Originally Posted by pistonbroke:
“Did he have the permission of the next of kin? No
Did he make any effort to return the property to relatives? No”
Are these the same relatives who
ignored Diana's express wishes and gave her godchildren worthless tat instead of the substantial sums of money she bequeathed to them?
Diana's relatives might have had the legal right to control all her property, but I question the ethics of ignoring the clear provisions of a last will and testament.
For such people to then adopt the moral high ground and go gunning for Paul is beneath contempt.Without them, he would never have stood trial in the first place.