekend in Chester... met at posh pub by the river where Luke posed for photographs with a dog so small it was not even a handbag dog - possibly a matchbox dog and Adam was drinking something out of a can called Monster. I don't exactly know what it was, but I think it made him grow bigger, as you can see in a minute...

Then next day some of us met at the same pub, and the river did look really nice in the sunshine, then some of us went to a coffee bar called Central Perk, which was a copy of the one in Friends; and we managed to collar the identical sofa and two chairs that they have in Central Perk in friends, where we sat facing a screen where we could watch the people in Friends sitting on identical furniture facing us, which was a bit odd, especially for Luke who really does sometimes look like Joey, so was practically looking in a mirror.

Then the actual party was in an underground room, and as well as Luke and Adam we had Luke's parents and his brother. To no one's surprise Luke is much quieter than Adam, but he was really good about talking to every person individually and making everyone feel really welcome, so my daughter, who had not met him before, said he was a ledge. Adam really is about nine feet tall and if you get a hug from him you feel hugged. He managed to get himself handcuffed to one extra pretty girl for about two hours, hmmmm. Apart from that, considering that an awful lot of alcohol was drunk, everyone was very well behaved.

Next day, in spite of having drunk approximately a hogshead of wine - I'm not sure what a hogshead is, but it sounds a lot - I was able to get up and meet some of the people for brunch, and it was really nice after being in a room with 50 people the night before to sit somewhere quiet and just chat. I think everyone had a good time; I obviously can't post a load of photographs of people who haven't consented, but here is one of me and Adam, and I promise I am not three feet tall...http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/3...mallerfile.jpg I am wearing Adam's hat, but unfortunately he took it back at the end of the night. Boooo.”

Thank you WD - so pleased it all went well and you had a good time. I saw lots of the photos on FB and everyone seemed like they were having a blast. With a bit of luck and a closer venue I want to be there next time.
wonkeydonkey
03-06-2013
Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“Thank you WD - so pleased it all went well and you had a good time. I saw lots of the photos on FB and everyone seemed like they were having a blast. With a bit of luck and a closer venue I want to be there next time.”

Yes, definitely.
wonkeydonkey
05-06-2013
One year ago today, I posted:

Quote:
“I think he is my first night favourite.”

jeanoj
05-06-2013
Don' forget to vote on this poll:

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1833522
<<
<
119 of 125
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map