|
||||||||
'Enders - Total Leaving Could Reach 21 |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,690
|
'Enders - Total Leaving Could Reach 21
Den, Sharon, Vicki, Paul, Patrick, Yolande, Adi, Ash, Ronnie, Kareena, and Tariq, Sasha, Andy and Spencer are all leaving.
Rumours say Gus, Juley, Sam, Derek, Zoe, Minty and Garry are to go soon too. Really sort the place aht. It brings total number axed to TWENTY-ONE. Leaving the new cast (inc. new arrivals) Nana, Alfie, Kat, Jake and Danny Moon. Chrissie and Dennis. Charlie, Mo and Stacey Slater. Pauline, Martin and Sonia Fowler. Billy and Little Mo Mitchell. Ian, Lucy and Peter Beale. Dot and Jim Branning. Keith, Rosie, Demi, Mickey and Darren Miller. + Pat, Jane and Johnny Allen. Smaller and more dynamic, we have a new cast ready for brilliant storylines. Views? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,067
|
Patrick and Yolande are leaving? I hadn't heard that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,167
|
that would ruin the show ,we don't want all new characters, we want better storylines to look foward to not lots of characters leaving episodes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,690
|
Yes there was a story saying they'd decided to leave.
Brooksider I disagree, I believe it will be the making of EastEnders. If it isn't nothing will be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,167
|
ratings have turned around enough so is there any point.and the new character are not anything special so far so will the rest be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,067
|
I've heard there is going to be some kind of 'spectacular' to get shot of some of them - it would be the only way to do it, otherwise there will be departures every week!
It is a huge number of cast to lose in a short time - they need to start recruiting fast. The Millers are not, for me, a success (yet), don't know if the tabloids/general viewership like them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
Rudolph Walker (Patrick Trueman) and Angela Wynter (Yolande Trueman), are only considering leaving, nothing has been decided yet. They are both worried that once Gary leaves their storylines will dry up and so they will be better off working on other projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
A smaller cast are not going to be able to cope with the heavy workload. Quality will plummet.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
As BCJ stated, the cast will be too small for the 4 episodes a week output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,167
|
Do the viewers want 4 episodes a week, 3 will do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
I think the only way forward for EastEnders is to reduce to three if wants rid of so many cast members. That will be the only way EastEnders even has a chance of getting better.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
Yeah 3 episodes are enough, as far as that soap is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southend, UK
Posts: 457
|
I think she'll bring a few more younger people in, as well as maybe 1 or 2 middle-aged peeps.
We'll see, I guess, but I hope Gary and Minty stay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Manchester
Posts: 7,708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSarge
Yeah 3 episodes are enough, as far as that soap is concerned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
i didnt hear of anything about patrick and yolande leaving. I dont think this would help teh soap at all, having 21 characters leaving although its just rumours, if this amount were to leave i dont think it would help, theres only so much change a soap can make. you might argue that over the years characters have left and the soaps gone on, but thats over the space of nearly 20 years.
Having all these characters leave, and to have it believeable there will need to be some good script writing going on. Getting rid of patrick and yolande will be a big mistake. Although they havent done much for the soap lately. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Walford, E20
Posts: 6,561
|
Hmm I dont' know. 14 seemed like a huge number but 21? It seems like an awful lot of characters to leave the show in one space of time. They'd all have to go around the same time aswell otherwise next year would just be people leaving Walford every week. I agree with Gus, Juley and Derek going though. They are pointless.
I dunno, its a bit of a scary time as it always is when a new Executive Producer takes over, but when a soap is in the state that EastEnders has been in this year, big changes are needed and that transition could be a bit hit an miss. I dont' know, I'll wait and see how the new characters settle in. The characters already axed I'm happy with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 37,041
|
What about Peggy? Is the character staying or going, due to Babs asking for a lighter work schedule and boss lady saying no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,006
|
Jay-H I don't want to state the obvious, but where is the source for this? (apart from the confirmed ones!)
21 is a very high number to axe/cull! personally I don't think the number will be that high! it would seem very stupid for KH to take such a drastic action! and to lose such a high amount would increase the workload on the other actors... unless they are dropping an episode? and going back to 3 per week.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Which is exactly what I said they need to do.
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Durham City
Posts: 333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Early Bird
Jay-H I don't want to state the obvious, but where is the source for this? (apart from the confirmed ones!)
21 is a very high number to axe/cull! personally I don't think the number will be that high! it would seem very stupid for KH to take such a drastic action! and to lose such a high amount would increase the workload on the other actors... unless they are dropping an episode? and going back to 3 per week.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,994
|
Eastenders definately went down in quality the more episodes it increased to. Even when it went to 3 episodes a week in about 1994 it did lose quality. The BBC would never put it back to 3 episodes a week, they would be too worried people would see it as a sign of defeat, or phasing Eastenders out and they don't want to look to be doing this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Walford, E20
Posts: 6,561
|
Maybe the extra episode has nothing to do with it, it just hit a really bad patch. I remember Louise Berridge saying it was harder when the fourth episode a week was going out, But I think they're just excuses. As we've said already, Emmerdale and Corrie are going out six and five times a week and the two of them have been on top form this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 606
|
i cant see them staying with that limited cast. There isnt enough people there to base credible stories around. Plus there is a big gap in the age spread of that cast between the 13 to 20 something age group. Stacey is the only one in that age group currently on that list isnt she?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,326
|
Well, there's Mickey Demi and Darren.
So mickey would have to go out with Stacey and Darren and Demi would have some twisted Twin Insest storyline. And Peter and Lucy Beale, Lucy now old enough for her own training-bra-storyline with "New Mum" Jane. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouldydc
Well, there's Mickey Demi and Darren.
So mickey would have to go out with Stacey and Darren and Demi would have some twisted Twin Insest storyline. erm yeah. my point exactly
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:53.


