|
||||||||
Big mo : prosppect of being a great GREAT gran! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 149
|
Big mo : prosppect of being a great GREAT gran!
it dont make sense! how old is big mo suppose to be? lets say 65, that wud mean everyone down the line had a kid in their teens!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 25,833
|
I've always wondered how old she is supposed to be. She really doesn't look that much older than Charlie..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I've always thought Mo's age didnt make sense.
Lynne was about 35-36, so the youngest Viv could have been (if she was still alive) was 52. That would mean Mo has to be 70ish but she's supposed to have grown up with Pat who I took to be around 60.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,969
|
I see it as.
Big Mo: 65 Charlie: 52 Viv 48 if still alive. Ok I made this of the top of my head but I think it works. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamfocus
I see it as.
Big Mo: 65 Charlie: 52 Viv 48 if still alive. Ok I made this of the top of my head but I think it works. Also, Lynne mentioned being 35 once and Kat is supposed to be 33 or 34, so Viv would have had her first baby at 12
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,969
|
ok erm
Big Mo: 65 Charlie: 60 and Viv 50. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 1,085
|
I'm guessing:
Big Mo 67 Charlie 60 Viv 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
But that would make Mo 12 when she had Viv.
On that Pat/Mo specail thing, she was at least 17-18 when she fell pregnant. Mind you, when did soaps have to make sense? |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewWoman
But that would make Mo 12 when she had Viv.
On that Pat/Mo specail thing, she was at least 17-18 when she fell pregnant. Mind you, when did soaps have to make sense? |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,607
|
I'm sure I read that Mo was six years older than Pat, and that Mo was about 68.
So we could say Mo 68 Charlie 60 Viv 53 or 54 Lynne 36 There that works! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Waterford, Ireland
Posts: 666
|
Wasn't there something about a 60th party for Mo a couple of years back? Sorry to add to the confusion!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
Right on the BBC's Enders site, it states that:
Mo's DOB is 18.02.1936 which makes her 68 years old. Pat's DOB is 28.12.1942 which makes her 62 years old and six years younger than Mo. Charlie's DOB is 13.05.1941which makes him 63 years old. Lynne's DOB is 17.08.1968 which makes her 36 years old. So I'm guessing that Viv was born in the early 1950's and must be around 50-53 years of age. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,607
|
Thanks for that...I do remember reading that Mo was born in 1936 and that Pat was born in 1942.
And the 60th birthday party must have been Charlie's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 792
|
also charlie is supposed to be ten or more years older than Viv so that would explain why he and old mo are so close in age
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,326
|
Wow. That was a lot of pointless math!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:53.

