Originally Posted by sterock85:
“If someone is such a good songwriter then they would more often than not write most of their material without the need of any help.
I'm not sure what songs you listen to with regards to Amy Macdonald but her songwriting is far from basic. The melodies she composes are infectious, she has the ability to conjure up so much emotion in her writing and she doesn't write about cliche love themes and instead uses interesting subject matters for her lyrics such as alzheimer's disease, Chilean mining disaster or football rivalry etc, this she has proven over 3 albums now.
For the record we are not talking about voices but it's all down to personal taste. I hate Paloma's whiney. faux american vocals.”
As you say - its all down to person opinion. And i think Amy MacDonald is absolutely shit.
Amy isn't that successful for a reason - she just isn't that good.
Paloma and Marina & The Diamonds are under-rated vocally and lyrically, but they do have success because people do believe in their music, their vocal ability etc.
But to me - Amy MacDonald is nothing new, she is a bore. The tone in her voice is hard to stomach. And i have listened to her songs, and its nothing new. (i know im going of topic here, because this person is not british) but Lana Del Rey writes great songs, the melodies are perfect, and she makes it truly magnificent to listen to. So compare Lana Del Rey and Paloma, then Lana Del Rey and Amy MacDonald and you will see how basic Amy's writing skills are - in fact, i would say Taylor swift has more writing ability than Amy - and thats saying something.